PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2015 | 7 | nr 4 | 5--19
Tytuł artykułu

A Holistic Synthesis of the Organisation Theories

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Much literature exists on the topic of 'organisation'. Many different academic disciplinary areas stake their claim to aspects of business organisation. The social sciences offer many different perspectives of the phenomena associated with it; as different lenses, through which the object is perceived very differently. According to social constructivists, the business organisation is socially constructed. For psychologists, it exists at the nexus of individual human needs. For economists, the business organisation operates as a mechanism responding to signals of supply and demand. In this paper the business organisation is re-imaged as an entity existing within, and comprised of, chaotic systems. On the basis of a synthesis of seminal theory this paper attempts to offer a holistic perspective of business organisations; that 'pulls together' these multidisciplinary perspectives. On the basis of this synthesis, it is argued that the organisational context is inherently endogenous, and that qualitative research methods might offer management scientists a more valid perspective of the relationships within organisations than empirical methods can. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
7
Numer
Strony
5--19
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • University of Johannesburg, South Africa
  • University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
Bibliografia
  • Allen P.M. (1998). Dynamic models of evolving systems. System Dynamics Review, 4: 109-130.
  • Caterino M.S., Cho S., and Sperling F.A.H. 2000. The Current State of Insect Molecular Systematics: A Thriving Tower of Babel. Annual Review of Entomology, 45: 1-54.
  • Coase R.H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4(16), 386-405.
  • Grant R.M. 1996. Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17:109-122.
  • Hannan M.T., and Freeman J. 1977. The Population Ecology of Organizations. The American Journal of Sociology, 82(5):929-964.
  • Klein K.J., Conn A.B., Smith D.B., & Sorra J.S. (2001). Is Everyone in Agreement? An Exploration of Within-Group Agreement in Employee Perceptions of the Work Environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 2-16.
  • Klein K.J., & Kozlowski S.W.J. (2000). From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211-236.
  • Levy D. 1994. Chaos Theory and Strategy: Theory, Application, and Managerial Implications. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 167-178.
  • Mayer K.J., and Sparrowe R.T. 2013. Integrating theories in AMJ articles. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 917-922.
  • Mills A. 2010. Complexity Science. An introduction (and invitation) for actuaries. Available at: http://www.google.co.za/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.soa.org%2Ffiles%2Fresearch%2Fprojects%2Fresearch-complexity-report.pdf&ei=YwzQUZWjE4TcPZbIgdgB&usg=AFQjCNFfAM1LYUUJ3TBePDucLP_hj4R2qA&sig2=FSEuDQiC8jAKdlrpoAMehA&bvm=bv.48572450,d.ZWU (Accessed 30 June 2013)
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171426883

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.