Paradoksy zaufania międzyorganizacyjnego

• Autorzy: Karolina Mazur , Zdzisław Kulczyk

Warianty tytułu

The Paradoxes of Interorganizational Trust

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

W artykule przedstawiono wyniki systematycznego przeglądu literatury dotyczącej problemu zaufania w relacjach międzyorganizacyjnych. Przedmiotem analizy było 66 artykułów pełnotekstowych o charakterze naukowym dotyczących zaufania międzyorganizacyjnego i jego następników (outcomes). W wyniku analizy artykułów wyodrębniono cztery potencjalne typy paradoksów zaufania międzyorganizacyjnego: paradoks zaufanie-oportunizm w klasycznej formie, paradoks zaufanie-oportunizm w ujęciu teorii gier, paradoks osadzenia oraz paradoks asymetrii zaufania w relacjach międzykulturowych. Po dokonaniu analizy autorzy uznali, że wprawdzie opisywane koncepcje poważnie różnią się od siebie, ale raczej w zakresie podejścia do tego samego problemu - ufać-nie ufać, rozpatrywanego z różnych punktów widzenia(abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

This paper presents the initial results of our systematic review of 66 studies. The analysis included articles from electronic databases. The articles concentrated on interorganizational trust and its outcomes. Four types of potential interorganizational trust paradoxes were distinguished: classic form of trust-opportunism paradox, the paradox of trust-opportunism from the view of game theory, paradox of embeddedness and the paradox of asymmetry of trust. The analysis has not given any crucial solution but only a suggestion that there are no different types of paradoxes, instead there is only one paradox: trust-opportunism which can be analyzed from different points of view(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Zaufanie; Zaufanie organizacyjne; Paradoks

EN

Trust; Organizational trust; Paradox

• Czasopismo: Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
• Rocznik: 2016
• Numer: nr 421 Sieci międzyorganizacyjne, procesy i projekty w erze paradoksów
• Strony: 386--396

Twórcy

autor

Karolina Mazur

• Uniwersytet Zielonogórski

autor

Zdzisław Kulczyk

• WPPHU ,,AXA"

Bibliografia

• Axelrod R., 1984, The Complexity of Cooperation, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
• Blau P., 1964, Exchange and Power in Social Life, Wiley, New York.
• Coleman J., 1990, Foundations of Social Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
• Czakon W., 2012, Paradoks osadzenia sieci - uwarunkowania metodologiczne, [w:] Krupski R. (red.), Zarządzanie strategiczne. Quo vadis?, Prace Naukowe WWSZIP, vol. 22, no. 2, s. 237-246.
• Czakon W., 2015, Procedura systematycznego przeglądu literatury, [w:] Czakon W. (red.), Podstawy metodologii badań w naukach o zarządzaniu, Wolters-Kluwer Business, Warszawa, s. 119-139.
• Deutsch M., 1960, Trust, trustworthiness, and the F-scale, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, vol. 61, no. 1, s. 138-140.
• Drabik E., 2005, Zastosowanie teorii gier w ekonomii i zarządzaniu, Wydawnictwo SGGW, Warszawa.
• Dyer J.H., 1997, Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 7, s. 535-556.
• Frank R.H., 1987, If homo economicus could choose his own utility function, would he choose one with a conscience?, American Economic Review, vol. 77, no. 4, s. 593-604.
• Gambetta D., 1988, Can we trust in trust?, [w:] Gambetta D. (red.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, Blackwell, New York, s. 213-237.
• Granovetter M., 1985, Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 91, no. 3, s. 481-510.
• Gulati R., 1995, Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances, The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 38, no. 1, s. 85-112.
• Güth W., Kliemt H., 1994. Competition or cooperation: On the evolutionary economics of trust, exploitation and moral attitudes, Metroeconomica, vol. 45, no. 2, s. 155-187.
• Heide J.B., John G., 1992, Do norms matter in marketing, Journal of Marketing, vol. 56, no. 2, s. 32-44.
• Hodgson G.M., 1996, Corporate culture and the nature of the firm, [w:] Groenewegen J. (red.), Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
• James, H.S., 2002, The trust paradox: A survey of economic inquiries into the nature of trust and trustworthiness, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 47, no. 3, s. 291-307.
• Koza K.L., Dant R.P., 2007, Effects of relationship climate, control mechanism, and communications on conflict resolution behavior and performance outcomes, Journal of Retailing, vol. 83, no. 3, s. 279-296.
• Lado A., Dant R., Tekleab A., 2008, Trust-opportunism paradox, relationalism, and performance in interfirm relationships: Evidence from the retail industry, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 29, no. 4, s. 401-423.
• La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R.W., 1997, Trust in large organizations. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, vol. 87, no. 1, s. 333-338.
• Lazzarini S.G., Miller G.J., Zenger T.R, 2008, Dealing with the paradox of embeddedness: The role of contracts and trust in facilitating movement out of committed relationships, Organization Science, vol. 19, no. 5, s. 709-728.
• Lewicki R.J., Bunker B.B., 1996, Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships, [w:] Kramer R.M., Tyler T.R. (red.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, s. 114-139.
• Macneil I.R., 1986, Exchange revisited: Individual utility and social solidarity, Ethics, vol. 96, no. 3, s. 567-593.
• Mayer R.C., Davis J.H., Schoorman F.D., 1995, An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no. 3, s. 709-734.
• Morgan R.M., Hunt S.D., 1994, The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing, Journal of Marketing, vol. 58, no. 3, s. 24-38.
• Muris T.J., 1981, Opportunistic behavior and the law of contracts, Minnesota Law Review, vol. 65, no. 4, s. 521-590.
• Powell W.W., 1990, Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization, [w:] Staw B.M., Cummings L.L. (red.), Research in Organizational Behavior, JAI Press, Greenwich, s. 295-336.
• Rindfleisch A., Heide J., 1997. Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future, Journal of Marketing, vol. 61, no. 4, s. 30-54.
• Ring P.S., Van de Ven A.H., 1992, Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 13, no. 7, s. 483-498.
• Rousseau D.M., Sitkin S.B., Burt R.S., Camerer C., 1998, Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust, Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, no. 3, s. 393-404.
• Taylor M., 1987, The Possibility of Cooperation, Cambridge University Press, New York.
• Uzzi B., 1997, Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 1, s. 35-67.
• Walker G., Weber D., 1984, A transaction cost approach to make or buy decisions, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 3, s. 373-391.
• Williamson O.E., 1975, Market and Hierarchies, Free Press, New York.
• Williamson O.E., 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, The Free Press, Nowy Jork.
• Williamson O.E., 1993a, Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 36, no. 1, s. 453-486.
• Williamson O.E., 1993b, Opportunism and its critics, Managerial & Decisions Economics, vol. 14, no. 2, s. 97-107.
• Yamagishi T., Cook K.S., Watabe M., 1998, Uncertainty, trust, and commitment formation in the United States and Japan, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 104, no. 1, s. 165-194.
• Zaheer A., Kamal D.F., 2011, Creating trust in piranha-infested waters. The confluence of buyer, supplier and host country contexts, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 42, no. 1, s. 48-55.
• Zaheer A., McEvily B., Perrone V., 1998, Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance, Organization Science, vol. 9, no. 2, s. 141-159.
• Zaheer A., Venkatraman N., 1995, Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 16, no. 5, s. 132-145.
• Zaheer S., Zaheer A., 2006, Trust across borders, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 37, no. 1, s. 21-29.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15611/pn.2016.421.32