Wykorzystanie koncepcji Konkurujących logik Instytucjonalnych w badaniach organizacji

• Autorzy: Przemysław Hensel

Warianty tytułu

The use of the institutional logics perspective In organization studies

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Koncepcja konkurujących logik instytucjonalnych jest jednym z najciekawszych nowych obszarów badań w dziedzinie teorii organizacji i zarządzania. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest zaprezentowanie tej koncepcji oraz sformułowanie wskazówek dotyczących możliwości jej wykorzystania w badaniach organizacji. W tekście zawarto przegląd badań prowadzonych w ramach tej koncepcji, natomiast w podsumowaniu przedstawiono wskazówki, które mogą być pomocne w badaniach terenowych konkurencji, kooperacji i koewolucji logik instytucjonalnych. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The institutional logics perspective presently constitutes one of the most promising area of research in the organization theory. The growing number of studies accounting for competition, cooperation and co-evolution between institutional logics published in the recent years indicates that the perspective opens new possibilities in organizational research. This paper presents the main assumptions and theses of the institutional logics perspective and provides advice on its use in the field research. In particular the usefulness of qualitative research methods and challenges associated with their application are discussed. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Neoinstytucjonalizm; Logika; Organizacja

EN

New institutionalism; Logic; Organisation

• Czasopismo: Organizacja i Kierowanie
• Rocznik: 2015
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 47--60

Twórcy

autor

Przemysław Hensel

• Uniwersytet Warszawski

Bibliografia

• Meyer J. W., Rowan B., Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and
• Ceremony, "American Journal of Sociology" 1977, Vol. 83, No. 2.
• DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W., The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, "American Sociological Review" 1983, Vol. 48, No. 2.
• Boxenbaum E., Jonsson S., Isomorphism, Diffusion and Decoupling, [in:] The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, Greenwood R., Oliver Ch., Suddaby R., Sahlin K. (eds.), SAGE Publications, Los Angeles 2008.
• Battilana J., D'Aunno T., Institutional Work and the Paradox of Embedded Agency, [in:] Institutional Work. Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organization, Lawrence T. B., Suddaby R., Leca B. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2009.
• Scott W. R., Institutions and Organizations. Ideas and Interests, SAGE Publications, Los Angeles 2008.
• Battilana J., Leca B., Boxenbaum E., How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship, "The Academy of Management Annals" 2009, Vol. 3, No. 1.
• Friedland R., Alford R. R., Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions, [in:] The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. (eds.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1991. Thornton P. H., Ocasio W., Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958-1990, "American Journal of Sociology" 1999, Vol. 105, No. 3.
• March J. G., Olsen J. P., The Logic of Appropriateness, [in:] The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, Moran M., Rein M., Goodin R. E. (eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford 2006.
• Berger L., Luckman T., Społeczne tworzenie rzeczywistości, PIW, Warszawa 1983.
• Thornton P. H., Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA 2004.
• Thornton P. H., Ocasio W., Lounsbury M., The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012.
• Greenwood R., Díaz A. M., Li S. X., Lorente J. C., The Multiplicity of Institutional Logics and the Heterogeneity of Organizational Responses, "Organization Science" 2010, Vol. 21, No. 2.
• Pache A.-C., Santos F., Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Conflicting Institutional Logics, "Academy of Management Journal" 2012, Vol. 56, No. 4.
• Saka A., The Cross-National Diffusion of Work Systems: Translation of Japanese Operations in the UK, "Organization Studies" 2004, Vol. 25, No. 2.
• Dunn M. B., Jones C., Institutional Logics and Institutional Pluralism: The Contestation of Care and Science Logics in Medical Education, 1967-2005, "Administrative Science Quarterly" 2010, Vol. 55, No. 1.
• Hensel P., Przyczyny popularności Nowego Zarządzania Publicznego, "Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie" 2010, nr 4 (17).
• Hensel P., Kulturowe bariery reformowania administracji publicznej - wyniki badania empirycznego, "Zarządzanie publiczne" 2011, No. 4 (18).
• Hood C., Public Management. The Word, The Movement, The Science, [in:] The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, Ferlie E., Lynn Jr. L. E., Pollitt Ch. (eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford 2005.
• Pollitt C., Dan S., Searching for Impacts in Performance-Oriented Management Reform, "Public Performance & Management Review" 2013, Vol. 37, No. 1.
• Lounsbury M., Institutional transformation and status mobility: The professionalization of the field of finance, "Academy of Management Journal" 2002, Vol. 45, No. 1.
• Townley B., The Role of Competing Rationalities in Institutional Change, "Academy of Management Journal" 2002, Vol. 45, No. 1.
• Lok J., Institutional Logics as Identity Projects, "Academy of Management Journal" 2010, Vol. 53, No. 6.
• Jay J., Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations, "Academy of Management Journal" 2013, Vol. 56, No. 1.
• Lander M. W., Koene B. A. S., Linssen S. N., Committed to professionalism: Organizational responses of mid-tier accounting firms to conflicting institutional logics, "Accounting Organizations and Society" 2013, Vol. 38, No. 2.
• van Gestel N., Hillebrand B., Explaining Stability and Change: The Rise and Fall of Logics in Pluralistic Fields, "Organization Studies" 2011, Vol. 32, No. 2.
• McPherson C. M., Sauder M., Logics in Action: Managing Institutional Complexity in a Drug Court, "Administrative Science Quarterly" 2013, Vol. 58, No. 2.
• Battilana J., Dorado S., Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations, "Academy of Management Journal" 2010, Vol. 53, No. 6.
• Meyer R. E., Hammerschmid G., Changing institutional logics and executive identities: A managerial challenge to public administration in Austria, "American Behavioral Scientist" 2006, Vol. 49, No. 7.
• Hensel P., Glinka B., Competing Logics and Semi-professionals in Polish Public Administration, [in:] Legal Professions at the Crossroads, Jemielniak D. (ed.), Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main 2014.
• Jarzabkowski P., Matthiesen J., Van de Ven A., Doing which work? A practice approach to institutional pluralism, [in:] Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations, Lawrence T. B., Suddaby R. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2009.
• Reay T., Hinings C. R., The Recomposition of an Organizational Field: Health Care in Alberta, "Organization Studies" 2005, Vol. 26, No. 3.
• Hensel P., Glinka B., Urzędnicy i przedsiębiorcy. Kulturowe bariery współpracy, Poltext, Warszawa 2012.
• Czarniawska B., Sevón G., Translating Organizational Change, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin 1996.
• Czarniawska-Joerges B., Exploring Complex Organizations: A cultural perspective, SAGE Publications, Newbury Park - London - New Delhi 1992.