Social Entrepreneurship and its Hybridity in Determining Resource Challenges and Chances

• Autorzy: Marzena Starnawska
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

In this conceptual paper the author aims to grasp what are the particular challenges and opportunities in social entrepreneurship in terms of resource access and mobilization, considering the hybrid nature of social enterprise. To this end the author points to the nature of hybridity and discusses what advantages and disadvantages are inherent in financial, human and physical resource access for social enterprises as hybrid organizations. This discussion is enriched by analysing intangible resources such as relational, institutional and cultural that distinguish social entrepreneurship as an institutional type of entrepreneurship as well. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Przedsiębiorczość; Przedsiębiorczość społeczna; Zasoby niematerialne; Organizacje hybrydowe

EN

Entrepreneurship; Social entrepreneurship; Intangible assets; Hybrid organizations

• Czasopismo: Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 4
• Numer: nr 5
• Strony: 38--53

Twórcy

autor

Marzena Starnawska

• Gdańsk University of Technology

Bibliografia

• Alter, K., 2007, Social enterprise typology , http://www.virtueventures.com/setypolo- gy.pdf [access: April 2015].
• Austin, J., Stevenson, H., Wei-Skillern, J., 2006, Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1-22.
• Baker, T., Nelson, R., 2005, Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction Through Entrepreneurial Bricolage, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 50, pp. 329-366.
• Battilana, J., Dorado, S., 2010, Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1419-1440.
• Besharov, M., Smith, W.K., 2012, Multiple Logics within Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Model of Organizational Hybridity, Cornell University Working Paper, no. 35.
• Billis, D., 2010, Towards a Theory of Hybrid Organizations, in: Billis, D. (ed.), Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 46-69.
• Cieplewska-Kowalik, A., Pieliński, B., Starnawska, M., Szymańska, A., 2015, Looking for Social Enterprise Models in Poland: Institutional and Historical Context, ICSEM Working Papers no. 2015-11, Liege: The International Comparative Social Enterprise Models (ICSEM) Project.
• Cornelius, N., Todres, M., Janjuha-Jivraj, S., Woods, A., Wallace, J., 2008, Corporate Social Responsibility and the Social Enterprise, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 355-370.
• Dacin, P.A., Dacin, M.T., Matear, M., 2010, Social Entrepreneurship: Why don't Need a New Theory and How we Move Forward from Her , Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 37-57.
• Dart, R., 2004, The Legitimacy of Social Enterprise, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 411-424.
• Dees, J.G., Anderson, B.B., 2006, Framing a Theory of Social Entrepreneurship : Building on Two Schools of Practice and Thought, in: Mosher-Williams, R. (ed.), Research on Social Entrepreneurship, ARNOVA occasional paper series, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 39-66.
• Defourny, J., Nyssens, M., 2012, The EMES Approach of Social Enterprise in a Comparative Perspective, Working Paper 12/03, EMES European Research Network.
• Di Domenico, M.L., Haugh, H., Tracey, P., 2010, Social Bricolage: Theorizing Social Value Creation in Social Enterprises , Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 34, pp. 681-703.
• DiMaggio, P.J., 1988, Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory, in: Zucker, L.G. (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 3-21.
• Doherty, B., Haugh, H., Lyon, F., 2014, Social Enterprises as as Hybrid Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda, International Journal of Management Reviews,vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 417-436.
• Fligstein, N., 1997, Social Skill and Institutional Theory, American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 397-405.
• Haugh, H., 2006, A Research Agenda for Social Entrepreneurship?, Social Enterprise Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-12.
• Haugh, H., 2007, Community-led Social Venture Creation, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 161-182.
• Jay, J., 2013, Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 137-159.
• Kerlin, J., 2006, Social Enterprise in the United States and Abroad: Learning from Our Differences, in: Mosher-Williams R. (ed.), Research on social Entrepreneur -ship, ARNOVA occasional paper series, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 105-125.
• Lee, M., 2014, Mission and Markets? The Viability of Hybrid Social Ventures, Academy of Management Perspectives, January, pp. 1-43, accessed https://www.rotman. utoronto.ca/-/media/Files/Programs-andAreas/Strategy/papers/The%20Viabili- ty%20of%20Hybrid%20Social%20Ventures_Matthew%20Lee.pdf [access: October 2015].
• Liu, G., Ko, W.W., 2012, Organizational Learning and Marketing Capability Development: a Study of the Charity Retailing Operations of British Social Enterprise, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 580-608.
• Mair, J., Marti, I., 2006, Social Entrepreneurship Research: a Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight, Journal of World Business, vol. 41, pp. 36-44.
• Mair, J., Marti, I., 2009, Social Entrepreneurship in and Around Institutional Voids, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 419-435.
• Minkoff, D.C., 2002, The Emergence of Hybrid Organizational forms: Combining Identity-based Service Provision and Political Action, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 377-401.
• Oster S.M., 1995, Strategic Management for Non-profit Organizations, Theory and cases, Oxford University Press, New York.
• Pache, A.C., Santos, F., 2010, When Worlds Collide: The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands, The Academy of Management Review, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 455-476.
• Peattie, K., Morley, A., 2008, Eight Paradoxes of the Social Enterprise Research Agenda, Social Enterprise Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 91-107.
• Peattie, K., Morley, A., 2006, Social Enterprises: Diversity and Dynamics , Contexts and Contributions , Cardiff, ESRC Centre for Business Research, Cardiff University, UK.
• Perrini, F., Marino, A., 2006, The Basis for Launching a New Social Entrepreneurial Ve n t u r e, in: Perrini, F. (ed.), The New Social Entrepreneurship: What Awaits Social Entrepreneurial Ve n t u r e s, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 46-64.
• Pontikes, E.G., 2012, Two Sides of the Same Coin: How Ambiguous Classification Affects Multiple Audiences' Evaluations, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 81-118.
• Royce, M., 2007, Using Human Resource Management Tools to Support Social Enterprise : Emerging Themes from the Sector , Social Enterprise Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 10-19.
• Sahlman, W.A., 1996, Some Thoughts on Business Plans, in: Sahlman, W.A., Steven- son, H., Roberts, M.J., Bhide, A.V. (eds.), The Entrepreneurial Venture , Boston, Harvard Business School Press, pp. 138-176.
• Salamon, L., 1987, Of Market Failure, Voluntary Failure and Third-Party Government - Non-profit Relations in the Modern Welfare State , Journal of Voluntary Action Research, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 29-49.
• Smith, W.K., Lewis, M.W., 2011, Toward a Theory of Paradox: a Dynamic Equili- brium Model of Organizing, Academy of Management Review, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 381-403.
• Smith, S.R., 2010, Hybridization and Non-profit Organizations, Policy and Society, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 219-229.
• Stark, D., 2009, The Sense of Dissonance : Accounts of Worth in Economic Life, Prin- ceton University Press.
• Starnawska, M., 2014, Zachowanie poprzez sieciowanie w przedsiębiorczości społecznej w odpowiedzi na trudne otoczenie instytucjonalne - przypadek 5 spółdzielni socjalnych, Problemy Zarządzania, vol. 12, no. 4 (48), t. 2, pp. 97-116.
• Starnawska, M., 2015, Resourcing in social enterprise - content analysis of 'good practices' profiled in 'Atlas of social economy' in Poland , paper presented at 5th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise, 30 June-3 July 2015, Helsinki, Finland.
• Stevenson, H.H., 1983, A Perspective on Entrepreneurship, Harvard Business School Working Paper, no. 9, Boston, Harvard Business School, pp. 384-131.
• Stevenson, H.H., 1983, A Perspective on Entrepreneurship, Harvard Business School Working Paper, no. 9, Boston: Harvard Business School, pp. 384-131.
• Stone, M.M., Ostrower, F., 2007, Acting in the Public Interest? Another Look at Research on Nonprofit Governance , Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 416-438.
• Teasdale, S., 2010a, Explaining the Multifaceted Nature of Social Enterprise: Impression Management as (social Entrepreneurial Behaviour, Voluntary Sector Review, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 271-292.
• Teasdale, S., 2010b, What's in a name? Making Sense of Social Enterprise Discourses, Public Policy and Administration, vol. 27, pp. 1-22.
• Young, D.R., 2008, A Unified Theory of Social Enterprise, in: Shockley, G.E., Frank, P.M., Frank, R.R. (eds.), Non Market Entrepreneurship, Cheltenham and Northampton MA, Edward Elgar, pp. 175-191.
• Zahra, S.E., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D.O., Shulman, J.M., 2009, A Typology of Social Entrepreneurs: Motives, Search Processes and Ethical Challenges, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 519-532.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.18559/SOEP.2016.5.3