Saving Morality : a Case against Moral Neutralism

• Autorzy: Andrei G. Zavaliy
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of this paper is to defend a position in metaethics, saving morality from certain reductionist attempts, and arguing that a moral point of view denotes a distinct attitude toward the world with a set of relatively stable conditions. I discuss the problem of demarcation between the moral and the non-moral domains, and contrast the two basic approaches - moral neutralism and moral descriptivism. Moral neutralism is defined as a view which builds no content requirements into the definition of moral rules, whereas moral descriptivism or essentialism places identifiable constraints on the content of an action-guiding principle if such a principle is to count as a moral, as opposed to a non-moral, rule. I show that adopting neutralism is tantamount to giving up ethical theory as a scholarly activity with a distinct subject matter altogether. It is further argued that W. Frankena's essentialist definition of morality, as well as a more recent view of Catherine Wilson, share a similar weakness and fall short from neutralizing neutralism. Finally, I propose a modification to the essentialist account of morality, which would significantly increase the resilience of such an account to attempts of reducing moral prescriptions to any action-guiding policy whatsoever, as long as such policy is sincerely adhered to and followed consistently. The proposed modification is described as a Realism constraint, and it refers to the connection between one's expectations of the outcome of observing a prohibition or following a certain rule and the actual consequences of following a given policy.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Morality; Philosophical thought

PL

Moralność; Poglądy filozoficzne

• Czasopismo: Studia Humana
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 1(2)
• Strony: 40--52

Twórcy

autor

Andrei G. Zavaliy

• American University of Kuwait

Bibliografia

• 1. Benedict, Ruth. Patterns of Culture. (1935). Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1989.
• 2. Bennett, Jonathan. "The Conscience of Huckleberry Finn." Philosophy, vol. 49, no. 188, 1974, pp. 123-34.
• 3. Frankena, William K. Ethics. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1963.
• 4. Garner, Richard. Beyond Morality. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1994.
• 5. Haidt, J. and Bjorklund, F. "Social Intuitionists Answer Six Questions about Moral
• 6. Psychology." Moral Psychology, vol. 2, 2008, pp. 181-218.
• 7. Hare, Richard M. Freedom and Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963.
• 8. Herman, Barbara. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Harvard University Press, 1996.
• 9. Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan (1651). ed. Edwin Curley, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1984.
• 10. Joyce, Richard. The Myth of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
• 11. Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785). Mary Gregor, trans. & ed.; intro. by C. M. Korsgaard. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001.
• 12. Lucretius, Titus Carus. On the Nature of Things (1st cent. B.C.E.). Tr. by W. H. D. Rouse. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1975.
• 13. Mackie, John L. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Penguin, 1977.
• 14. Mill, J. S. Utilitarianism. (1861). Roger Crisp ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
• 15. Milo, Ronald D. Immorality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
• 16. Nielsen, Kai. Why Be Moral? Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1989.
• 17. Sartre, Jean-Paul. "Existentialism." (1945) in Existentialism and Human Emotions, tr. Bernard Frechtman. New York: Philosophical Library, 1957: 9-40.
• 18. Turnbull, Colin. The Mountain People. Simon & Shuster, Touchstone edition, 1987.
• 19. Vetlesen, Arne Johan. Perception, Empathy, and Judgment: An Inquiry into the Preconditions of Moral Performance. The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994.
• 20. Wilson, Catherine. Moral Animals: Ideals and Constraints in Moral Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004.
• 21. Zavaliy, Andrei G. "Toward a Three-Dimensional Model of Moral Domain." Southwest Philosophical Studies, vol. 31, 2009, pp. 37-44.