Barriers to New Practice Emerging
The article discusses the issues of barriers to creating practice from the processual perspective in management sciences. The notion of practice is a relatively important cognitive concept in the processual approach to management. It is connected with the issues of the organizational change and draws on Anthony Giddens's concept of structuration. Management issues understood in this way are presented in the context of the specific nature of enterprises' functioning as part of their everyday actions. This article is a theoretical and empirical analysis of the issues discussed. The goal of the research is to recognize barriers to emerging practice in an enterprise. The researcher used qualitative methods. As part of this research, a semi-structured interview was conducted in an enterprise representing the textile and clothes sector. Barriers to practice development are of processual, resource and environmental character. The most important barriers to practice creation are those which are sector-specific and environmental. (original abstract)
- Bourdieu P. (2005), The social structures of the economy, Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Creswell J.W. Research design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd ed. California: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2009.
- Dacin M.T. and Dacin P.A. (2012), Traditions as Institutionalized Practice: Implications for Deinstitutionalization [in:] Organizational Institutionalism, Greenwood R. and et.al. (ed.), SAGE Publications, 3rd ed., London.
- Feldman M.S. and Pentland B. Re-theorizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly. 2003, Vol. 48, Iss. 1, pp. 94-118.
- Fenno R.F. Observation, Context, and Sequence in the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review. 1986, Vol. 80, Iss 1, pp. 3-15.
- Giddens A. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: California University Press, 1984.
- Gilbert C. Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal. 2005, Vol. 48, No. 5, pp. 741-763.
- Hannan M.T. and Freeman J. (1977) The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology. 1977, 82 (5), pp. 929-964.
- Haunschild P. and Chandler D. (2012) Institutional - Level Learning: Learning as Source of Institutional Change [in:] Organizational Institutionalism, Greenwood R. and et.al. (ed.), SAGE Publications, 3rd ed., London.
- Jarzabkowski P. Strategy as practice. An activity based approach. SAGE Strategy Series. London: SAGE Publications, 2005.
- Lazaric N. Routines and routinization: an exploration of some micro-cognitive foundations [in:] Becker M.C. (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Routines, Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar. 2010, pp. 205-227.
- March J. (1988), Decisions and Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Moorman C. and Miner A.S. The impact of organizational memory on the new product performance and creativity. Journal of Marketing Research. 1997, Vol. 34, Iss. 1, pp. 91-106.
- Nelson R. and Winter S. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.
- Olivier C. (1992), The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization, "Organization Studies", 13/4, pp. 563-588.
- Patora-Wysocka Z. (2015), The institutionalization of spontaneous changes in enterprises: A processual perspective, Journal of Contemporary Management, submitted paper.
- Polanyi M. (1958), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, University of Chicago Press.
- Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovations. Glencoe: Free Press, 1962.
- Schau H.J., Muñiz Jr. A.M., Arnould E.J. (2009), How Brand Community Practices Create Value, "Journal of Marketing", Vol. 73, pp. 30-51.
- Sułkowski Ł. (2012), Epistemologia i metodologia zarządzania, PWE, Warszawa.