PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2016 | 86 | nr 142 | 95--117
Tytuł artykułu

Extended Audit Reporting : an Insight from the Auditing Profession in Poland

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Rozszerzony raport z badania sprawozdania finansowego : z perspektywy biegłego rewidenta w Polsce
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The audit-reporting model has been on the agenda of researchers and regulators for a long time. The recent regulatory proposals, consultation papers, discussion and research reports on audit reporting have intensified the discussion regarding whether the current standard audit report communicates the appropriate information to the users of the report. The Polish auditing model is an interesting case to study in the context of audit reporting. Poland already has experience in the preparation of an additional report, which is aimed at providing more information to all stakeholders. The paper seeks to address two questions. The first one is to what extent the Polish extended audit report contributes to the reduction of the expectation and information gaps, and the second question is about the possibilities of improvements of the audit report in general. Based on our interview findings, we conclude that the auditors perceive the audit report to be generally useful for its users. However, analysis of the data provides mixed evidence with regard to the extended audit report. Auditors acknowledge the usefulness of the extended audit report to report on additional issues and concerns but, at the same time, the standard form of the extended audit report as prescribed in the Polish Auditing Standards is found to have little information value to its users. (original abstract)
Model sprawozdawczości wyników pracy audytorów finansowych od dłuższego czasu znajduje się w obszarze zainteresowań zarówno badaczy, jak i regulatorów. Ostatnie propozycje regulacyjne, opublikowane dokumenty konsultacyjne, dyskusje i badania naukowe dotyczące raportowania audytorów finansowych nasiliły dyskusję o tym, czy obecne standardy raportowania zawierają użyteczne informacje dla ich użytkowników. Polski model raportowania audytorów finansowych może być interesującym przypadkiem do analizy ze względu na od dawna już istniejący obowiązek przygotowania dwóch raportów: krótkiej formy opinii audytora finansowego o sprawozdaniach finansowych oraz dłuższego w formie raportu z badania. Celem artykułu jest uzyskanie odpowiedzi na dwa pytania. Po pierwsze, czy publikowanie rozszerzonego raportu z badania audytora finansowego wpływa na ograniczenie luki audytu w Polsce. Po drugie, czy istnieją możliwości zwiększenia wartości informacyjnej raportowania przez audytorów finansowych na bazie doświadczeń polskich. Na podstawie przeprowadzonych wywiadów badawczych można stwierdzić, że audytorzy finansowi postrzegają sporządzaną przez siebie opinię o sprawozdaniach finansowych za użyteczną dla użytkowników tego dokumentu. Odpowiedź nie jest jednak tak jednoznaczna w przypadku rozszerzonego raportu z audytu (raportu z badania). Audytorzy potwierdzają jego przydatność, ale jednocześnie wskazują, że to sprawozdanie w jego standardowej formie, określonej w polskich standardach rewizji finansowej, ma ograniczoną przydatność dla użytkowników. (abstrakt oryginalny)
Rocznik
Tom
86
Numer
Strony
95--117
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Kozminski University
  • Kozminski University
  • Mennica Polska od 1766, Sp. z o.o.
Bibliografia
  • Ahrens T., Dent J. (eds) (1998), Accounting and organisations: realising the richness of field study re-search, "Journal of Management Accounting Research", 10 (1), pp. 1-39.
  • Barlett S.A., Chandler R.A. (1999), The private shareholder, corporate governance and the role of the annual report, "Journal of Business Law", September, pp. 415-428.
  • Chen K.C.W., Church B.K. (1996), Going concern opinions and the market's reaction to bankruptcy filing, "The Accounting Review", 71 (1), pp. 117-128.
  • Church B.K., Davis S.M., McCracken S.A. (2008), The auditor's reporting model: a literature overview and research synthesis, "Accounting Horizons", 22 (1), pp. 69-90.
  • Coram P., Mock T., Turner J., Gray G. (2011), The communicative value of the auditor's report, "Australian Accounting Review", 21 (3), pp. 235-252.
  • Duréndez Gómez-Guillamó A. (2003), The usefulness of the audit report in investment and financing decisions, "Journal of Managerial Auditing", 18 (6-7), pp. 549-559.
  • EU (2011), Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Specific Requirements Regarding Audit of Public-interest Entities, European Commission, Brussels.
  • EU (2010), Green Paper. Audit Policy: Lessons from the Crisis, October, European Commission, Brussels.
  • Gabrusewicz W. (ed.) (2010), Audyt sprawozdań finansowych [Audit of Financial Statements], PWE, Warszawa, pp. 27-33.
  • Gay G., Schelluch P., Baines A. (1998), Perceptions of messages conveyed by review and audit reports, "Accounting, Auditing and Accountability", 11 (4), pp. 472-492.
  • Ghicas D.C., Papadaki A., Siougle G., Sougiannis T. (2008), The relevance of quantifiable audit qualifications in the valuation of IPOs, "Review of Accounting Studies", 13 (4), pp. 512-550.
  • Glover H., Reidenbach M. (2012), Auditor reporting model modifications: practical insights from the academic community, "Current Issues in Auditing", 6 (1), pp. C7-C14.
  • Gold A., Gronewold U., Pott C. (2012), The ISA 700 auditor's report and the audit expectation gap - do additional explanations matter?, "International Journal of Auditing", 16 (2); pp. 101-129.
  • Guiral-Contreras A., Gonzalo-Angulo J.A., Rodgers W. (2007), Information content and recency effect on the audit report in loan rating decisions, "Accounting and Finance", 47 (2), pp. 285-304.
  • Gray G.L., Turner J.L., Coram P.J., Mock T.J. (2011), Perceptions and misperceptions regarding the unqualified auditor's report by financial statement preparers, users and auditors, "Accounting Horizons", 25 (4), pp. 659-684.
  • Hackenbrack K., Knechel R. (1997), Resource allocation decisions in audit engagements, "Contemporary Accounting Research", 14 (3), pp. 481-499.
  • Hatherly D., Innes J., Brown T. (1991), The expanded audit report - an empirical investigation, "Accounting and Business Research", 21 (84), pp. 311-319.
  • Humphrey Ch., Kausar A., Loft A., Woods M. (2011), Regulating audit beyond the crisis: a critical discussion of the EU Green Paper, "European Accounting Review", 20 (3) pp. 431-458.
  • Innes J., Brown T., Hatherly D. (1997), The expanded audit report - a research study within the development of SAS 600, "Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal", 10 (5), pp. 702-717.
  • IAASB (International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board) (2011), Enhancing the Value of Auditor Reporting: Exploring Options for Change. Consultation Paper, May, New York.
  • IOSCO (International Organization of Securities Commissions) (2009), Auditor Communications. Consultation Report, September, Madrid.
  • Jaruga A. (1993), Changing rules of accounting in Poland, "European Accounting Review", 2 (1), pp. 115-126.
  • Jaruga A.A. (1976), Some developments of auditing in Poland, "International Journal of Accounting Education and Research", 12 (1), pp. 101-109.
  • Jaruga A.A. (1972), Problems of uniform accounting principles in Poland, "The International Journal of Accounting", 8 (1), pp. 25-42.
  • Knechel W.R., Salterio S.E., Ballou B. (2007), Auditing: Assurance and Risk, Thomson South-Western, Mason.
  • Krzywda D., Bailey D., Schroeder M. (1998), The development of the role of the statutory audit in the transitional Polish economy, "The European Accounting Review", 7 (3), pp. 407-440.
  • Kosmala MacLullich K., Sucher P. (2004), A Comparative Analysis of Auditor Independence in Economics in Transition, Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland, Edinburgh.
  • MARC (Maastricht Accounting Auditing and Information Management Research Center) (2011), A Framework for Extended Audit Reporting, Research Project Commissioned by ACCA, July, Maastricht.
  • McEnroe J.E., Martens S.C. (2001), Auditors' and investors' perception of the 'expectation gap', "Accounting Horizons", 15 (4), pp. 345-358.
  • McKinnon J. (1988), Reliability and validity in field research: some strategies and tactics, "Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal", 1 (1), pp. 34-54.
  • Mock T., Turner J., Gray G., Coram P. (2009), The Unqualified Auditor's Report: A Study of User Perceptions, Effects on User Decisions and Decision Processes, and Directions for Future Re-search, an unpublished report to the Auditing Standards Board and the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (June), New York, NY.
  • O'Reilly D.M., Leitch R. A., Tuttle B. (2006), An experimental test of the interaction of the insurance and information-signaling hypotheses in auditing, "Contemporary Accounting Research", 23 (1), pp. 267-289.
  • Patton M.Q. (2002), Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
  • Pfaff J. (2007), Wpływ rewizji finansowej na wiarygodność sprawozdania finansowego [Impact of the Financial Auditing the Reliability of the Financial Statements], Akademia Ekonomiczna im. Karola Adamieckiego w Katowicach, Katowice.
  • Porter B., O'Hogartaigh C., Baskerville R. (2009), Report on Research Conducted in the United Kingdom and New Zealand in 2008. Investigating the Audit Expectation-Performance Gap and User's Under-standing of, and Desired Improvements to, the Audit's Report, Research Commissioned by the IAASB, Exeter.
  • Pucheta Martinez M.C., Martinez A.V., Garcia Benau M.A. (2004), Reactions of the Spanish capital market to qualified audit reports, "European Accounting Review", 13 (4), pp. 689-711.
  • Quick R. (2012), EC Green Paper proposals and audit quality, "Accounting in Europe", 9 (1), pp. 17-38.
  • Silverman D. (1985), Qualitative Methodology and Sociology: Describing the Social World, Glower, Aldershot.
  • Schneider A., Church B.K. (2008), The effect of auditors' internal control opinions on loan decisions, "Journal of Accounting and Public Policy", 27 (1), pp. -18.
  • Schroeder M. (2007), Expanding Statutory Auditor Commentary: the Role of Long Form Audit Reports in Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Polish Audit Profession, Full Research Report, ESRC End of Award Report, RES-000-22-1782, ESRC, Swindon.
  • Schroeder M. (1999), A description of the contents of the long-form statutory audit reports of a sample of Polish listed companies for 1996, "European Accounting Review", 8 (1), pp. 115-137.
  • Turner J.L., Mock T.J., Coram P.J., Gray G. L. (2010), Improving transparency and relevance of auditor communications with financial statement users, "Current Issues in Auditing", 4 (1), pp. A1-A8.
  • Vanstraelen A., Schelleman C., Meuwissen R., Hoffman I. (2012), The audit reporting debate: seemingly intractable problem and feasible solutions, "European Accounting Review", 21 (2), pp. 193-216.
  • Wright M., Robbie K. (1996), Venture capitalist, unquoted equity investment appraisal and the role of accounting information, "Accounting and Business Research", 26 (2), pp. 153-168.
  • Yin R. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, Newbury Park.
  • Uchwała nr 1608/38/2010 Krajowej Rady Biegłych Rewidentów z 16 lutego 2010 r. [Resolution no. 1608/38/2010 National Council of Statutory Auditors on 16 February 2010].
  • Uchwała nr 144/66/96 Krajowej Rady Biegłych Rewidentów z 16 stycznia 1996 r. [Resolution no. 144/66/96 National Council of Statutory Auditors on 16 January 1996].
  • Ustawa z 29 września 1994 r. o rachunkowości [Accounting Act, 1994], Dz.U. 2002, no. 76, item 694 (consolidated text).
  • Ustawa z 13 października 1994 r. o biegłych rewidentach i ich samorządzie [Audit Act, 1994], Dz.U. 1994, no. 121, item 592.
  • Ustawa z 19 października 1991 r. o badaniu i ogłaszaniu sprawozdań finansowych oraz biegłych rewidentach i ich samorządzie [Audit Act, 1991], Dz.U. 1991, no. 111, item 480.
  • PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) (2011), Concept Release on Possible Revisions to PCAOB Standards Related to Reports on Audited Financial Statements and Related Amendments to PCAOB Standards, June, Washington, DC. Retrieved from: http://pcaobus.org/Rules/Rulemaking/ Docket034/Concept_Release.pdf (access February 15th, 2015).
  • PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) (2011), PCAOB Roundtable on Auditor's Reporting Model. Retrieved from: http://pcaobus.org/Rules/Rulemaking/Docket034/Briefing_Paper.pdf (access February 15th, 2015).
  • PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) (2010), ACAP Committee's Recommendation Relating to the Auditor's Reporting Model. Retrieved from: http://pcaobus.org/News/Events/Documents/04072010_SAGMeeting/Auditor's_Reporting_Model.pdf (access February 15th, 2015).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171429251

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.