Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2007 | nr 19 | 156--193
Tytuł artykułu

Lake Water Quality Valuation - Benefit Transfer Approach vs. Empirical Evidence

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
The paper reports research in benefit transfer validity between Norway and two New Member States of EU-Poland and the Czech Republic. Based on the original eutrophication contingent valuation study conducted in Norway in 1994, repeated later in Norway (1997) and Germany (2000), two studies were conducted in Poland and the Czech Republic in 2005 in which we ask residents for willingness-to-pay for a hypothetical improvement of water quality in a lake which is strongly euthrophicated and therefore not usable for all recreational activities. The studies were designed in a way that would match the Norwegian original as closely as possible, with regard to site selection, scenario, payment vehicle and even the questionnaire design. The experience gained and the data collected serves to test for possibilities for future BT from Western European countries to new EU Member States as well as between two new member countries. Naive single benefit transfer yields the largest error rates. Transfers adjusted by purchasing power decrease these errors, however, they still remain very large. The error rates are more reduced by transfer benefit function and particularly after adjustments by income elasticities. Following our best transfer, the lowest error remains as high as 30%. Error rates for transferring benefits from Norwegian 1997-study which is just comparable with the Czech and Polish one from even after purchasing power adjustments remain. The paper summarizes the process of collecting data and results, analyzes main differences between the original and two latter studies as well as between the new studies. Finally, value transfer and function transfer are conducted and followed by validity tests. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • Warsaw University, Warsaw Ecological Economics Center
  • Warsaw University, Warsaw Ecological Economics Center
  • Warsaw University, Warsaw Ecological Economics Center
  • Warsaw University, Warsaw Ecological Economics Center
  • Charles University Prague
  • Charles University Prague
  • Charles University Prague
  • Alberini, A. and Krupnick A. (2003), "Valuing the health effects of pollution". [In:] Tietenberg, T. and Folmer, H.,The International of Environmental and Resource Economics 2003/2004. A Survey of Current Issues. Cheltenham, UK. Edward Edgar, p. 233-277.
  • Alberini, A., Šèasný, M., Braun Kohlová (2005), The Value of Statistical Life in the Czech Republic. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economics EAERE-2005, Bremen, 23-26June, 2005. Available at CD-ROM.
  • Alberini, A., Šèasný, M., Braun Kohlová, M., Melichar, J. (2006), "The Value of Statistical Life in the Czech Republic, Evidence from Contingent Valuation Study". [In:] Menne, B., Ebi, K.L. (eds.), Climate Change and Adaptation Strategies for Human Health. Springer, Steinhopff Verlag, Darmstadt, p. 373-393.
  • Bateman I. et al. (2004), Economic valuation with stated preference techniques, amanual, Edward Elgar.
  • Barton, D., and Mourato, S. (2003), "Transferring the Benefits of Avoided Health Effects from Water Pollution Between Portugal and Costa Rica", Environment and Development Economics No 8, p. 351-371
  • Bergland, O., K. Magnussen, S. Navrud (1995), Benefit Transfer, Testing for Accuracy and Reliability. Discussion Paper 95-03. Aas, Agricultural University of Norway, Dept. of Economics and Social Sciences.
  • Blundell, R., Meghir C. (1987), "Bivariate Alternatives to the Tobit Model", Journal of Econometrics No 34, pp. 179-200.
  • Cameron, T.A., D.D. Huppert (1988), "OLS versus ML Estimation of Non-market Resource Values wit Payment Card Interval Data". Journal of Environmental Economics and Management No 17, p. 230-46.
  • Champ, P.A., K.J. Boyle and T.C. Brown (2003), A primer on non-market valuation. The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources. Bateman, I.J. Series Editor. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht/London/Boston.
  • Chestnut, L., B. Ostro, and N. Vichit-Vadakan (1997), "Transferability of Air Pollution Control Health Benefits Estimates from the United States to Developing Countries, Evidence from the Bangkok Study". American Journal of Agricultural Economics No 79(5), p. 1630-1635
  • Deaton A., M. Irish (1984), "Statistical Models for Zero Expenditures in Household Budgets", Journal of Public Economics No 23, pp. 59-80.
  • Desaigues, B. et al. Survey on willingness-to-pay for increasing life expectancy due to reduced air pollution. Final Report of WP6, Research Stream 1b of Integrated Project NEEDS; forthcoming.
  • Downing, M. and Ozuna Jr, T. (1996), "Testing the reliability of the benefit function transfer approach". Journal of Environmental Economics and Management No 30,p. 316-322
  • Freeman, A. Myrick III. (1984), "On the Tactics of Benefit Estimation Under Executive Order 12291", in V. K. Smith, editor, Environmental Policy Under Reagan's Executive Order (Chapel Hill, N.C., University of North Carolina Press).
  • Greene W. (2002), Econometric Analysis, Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
  • Haab T. and K. McConnell (2003),Valuing environmental and natural resources, the econometrics of non-market valuation, Edward Elgar.
  • Hökby, S. and T. Söderqvist (2001), "Elasticities of demand and willingness to pay for environmental services in Sweden", 11th Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Paper.
  • Kirchhoff, S., B. Colby, J. LaFrance (1997), "Evaluating the Performance of Benefit Transfer, an Empirical Equiry", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management No 33, p. 75-93.
  • Kristófersson, D. and S. Navrud (2005), "Validity Tests of Benefit Transfer - Are We Performing the Wrong Tests?". Environmental and Resource Economics No 30, p.279-286
  • Kriström B. and P. Riera (1996), "Is the income elasticity of environmental improvements less than one?". Environmental & Resource Economics No 7, p. 45-55.
  • Kriström B. (1997), "Spike Models in Contingent Valuation", American Journal of Agricultural Economics No 79 (August), p. 1013-1023.
  • Krupnick, A., K. Harrison, E. Nickell, and M. Toman (1996), "Value of Health Benefits from Ambient Air Quality Improvements In Central and Eastern Europe, An Exercise in Benefits Transfer", Environmental and Resource Economics No 7, p. 307-32
  • Loomis, J.B. (1992), "The evolution of a more rigorous approach to benefit transfer, benefit function transfer". Water Resources Research No 28(3), p. 701-705.
  • Loomis, J.B., Roach, B., Ward, F. and Ready, R. (1995), "Testing transferability of recreation demand models across regions, a study of Corps of Engineer reservoirs". Water Resources Research No 31(3), p. 721-730
  • Magnussen K. (1997), "Environmental objectives for the water resources- Evaluationof the benefit of maintaining or improving the environmental quality". (In Norwegian: "Miljømål for vannforekomstene-Nyttevurdering av å opprettholde ellerforbedre miljøkvalitet"). SFT report 97,36. National Pollution Control Authority (Statens Forurensningstilsyn), Oslo, Norway.
  • Mitchell, R.C., R.T. Carson (1989), Using Surveys to value Public Goods. The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington DC, Resources For the Future.
  • Muthke, T., K. Holm-Mueller (2004), "National and International Benefit Transfer Testing with a Rigorous Test Procedure". Environmental & Resource Economics No 29 (2004), p. 323-336.
  • Navrud S. (2004), "Value transfer and environmental policy", [In:], T. Tietemberg and H.Folmer (eds.), The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2004/2005, a survey of current issues. London, Edgar Elgar Publishers.
  • Ready, R., Navrud, S., Day, B., Dubourg, R., Machado, F., Mourato, S., Spanninks, F.,Vázquez Rodriguez, M. X. (2004), "Benefit Transfer in Europe, How Reliable Are Transfers between Countries?". Environmental and Resource Economics Vol. 29, No. 1, p. 67-82.
  • Reiser, B., and M. Shechter (1999), "Incorporating zero values in the economic valuation of environmental program benefits".Environmetrics No 10(1), p. 87-101.
  • Rosenberger, R. and J. Loomis (2001), "Benefit Transfer of Outdoor Recreation Use Values, A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service Strategic Plan (2000 Revision)". RMRS-GTR-72. Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO.
  • Rozan, A. (2004), "Benefit Transfer, A Comparison of WTP for Air Duality between France and Germany". Environmental and Resource Economics Vol. 29, No. 3, 2004, p. 295-306.
  • Tobin, J. (1958), "Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables". Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society Vol. 26, No. 1, January, 1958. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
  • Van den Berg, T.P., G.L. Poe, and J.R. Powell (2001), "Assessing the Accuracy of Benefits Transfers, Evidence from a Multi-Site Contingent Valuation Study of Ground-water Quality", [In:] J.C. Bergstrom, K.J. Boyle, and G.L. Poe, eds.,The Economic Value of Water Quality. Mass, Edward Elgar.
  • ---
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.