How to Measure Tenatsˊ Satisfaction in Science and Technology Parks? A Case Study of Office Rental Services in Polish STP

• Autorzy: Michał Staszków
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Creativity and the capacity to implement innovative solutions is widely acknowledged as a competitive advantage for businesses, cities or even regions. Theoretically the role of science and technology parks (STP) should be pivotal in establishing such an advantage. One of the main services provided by STPs, which allows them to fulfil their goals, is rental of office spaces. Competition in office rental services grew in the biggest cities in Poland; therefore an important issue becomes the quality of the services provided and the satisfaction of STPs' customers. High quality office space can be certified according to the ISO 9001 standard, to obtain which it is necessary to carry out customer satisfaction surveys. The use of a Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) allows the specification of customers' needs and their satisfaction with services provided or products purchased. The author presents the concept of CSI and shows the practical application of it using the example of office space rental services provided by one of the Polish technology parks (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Innovations; Competitive advantage

PL

Innowacje; Przewaga konkurencyjna

• Czasopismo: Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 4
• Numer: nr 6
• Strony: 115--128

Twórcy

autor

Michał Staszków

• Poznań University of Economics and Business

Bibliografia

• Almeida, A., Santos, C., Silva, M.R. 2009, Bridging Science to Economy: The Role of Science and Technologic Parks in Innovation Strategies in "Follower" Regions, Working Papers, Universidade do Porto.
• Asheim, B., Coenen, L., 2005, Knowledge Bases and Regional Innovation Systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters, Research Policy, vol. 34, iss. 8, pp. 1173-1190.
• AURP, 2013, What is a Research Park?, Association of University Research Parks http://www.aurp.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=120& Itemid=88 [accessed: 16.01.2013].
• Bakouros, L., Mardas, C., Varsakelis, N., 2002, Science Park, A High Tech Fantasy?: An Analysis of the Science Parks of Greece, Technovation, vol. 22, iss. 2, pp. 123-128.
• Castells, P., Hall, P., 1994, Technopoles of the World: The Making of the 21th Century Industrial Complexes, Routledge, London.
• Colombo, M.G., Delmastro, M., 2002, How Effective Are Technology Incubators? Evidence from Italy, Research Policy, vol. 31, pp. 1103-1122.
• EMAR, 2008, Badanie wskaźnika wpływu Działania 1.1 SPO RZL, Rozwój i modernizacja instrumentów i instytucji rynku pracy. Raport końcowy, EMAR Marketing Research, Warszawa.
• Felsenstein, D., 1994, University-related Science Parks - "Seedbeds" or "Enclaves" of Innovation?, Technovation, vol. 14, no. 2.
• Hansson, F., Husted, K., Vestergaard, J. 2005, Second Generation Science Parks: From Structural Holes Jockeys to Social Capital Catalysts of the Knowledge Society, Technovation, vol. 25, iss. 9, pp. 1039-1049.
• Hill, N., Alexander, J., 2003, Pomiar satysfakcji i lojalności klientów, Oficyna Ekonomiczna, Kraków.
• IASP, 2012, Science and Technology Parks throughout the World. IASP General Survey 2012.
• Kotler, P., 2005, Marketing, Rebis, Poznań.
• Lalkaka, R., 2003, Business Incubators in Developing Countries: Characteristics and Performance, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, vol. 3, no. 1/2, pp. 31-55.
• Löfsten, H., Lindelöf, P., 2002, Science Parks and the Growth of New Technology- -Based Firms - Academic-Industry Links, Innovation and Markets, Research Policy, vol. 31, iss. 6, pp. 859-876.
• Massey, D., Quintas, P., Wield, D., 1992, High-tech Fantasies. Science Parks in Society, Science and Space, Routledge, London.
• Matusiak, K.B., Bąkowski, A., 2008, Wybrane aspekty funkcjonowania parków technologicznych w Polsce i na świecie, PARP, Warszawa.
• Mażewska, M., Osiadacz, J., Tórz, A., 2014, Monitorowanie potrzeb i satysfakcji klientów parków i inkubatorów technologicznych. Diagnoza i analiza problemu, PARP, Warszawa.
• Pawłowska, B., Strychalska-Rudzewicz, A., 2005, Badania satysfakcji klienta w systemie zarządzania jakością, Roczniki Naukowe Stowarzyszenia Ekonomistów i Agrobiznesu, t. VII, z. 3.
• Pelle, D., Bober, M., Lis, M., 2008, Parki technologiczne jako instrument polityki wspierania innowacji dyfuzji wiedzy, Instytut Badań Strukturalnych, Warszawa.
• Puślecki, Ł., 2010, Wpływ współpracy technologicznej krajów rozwiniętych gospodarczo na ich konkurencyjność międzynarodową, Wydawnictwo GRADO, Toruń.
• Sagan A., 2003, Skale jako podstawowy instrument pomiaru w badaniach satysfakcji i lojalności, Statsoft Polska.
• Spring, R.A., MacKenzie, B.S., 1996, A Reexamination of the Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction, Journal of Marketing, vol. 60, iss. 3, pp. 15-32.
• Staszków, M., 2013, Use of Customer Satisfaction Index on the Example of Office Rental Services, Intercathedra, no. 29/3, pp. 95-99.
• Sutherland, D., 2005, China's Science Parks: Production Bases or a Tool for Institutional Reform?, Asia Pacific Business Review, vol. 11, iss. 1, pp. 83-104.
• Szymanski, D.M., Henard, D.H., 2001, Customer Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Evidence, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 16-35.
• ISO, 2013, The International Organization for Standarization, http://www.iso.org/ iso/home.html [accessed: 16.06.2013].
• UKSPA, 2013, The United Kingdom Science Park Association, http://www.ukspa. org.uk/our-association/about-us [accessed: 20.02.2013].
• UNESCO, 2013, Science Legislation, http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/science-technology/science-legislation/ [accessed: 17.02.2013].
• Wach, K., 2005, Współpraca małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw z ośrodkami naukowo-badawczymi na przykładzie Krakowskiego Parku Technologicznego, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie, nr 671, pp. 117-133.
• Waśkowski, Z., 2002, Problemy kształtowania lojalności nabywców, Świat Marketingu, luty.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.18559/SOEP.2016.6.7