Sprzeczności postrzeganego wsparcia organizacyjnego

• Autorzy: Milena Gojny-Zbierowska

Warianty tytułu

Paradoxes of perceived organizational support

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Nadrzędnym celem artykułu jest identyfikacja sprzeczności w ramach konstruktu postrzega - nego wsparcia organizacyjnego ( perceived organizational suport - POS). Zostały przedstawione wybrane dyskusyjne aspekty POS na podstawie studiów literaturowych i ich analiza, która pozwoliła na zidentyfikowanie kilku sprzeczności. Po pierwsze, definicja postrzeganego wspar - cia organizacyjnego wskazuje na to, że konstrukt ma charakter jednowymiarowy. Analizując narzędzie do badania POS, można rozróżnić kilka niezależnych wymiarów składających się na wynik ogólny. Po drugie, jednym z podstawowych założeń POS jest założenie o personi- fikacji organizacji, jakiego pracownik dokonuje w procesie percepcji wsparcia. Powoduje to, że nie można rozróżnić wsparcia wynikającego z innych źródeł niż sama organizacja. Trzecia sprzeczność dotyczy nie tyle samej teorii, ile kierunków badań nad postrzeganym wsparciem organizacyjnym i wiąże się z nieuwzględnianiem w interpretacji POS czynników indywidu- alnych, takich jak osobowość.

EN

The main aim of the paper is to identify the paradoxes in perceived organizational support (POS) theory. There is employed the critical method of analysis according to Johnson and Duberley who proposed three steps of an examination: insight, critique and transformative redefinitions. The chosen controversial aspects of POS will be analysed and identified para- doxes presented. Firstly, all researchers investigating the concept have been analyzing POS as a homogeneous integrity. SPOS, the only questionnaire, investigates more than one dimen- sion. Secondly, one of the key assumption is saying about personification of organization and agents acting for its behalf. That makes the source of support unclear. The third aspect con- cerns individual conditions in perceiving support from organization as personality.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Strategiczne zarządzanie zasobami ludzkimi; Społeczeństwo

EN

Strategic human resources management; Society

• Czasopismo: Organizacja i Kierowanie
• Rocznik: 2016
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 23--32

Twórcy

autor

Milena Gojny-Zbierowska

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach

Bibliografia

• Aggarwal-Gupta M., Vohra N., Bhatnagar D., Perceived Organizational Support and Orga - nizational Commitment: The Mediational Influence of Psychological Well-Being , "Journal of Business and Management" 2010, Vol. 16, No. 2.
• Arrow K., The Limits of Organization , Norton, New York 1974.
• Barrick M. R., Murray R., Mount M. K., Ning L., The theory of purposeful work behavior. The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics , "Academy of Manage- ment Review" 2013, Vol. 38, No. 1.
• Blau, P. M., Exchange and power in sociallife , Wiley, New York 1964.
• Cho J., Kessler S. R., Employees' distributive justice perceptions and organizational citi- zenship behaviors: a social exchange perspective , "Review of Business Research" 2008, Vol. 8, No. 6., pp. 131-137.
• Eisenberger R., Huntington R., Hutchison S., Sowa D., Perceived organizational support , "Journal of Applied Psychology" 1986, No. 71.
• Festinger L., A theory of cognitive dissonance , Stanford University Press, Stanford CA 1957.
• Gouldner A. W., The Norm of Reciprocity , "American Sociological Review" 1960, Vol. 25.
• Griffeth R. W., Maertz C. P., Campbell N. S., Allen D. G., The effects of perceived organiza- tional support and perceived supervisor support on employee turnover , "Journal of Orga- nizational Behavior" 2007, Vol. 28, No. 8.
• Hogan J., Holland B., Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective , "Journal of Applied Psychology" 2003, No. 88.
• Hutchison S., A path model of perceived organizational support , "Journal of Social Beha- vior and Personality" 1997, No. 12.
• Johnson P., Duberley J., Understanding Management Research An Introduction to Episte - mology , Sage Publications, London 2000.
• Levinson H., Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization , "Admini- strative Science Quarterly" 1965, No. 9.
• Lynch M., Mcconatha D., Hyper-Symbolic Interactionism: Prelude To A Refurbished Theory Of Symbolic Interaction Or Just Old Wine? , "Sociological Viewpoints" 2006.
• Mead G. H., A Behavioristic Account Of The Significant Symbol , "Journal of Philosophy" 1922, No. 19, pp. 157-163.
• Muse L. A., Stamper C. L., Perceived organizational support: Evidence for a mediated association with work performance , "Journal of Managerial Issues" 2007, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 517-535.
• Ragins B. R., Scandura T. A., Burden or blessing? Expected costs and benefits of being a men - tor , "Journal of Organizational Behavior" 1999, No. 20, pp. 493-509.
• Rhoades L., Eisenberger R., Armeli S., Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support , "Journal of Applied Psychology" 2001, No. 86, pp. 825-836.
• Sears G. J., Hackett R. D., The influence of role definition and affect in LMX: A process per - spective on the personality - LMX relationship , "Journal of Occupational and Organiza- tional Psychology" 2011, No. 84, pp. 544-564.
• Sharma D., Borna S., Stearns J. M., An investigation of the effects of corporate ethical values on employee commitment and performance: Examining the moderating role of perceived fairness , "Journal of Business Ethics" 2009, No. 89, pp. 251-260.
• Sronce R., McKinley W., Perceptions of organizational downsizing , "Journal of Leader - ship and Organizational Studies" 2006, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 89-108.
• Whitener E. M., Do "high commitment" human resource practices affect employee commit - ment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling , Journal of Management" 2001, No. 27 (5), pp. 515-535.
• Yoon J., Thye S., Supervisor support in the work place: Legitimacy and positive affectivity , "Journal of Social Psychology" 2000, No. 140, pp. 295-316.