Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
1998 | Modelowanie preferencji a ryzyko '98 | 369--381
Tytuł artykułu

Stability of the stochastic dominance in time series analysis

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
While stochastic dominance has been employed, it has been developed and extensively employed in the area of economics, finance and operation research. In this study the first, second and third order stochastic dominance rules are discussed with an emphasis on the development in the area of financial issues. The paper reviews the stochastic dominance and deals with the effectiveness of the various stochastic dominance rules in portfolio selection. Second part of the paper deals with outranking relations based on stochastic dominance without distinction between the prevailing types of dominance. In the suggested approach that a decision-maker's preference between two alternatives determined by his perception of the probabilities. This perception depends on the level of overlapping of the compared distribution and is expressed by degree of preference as measured from three functions connected with the prevailing type of dominance. The degrees of preference are the aggregated to build an overall preference relation between each pair of alternatives. In the finance this problem arise with stock selection when we need to compare return distribution. The main question, in times series analysis, is the question of how valued are our analysis for the future. Empirical study of the stability of stochastic dominance is the last part of this paper. (fragment of text)
  • The Karol Adamiecki University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
  • Université du Québec UQAT
  • Chou S.R., Liao T.L. (1996). The Relative Performance of PER and PSR Filters with Stochastic Dominance: Evidence from the Taiwan Stock Exchange. Applied Financial Economics, 6, 19-27.
  • Langewisch A., Choobineh F. (1996). Stochastic Dominance Tests for Ranking Alternatives under Ambiguity. European Journal of Operational Research, 95,139-154.
  • Levy H. (1992). Stochastic Dominance and Expected Utility: Survey and Analysis Management Science, 38,4, 555-593.
  • Levy H., Kroll Y. (1970). Ordering Dominance with Riskless Assets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 11, 743-773.
  • Levy H., Lerman Z. (1985). Testing P/E Ratio Filters with Stochastic Dominance. Journal of Portfolio Management, 11, 31-40.
  • Levy H., Samat K. (1984). Portfolio and Investment Selection. Theory and Practice. Prentice-Hall Intentional, Inc.
  • Martel J. M., Azondekon S., Zaras K. (1994). Preference Relations in Multicriterion Analysis under Risk. Belgian Journal of Operations Research, Statistics and Computer Science, Vol. 31, No. 3-4, (55-83).
  • Modelling Preferences Using the Stochastic Dominance. Part II. (1997) ed. by T. Trzaskalik. AE, Katowice.
  • Quirk J.P., Saposnik R. (1962). Admissibility and Measurable Utility Functions. Review of Economics Study, Feb. 29, 140-146.
  • Rothschild L. J., Stiglitz J. E. (1970). Increasing risk. A definition. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 225-243.
  • Trzpiot G. (1997). Stochastic Dominance in Optimal Portfolio Selections. In: Proceedings of the Mathematical Methods in Economics, 185-187. Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava.
  • Trzpiot G. (1998). Multivalued Stochastic Dominance in Optimal Portfolio Selection: Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Université Laval, CRAEDO 004, Québec, Canada.
  • Zaraś K. (1989). Dominance stochastique pour deux classes de fonctions d'utilite concaves et convex. RAIRO, Recherche Operationelle, 21, 1.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.