The Influence of Consumer Recommendations on Advertising Strategies in a Non-Linear Optimal Goodwill Model with Market Segmentation

• Autorzy: Dominika Bogusz , Mariusz Górajski
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

We propose a new dynamical model of product goodwill. It is assumed that the product is sold in many market segments. The segments here are distinct according to the age of the consumers. We take into account the fact that the product goodwill in a segment of new consumers strongly depends on: the level of product goodwill in existing consumer segments, on consumer recommendations, and on advertising efforts which are diverse for different market segments and times. In our optimal control model, the control variables are the company's advertising efforts in order to maximize its profits. The optimal solution of this model is obtained by the use of the maximum principle. Additionally, the sensitivity of this solution to different analytical forms of consumer recommendation functions is briefly analysed.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Enterprise value; Advertising strategy; Profit

PL

Wartość przedsiębiorstwa; Strategia reklamy; Zysk

• Czasopismo: Mathematical Economics
• Rocznik: 2015
• Numer: nr 11 (18)
• Strony: 5--20

Twórcy

autor

Dominika Bogusz

• University of Lodz, Poland

autor

Mariusz Górajski

• University of Lodz, Poland

Bibliografia

• Allenby G., Rossi P. (1999). Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity. Journal of Econometrics. Vol. 89. No. 1-2. Pp. 57-78.
• Bogusz D., Górajski M. (2014). Optimal boundary control problem for a PDE model of goodwill dynamic. arXiv preprint arXiv:14110880.
• Bayus B. (1985). Word of mouth: the indirect effects of marketing efforts. Journal of Advertising Research. Vol. 25. No. 3. Pp. 31-39.
• Brown J., Reingen P. (1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research. Vol. 3. Pp. 350-362.
• Buratto A., Grosset L.,Viscolani B. (2006). Advertising a new product in a segmented market. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 175. No. 2. Pp. 1262-1267.
• Buttle F. (1998). Word of mouth: understanding and managing referral marketing. Journal of strategic marketing. Vol. 6. No. 3. Pp. 241-254.
• Day G.S. (1971). Attitude change, media and word of mouth. Journal of Advertising Research. Vol. 11. No. 6. Pp. 31-40.
• Drolet A., Williams P., Lau-Gesk L. (2007). Age-related differences in responses to affective vs. rational ads for hedonic vs. utilitarian products. Marketing Letters. Vol. 18. No. 4. Pp. 211-221.
• East R., Hammond K., Lomax W., Robinson H. (2005). What is the effect of a recommendation? The Marketing Review. Vol. 5. No. 2. Pp. 145-157.
• Feichtinger G., Hartl R., Sethi S. (1994). Dynamic optimal control models in advertising: Recent development. Management Science. Vol. 40. No. 2. Pp. 195-226.
• Feichtinger G., Tragler G., Veliov V. (2003). Optimality conditions for age-structured control systems. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. Vol. 288. No. 1. Pp. 47-68.
• Grosset L., Viscolani B. (2005). Advertising for the introduction of an age-sensitive product. Optimal Control Applicattions and Methods. Vol. 26. No. 3. Pp. 157-167.
• Gupta P., Harris J. (2010). How e-wom recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 63. No. 9. Pp. 1041-1049.
• Hennig-Thurau T., Gwinner K., Walsh G., Gremler D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing. Vol. 18. No. 1. Pp. 38-52.
• Herr P., Kardes F., Kim J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research. Vol. 14. No. 4. Pp. 454-462.
• Huang J., Leng M., Liang L. (2012). Recent developments in dynamic advertising research. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 220. No. 3. Pp. 591-609.
• Kotler P., Keller K. (2006). Marketing Management. Twelfth Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall. New Jersey.
• Nerlove M., Arrow J. (1962). Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions. Economica. Vol. 29. No. 114. Pp. 129-142.
• Peterson R., Merino M. (2003). Consumer information search behavior and the internet. Psychology and Marketing. Vol. 20. No. 2. Pp. 99-121.
• Rovinelli L., Whissell C. (1998). Emotion and style in 30-second television advertisements targeted at men, women, boys, and girls. Perceptual and Motor Skills. Vol. 86. No. 3. Pp. 1048-1050.
• Sheth J. (1971). Word-of-mouth in low-risk innovations. Journal of Advertising Research. Vol. 11. No. 3. Pp. 15-18.
• Simon J., Arndt J. (1980). The shape of the advertising response function. Journal of Advertising Research. Vol. 20. No. 4. Pp. 11-28.
• Taylor J., Kennedy R., Sharp B. (2009). Is once really enough? Making generalizations about advertising's convex sales response function. Journal of Advertising Research. Vol. 49. No. 2. Pp. 198-200.
• Whissell C., McCall L. (1997). Pleasantness, activation, and sex differences in advertising. Psychological reports. Vol. 81. No. 2. Pp. 355-367.
• Wyner G. (2002). Segmentation architecture. Marketing Management. Vol. 11. No. 2. Pp. 6-7.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15611/me.2015.11.01