The Use of Multi-Level Evaluation Approach in Research Projects Undertaken within Strategic Research Programmes

• Autorzy: Ludmiła Łopacińska , Adam Mazurkiewicz
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Evaluation of new technology solutions developed in strategic research programmes is one of the most important aspects ensuring competitiveness of modern knowledge based economies. The review presents a complex evaluation system, with two dimensions (formal and factual ones) taken into consideration by the authors, which enables the conduction of evaluation of research projects, in order to ensure their correct completion. The evaluation system was developed on the basis of the analysis of empirical case studies of research projects undertaken within strategic research programmes after a thorough examination of the aspects considered in the evaluation process, focusing particularly on the possibilities of introducing changes in the projects. The system is being implemented in the currently realised strategic research programme "Innovative Systems of Technical Support for Sustainable Development of Economy", coordinated by the Institute for Sustainable Technologies - National Research Institute from Poland.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Research & Development (R+D); Scientific-research work; Evaluation of programs

PL

Badania i rozwój (B+R); Prace naukowo-badawcze; Ocena programów

• Czasopismo: Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 14
• Numer: z. 7 Logistics Management
• Strony: 113--128

Twórcy

autor

Ludmiła Łopacińska

• Instytut Technologii Eksploatacji - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy w Radomiu

autor

Adam Mazurkiewicz

• Instytut Technologii Eksploatacji - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy w Radomiu

Bibliografia

• Arnold E., Mannik K., Rannala R., Reid A., Bayer B. and Ljungstrom S. (2008), Mid-term Evaluation of the Competence Centre Programme, Tallinn.
• Avellan F., Cederwall K. and Hartmann R. (2002), Hydraulic Turbine Research Programme. Evaluation report, Stockholm.
• Bannier Ch. (2005), Heterogeneous Multiple Bank Financing Under Uncertainty: Does It Reduce Inefficient Credit Decisions?, Working paper series. Johann-Wolfgang- Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften: Finance and Accounting.
• Bazhanov A. (2011), The Dependence of The Potential Sustainability of a Resource Economy On The Initial State: A Comparison Of Models Using The Example of Russian Oil Extraction, "Journal of the New Economic Association", Vol. 12.
• Chang Y.Ch., Shih Ch., Chieng W., Su Ch. (2010), Evaluating Impacts Of The MNE R&D Centre Programme On The National Innovation System In Taiwan, "Research Evaluation", Vol. 19.
• Commission Directive 1999/77/EC of 26 July 1999 Adapting To Technical Progress For The Sixth Time Annex I To Council Directive 76/769/EEC On The Approximation Of The Laws, Regulations And Administrative Provisions Of The Member States Relating To Restrictions On The Marketing And Use Of Certain Dangerous Substances And Preparations(Asbestos), 'Official Journal of the European Communities", L 207/18.
• Daigneault P.M., Jacob S. (2009), Toward Accurate Measurement of Participation. Rethinking the Conceptualization and Operationalization of Participatory Evaluation. "American Journal of Evaluation", Vol. 30.
• Henry N., Leather J. (2008), PARD - Third Interim Programme Report, Advantage West Midlands.
• Jakobsen L., Erdal T., Knudsen P.E., Hvidberg M. (2002), Evaluation Of The Programme For Interdisciplinary Materials Research Consortia, Oxford Research.
• Kandel E., Leshchinskii D., Yuklea H. (2004), VC fund's Limited Horizon As A Source Of Inefficiency, Social Science Research Network.
• Karakashian L., Walter M., Christopher A., Lucas T. (2006), Fear Of Negative Evaluation Affects Helping Behaviour: The Bystander Effect Revisited, "American Journal of Psychology", Vol. 8.
• Kazan-Allen L. (2003), The Asbestos War, "International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health", Vol. 9.
• Koponen P., Kalander J.K., Kuursisto M. (2008), FinNano Programme. Intermediate evaluation, Helsinki: TEKES.
• Linquiti, P., (2012), The Importance Of Integrating Risk In Retrospective Evaluations Of Research And Development, "Research Evaluation", Vol. 21.
• Lodl K., Stevens G. (2002), Coalition Sustainability. Long Term Successes & Lessons Learned, "Journal of Extension", Vol. 40.
• Łopacińska L. (2011), Ponadstandardowe metody ewaluacji strategicznych programów badawczych, "Problemy Eksploatacji" 3, Vol. 82.
• Marbbn C.A. (2009), Asbestos Risk Assessment, "The Journal of Undergraduate Biological Studies".
• Mazurkiewicz A., Karsznia W., Giesko T., Belina B. (2010), Metodyka Oceny Stopnia Dojrzałości Wdrożeniowej Innowacji Technicznych, "Problemy Eksploatacji", No 1.
• Mazurkiewicz A. (2009), 'Sprawozdania Z Realizacji Projektów Badawczych Zamawianych (PBZ) Objętych Programem Wieloletnim PW-004' pn.. Doskonalenie Systemów Rozwoju Innowacyjności W Produkcji I Eksploatacji W Latach 2004- 2008. Radom: ITeE-PIB.
• Ministry of National Education (2011), Decree Of The Ministry of National Education On The Classification Of Professions In Vocational Education.
• Pezzey J.C.V. (1992), Sustainable Development Concepts: An Economic Analysis, "World Bank Environment", paper No. 2.
• Polish Agency for Enterprise Development, (2010), Ocena Efektywności I Skuteczności Programu Bon Na Innowacje - raport końcowy, Warsaw.
• Pullen-Seufert N., Hall W. (2008), The Art Of Appropriate Evaluation 2008 - A Guide For Highway Safety Program Managers, University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Centre.
• Quillen R. (2011), Why Some Software Development Projects Fail And What You Can Do About It, Quillen Inftrastructure Technologies.
• Savaya R., Spiro S., Barak R.E. (2008), Sustainability Of Social Programs. A Comparative Case Studies Analysis, "American Journal of Evaluation", Vol. 29.
• Savaya R. (2012), Predictors Of Sustainability Of Social Programs, "American Journal of Evaluation", Vol. 33.
• Scriven M. (1994), Product Evaluation - The State Of The Art, "American Journal of Evaluation", Vol. 15.
• Stufflebeam D. (1994), Empowerment Evaluation, Objectivist Evaluation, And Evaluation Standards: Where The Future Of Evaluation Should Not Go and Where It Needs To Go, "American Journal of Evaluation", Vol. 15.
• TEKES (2006), PINTA - Clean Surfaces. 2002-2006, Technology Programme Report 17, Helsinki.
• Traill R. (2011), Asbestos As 'Toxic Short-Circuit' Optic-Fibre For UV Within The Cell-Net: Likely Roles And Hazards For Secret UV And IR Metabolism', "Journal of Physics": Conference Series 329: 012017.
• Weston T. (2004), Formative Evaluation For Implementation Evaluating Educational Technologies Applications And Lessons, "American Journal of Evaluation", Vol. 25.
• Scheirer M.A. (2005), Is Sustainability Possible? A Review And Commentary On Empirical Studies Of Program Sustainability, "American Journal of Evaluation", Vol. 26.
• Gamota G., Bentley W., Colwel, R.R., Herer P.J., Kahaner D., Kusuda T. et al. (1999), Japan's ERATO and PRESTO. Basic Research Programs, from http://www.wtec.org/ pdf/erato.pdf [online].
• Japan Science Technology Agency Office of Basic Research (2007), FY 2006 Basic research programs (CREST type, PRESTO type). Invitation For Application Of Research Proposals. Application Guideline. Volume 2. CREST Type Second Term (New Research Areas) PRESTO Type (All Research Areas), from http://www.jst. go.jp/kisoken/boshuu/h19/boshuu/jigyou/en/guidelines/guidelineh19.pdf [online].
• Performance Management Network Inc., (2004), h2 Early Adopters Program (h2EA) - six months progress report, from http://ito.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/itooti.nsf/ vwapj/6month_progress_report_e.pdf/$FILE/6month_progress_report_e.pdf [online]
• Rezendes L. (1994), Advanced Technology. Proposal Review Process And Treatment Of Foreign-Owned Businesses, from http://archive.gao.gov/t2pbat4/150663.pdf [online].