The Rules on Political Parties in Romania Under Comparative Scrutiny
This article is based on two premises. First, the requirements for establishing political parties in Romania are the most restrictive in Europe. When a party has succeeded to register and took a nonideological position, the electoral participation slightly increased. If the requirements for registering political parties were relaxed, new parties could emerge while greater participation to the elections is under question. The current legal procedure for registering political parties is contrary to Article 40 of the Constitution (the right to association) and the requirement according to which a political party wishing to participate in parliamentary elections must make a deposit is contrary to Article 37 of the Constitution (the right to be elected). Proving the validity of these premises leads to the necessity of changing the current normative framework in the sense of relaxing the requirements for the registration of political parties. This change may be accomplished by a draft law (which is already registered in the parliament) or by the intervention of the Constitutional Court.(original abstract)
- Alexandru R. (1999). Partidele politice româneşti după 1989 [The Romanian political parties after 1989], Bucureşti: Paideia.
- Bayram M., Kazakhstan: Muslim Board Islamic monopoly, Catholic exemption. Available at <wwrn.org/articles/38567>. [Accesed on 20 February 2015].
- Blondel J. (1968). 'Party Systems and Patterns of Government in Western Democracies'. Canadian Journal of Political Science. No. 2
- Carp R. (1999). 'Reformularea modelului Hotelling - Downs în varianta lui Albert Hirschman' [Reformulating the Hotelling - Downs model from Albert Hirschman perspective]. In: Hirschman, A. O. (1999). Abandon, contestare şi loialitate. Reacţii faţă de declinul firmelor, organizaţiilor şi statelor [Exit, voice and loyalty. Reactions to the decline of firms, organisations and states]. Bucharest: Nemira
- Dorsen N., Rosenfeld M., Sajó A. and Baer S. (2003). Comparative Constitutionalism - Cases and Materials. St. Paul: Thomson West
- Downs A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row
- Hirschman A. O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty. Responses to decline in firms, organisations and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
- Hotelling H. (1929). 'Stability in Competition'. The Economic Journal. XXXIX
- Ionescu A. (2009). Du parti - État a l'État des partis. Changer de régime politique en Roumanie. Bucureşti: Editura Academiei Române.
- Loewenstein K. (1937). 'Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights', American Political Science Review, No. 31
- Nanu D. (2009). Evoluţia sistemului de partide în România după decembrie '89 [The evolution of party system in Romania after December 1989], Sibiu: Alma Mater
- Preda C. and Soare S. (2008). Regimul, partidele şi sistemul politic în România [The regime, the parties and the political system in Romania], Bucureşti: Nemira.
- Sajó A. ed. (2003). Militant Democracy. Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing.
- Sartori G. (1976). Parties and party systems, A framework for analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Soare S. (2004). Les partis politiques roumains après 1989. Bruxelles: Éditions de l'Université Libre de Bruxelles.
- Van Biezen I. (2003). Political parties in new democracies. Party organization in Southern and East - Central Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Vandermotten C., Medina Lockhart P., La géographie électorale de l'Europe centre-orientale, in De Waele J.-M. ed. (2002). Partis politiques et démocraties en Europe Centrale et Orientale, Bruxelles: Éditions de l'Université Libre de Bruxelles
- ECtHR 30 January 1998, Case No. 19392/92, United Communist Party of Turkey and others v. Turkey.
- European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), Opinion no. 190/2002, Code of good practice in electoral matters. Guidelines and explanatory report, CDL-AD (2002) 23 rev.