Online Behavioural Advertising and the Protection of Children's Personal Data on the Internet

• Autorzy: Agata Jaroszek
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper discusses problems emanating from the current and planned legal framework of the European data protection of children that have emerged and have to be addressed, particularly with regard to the social impact that information and communication technologies have on the way children communicate and make choices online. Given that such problems are not only confined to European countries, approaches to regulating children's privacy on the internet from outside the EU are also discussed where relevant. (fragment of text)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Children; Personal data protection; Internet; Law

PL

Dzieci; Ochrona danych osobowych; Internet; Prawo

• Czasopismo: Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 4
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 56--69

Twórcy

autor

Agata Jaroszek

• University of Wrocław, Poland

Bibliografia

• 16 C.F.R. Part 312: Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule: Proposed Rule; Request for Comment on Proposal to Amend Rule to Respond to Changes in Online Technology <https://www.ftc.gov/policy/federal-register-notices/16-cfr-part-312-childrensonline-privacy-protection-rule-proposed>accessed 12 November 2015.
• 16 CFR Part 312 RIN 3084-AB20 Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule.
• Art. 2 (a) of directive 95/46/EC.
• Article 29 of Directive 95/46/EC. It is an independent European advisory body on data protection and privacy.
• Article 29 Working Party Opinion 04/2012 on Cookie Consent Exemption.
• Article 29 Working Party, Opinion 2/2010.
• Article 29 Working Party, Opinion 4/2007 on the concept of personal data, 01248/07/EN, WP 136, Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 2/2009 on the protection of children's personal data (General Guidelines and the special case of schools), WP 160, 11 February 2009, Opinion 2/2010 on online behavioural advertising, Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 15/2011 on the definition of consent, 01197/11/ENWP 187, 13 July 2011.
• Article 30 of Directive 95/46/EC and Article 15 of Directive 2002/58/EC.
• Art. 24 Commentary of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, EU Network of Independent Experts on Fundamental Rights, 209.
• Art. 29 Working Party Opinion 15/2011 on the definition of consent, 18.
• As amended by Directive 2009/136/EC.
• Before the Federal Trade Commission Washington, DC In the Matter of Amazon.com, Inc.EPIC Complaint and Request for Injunction, Investigation and for Other Relief <https://epic.org/privacy/amazon/coppacomplaint.html>accessed 12 November 2015.
• Brief of Amicus Curiae Electronic Privacy Information Center (Epic) in Support of Appellants Case No. 13-16918.
• Bryant J. Alison (ed), The Children's Television Community (Routledge Communication Series 2006) 253.
• Commission, An EU Agenda for the Rights of the Child COM (2011) 60 final.
• Commission proposes a comprehensive reform of data protection rules to increase users' control of their data and to cut costs for businesses <http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-46_en.htm?locale=en> accessed 12 November 2015.
• Davies Barry, Worrall Stephen, Basket analysis: profiling British customers (1998) 100 (2) "British Food Journal" 102 - 109.
• Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) [2002] OJ L 201/37.
• Directive 95/46/EC Art. 7 (a) and 8 para. 2. (a).
• Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [1995] OJ L 281/31.
• <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phorm> accessed 12 November 2015.
• < http://www.youronlinechoices.com/uk/your-ad-choices> accessed 12 November 2015.
• <http://www.google.com/ads/preferences/html/about.html>accessed 12 November 2015.
• <http://www.iab.com/news/selfregulatory-program-for-online-behavioral-advertising/>accessed 12 November 2015.
• Jasmontaite Lina, De Hert Paul, The EU, children under 13 years and parental consent (2015) 5 (1) "International Data Privacy Law" 20-33.
• Kulesza Joanna, International law challenges to location privacy protection (2013) 3 (3) "International Data Privacy Law".
• Kumar Seetha, BBC Online and behavioural targeting <http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2009/05/bbc_online_and_behavioral_targ.html>accessed 12 November 2015.
• McStay Andrew, The Mood of Information: A Critique of Online Behavioural Advertising (Bloomsbury Publishing 2011) 2.
• OECD, The protection of children online: Risks faced by children online and policies to protect them, OECD Digital Economy Papers (2011) 179, OECD Publishing.
• Opinion 16/2011 on'the EASA/IAB Best Practice Recommendation on Online Behavioural Advertising.
• Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on A framework for advertising aimed at young people and children (own-initiative opinion).
• Opinion 2/2010 on online behavioural advertising, para.3, 7.
• Recommendation CM/Rec (2012)4 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the protection of human rights with regard to social networking services <http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/dataprotection/TPD_documents/CM Rec 2012 4_En_Social networking services.pdf>accessed 12 November 2015.
• Riefa Christine, Markou Christiana, Online marketing: advertisers know you are a dog on the Internet! in Savin Andrej, Trzaskowski (eds), Resarch Handbook on EU Internet Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2014) 383-410.
• Stern Joshua, Introduction to Web 2.0 Technologies 1-2, accessed 12 November 2015.
• Šramová Blandína, Marketing and Media Communications Targeted to Children as Consumers (2015) 191 Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 1525.
• The Safer Internet for Children qualitative study <http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/sip/surveys/qualitative/index_en.htm>accessed 12 November 2015.
• The Article 29 Working Party The opinion 2/2010.
• The literal wording of Article 5(3) of the "ePrivacy Directive", the Opinion 2/2010, pt 4.1.
• Turkington Richard C., Allen Anita L., Privacy Law Cases and Materials (American Casebook Series West Group 1999) 325.
• Users offered ad tracking choice <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7289481.stm> accessed 12 November 2015.
• What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software, http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
• Williams Christopher, BT and Phorm: how an online privacy scandal unfolded. The Crown Prosecution Service's decision not to prosecute BT and Phorm over their secret interception of internet traffic closes a chapter of Britain's biggest online privacy scandal <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/8438461/BT-and-Phorm-how-an-onlineprivacy-scandal-unfolded.html> accessed 12 November 2015.