Towards a Dialogical Sociology

• Autorzy: Michał Kaczmarczyk
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Most sociological action theories and typologies were not able to establish interdependencies and sequences between different types of action. They also ignored the existential meaning of the choices the typologies implicitly involved. The imaginative dispositions and the ability to critically examine one's own presuppositions are shown to constitute action as a future-oriented, self-expressing, and interpersonal phenomenon. Both dimensions may be found in the Socratic dialogical attitude but should not be taken as constituting a normative nor even a desirable type of action. The article identifies several limits of dialogue and its relationships with other types of action defined according to the same criteria.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Sociological theories; Existentialism; Social interaction; Social dialogue

PL

Teorie socjologiczne; Egzystencjalizm; Interakcje społeczne; Dialog społeczny

• Czasopismo: Polish Sociological Review
• Rocznik: 2016
• Numer: nr 1 (193)
• Strony: 3--17

Twórcy

autor

Michał Kaczmarczyk

• University of Gdańsk

Bibliografia

• Alexander, J. C. 1987. Twenty Lectures. Sociological Theory Since World War II. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
• Berger, L. P., Luckmann T. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City: Anchor Books.
• Blumenberg, H. 2012. Wirklichkeiten in denen wir leben. Stuttgart: Reclam.
• Bohm, D. 1996. On Dialogue. New York: Routledge.
• Boudon, R. 1993. European Sociology: The Identity Lost?, in: B. Nedelmann, P. Sztompka (eds.), Sociology in Europe. In Search of Identity. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
• Boudon, R. 2001. The Origin of Values. Sociology and Philosophy of Beliefs. New Brunswick: Transaction.
• Boudon, R. 2003. Beyond Rational Choice Theory, Annual Review of Sociology 29: 1-21.
• Camic, Ch., Joas, H. 2004. The Dialogical Turn, in: Ch. Camic, H. Joas (eds.), The Dialogical Turn. New Roles for Sociology in the Postdisciplinary Age. Lanham: Rowman&Littlefield, pp. 1-19.
• Castoriadis, C. 2002. On Plato's Statesman. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Collins, R. 1998. The Sociology of Philosophies. A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Cook, G. A. 1993. George Herbert Mead. The Making of a Social Pragmatist. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
• Cooper, J. M. 2012. Pursuits of Wisdom. Six Ways of Life in Ancient Philosophy from Socrates to Plotinus. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Dewey, J. 2008. Democracy and Education. Lexington: Seven Treasures.
• Farrell, M. P. 2001. Collaborative Circles. Freindship Dynamics & Creative Work. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Goffman, E. 1986. Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
• Gouldner, A. W. 1965. Enter Plato. Classical Greece and the Origins of Social Theory. New York: Basic Books.
• James, W. 1948. Essays in Pragmatism. New York: Hafner Press.
• Joas, H. 2012. Die Sakralität der Person. Eine neue Genealogie der Menschenrechte. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
• Lepenies, W. 1998. Melancholie und Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
• Levine, D. 1985. The Flight from Ambiguity. Essays in Social and Cultural Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Levine, D. 1995. Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Lovejoy, A. O. 1964 [1936]. The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Löwith, K. 1993 [1982]. Max Weber and Karl Marx. London: Routledge.
• McKeon, R. 1990. Freedom and History and Other Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Mead, G. H. 1932. The Philosophy of the Present, Arthur E. Murphy (ed.). La Salle: Open Court.
• Mead, G. H. 1936. Movements of Thought in the Ninetheen Century, Merritt H. Moore (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago.
• Mead, G. H. 1938. The Philosophy of the Act, Charles W. Morris, (ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago.
• Parsons, T. 1951. The Social System. New York: Free Press.
• Parsons, T. 1968 [1937]. The Structure of Social Action. New York: Free Press.
• Peirce, Ch. S. 1992. The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings. Volume I (1867-1893). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• Robinson, R. 1953. Plato 's Earlier Dialectic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Schiavone, A. 2012. The Invention of Law in the West. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Small, A. 1906. The Relation Between Sociology and Other Sciences, American Journal of Sociology 12: 11-31.
• Stark, W. 1958. The Sociology of Knowledge. An Essay in Aid of a Deeper Understanding of the History of Ideas. Glencoe: The Free Press.
• Weber, M. 1976 [1922]. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
• Weber, M. 1988 [1902-1903]. Roscher und Knies und die logischen Probleme der historischen Nationalökonomie, in: M. Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, pp. 1-145.
• Znaniecki, F. 1984. Społeczne role uczonych, translated by Jerzy Szacki. Warszawa: PWN.