Zabawa czy rutyna? Podział czynności związanych z opieką nad dzieckiem pomiędzy kobietę i mężczyznę w gospodarstwach domowych w Polsce

• Autorzy: Piotr Michoń

Warianty tytułu

Fun or Routine? The Division of Childcare Activities between Woman and Man in the Households in Poland

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Wykorzystywane w ekonomii teorie dostępności czasu i wymiany dobrze tłumaczą podział pracy w gospodarstwie domowym, gdy mamy do czynienia z tradycyjnym modelem rodziny. Współczesne badania obnażają jednak ich zawodność - po pierwsze, gdy model realizowany w rodzinie jest inny niż tradycyjny, po drugie, gdy próbuje się nimi wyjaśniać podział poszczególnych czynności związanych z opieką nad dzieckiem. Ten artykuł ma na celu zbadanie, jak wygląda podział sześciu różnych czynności opiekuńczych (jak ubieranie, zabawa, pomoc przy odrabianiu lekcji) pomiędzy mężczyznę i kobietę w polskich gospodarstwach domowych, zróżnicowanych ze względu na realizowany model ekonomiczny. Badanie wykazało, że udział ojców w opiece nad dzieckiem różni się w zależności od rodzaju czynności opiekuńczej, jest większy w wypadku opieki interaktywnej, a mniejszy w odniesieniu do czynności rutynowych. Nawet gdy mężczyzna nie pracuje zawodowo, kobieta częściej jest głównym wykonawcą czynności opiekuńczych. Uzyskane wyniki pozwalają sądzić, że istotnym wyjaśnieniem zachowań mężczyzn i kobiet jest ich tożsamość płciowa. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

When dealing with the traditional family model, the theories of time, availability, and exchange do explain the division of labour division in a household. However, recent studies expose their limitations: first, when family model is different than the traditional one, and second, when one applies the theories to the study of division of childcare in a household. The paper aims to examine the division of six various care activities (e.g. dressing, playing with a child) between the man and the woman in Polish households, varying due to the family economic model. The study shows that the fathers' share in childcare varies depending on the type of care activities. Men's involvement is greater for interactive care and smaller with regards to routines. Men are most likely to play and do homework with children, and least likely to care for sick children and assist them when dressing. Even if a man does not work, the woman often is the main performer of care activities. The results suggest that an important explanation for the behaviour of men and women is their gender identity. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Społeczeństwo; Opieka nad dzieckiem; Kobieta w rodzinie; Mężczyzna; Kobieta; Płeć; Tożsamość; Podział pracy; Rodzina

EN

Society; Childcare; Women in family; Men; Woman; Gender; Identity; Division of labour; Family

• Czasopismo: Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 4
• Numer: nr 9
• Strony: 55--73

Twórcy

autor

Piotr Michoń

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu

Bibliografia

• Allen, S.M., Hawkins, A.J., 1999, Maternal Gatekeeping: Mothers' Beliefs and Behaviors that Inhibit Greater Father Involvement in Family Work, Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 61, iss. 1, s. 199-212, DOI: 10.2307/353894.
• Baxter, J., 2002, Patterns of Change and Stability in the Gender Division of Household Labour in Australia, 1986-1997, Journal of Sociology, vol. 38, no. 4, s. 399-424, DOI: 10.1177/144078302128756750.
• Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., Haynes, M., 2008, Life Course Transitions and Housework: Marriage, Parenthood, and Time on Housework, Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 70, iss. 2, s. 259-272, DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00479.x.
• Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., Western, M., 2005. Post-familial Families and the Domestic Division of Labour, Journal of Comparative Family Studies, vol. 36, no. 4, s. 583-600.
• Becker, G.S., 1981, A Treatise on the Family, Harvard University Press, Cambridge/MA.
• Berk, S.F., 1985, Th e Gender Factory: Th e Apportionment of Work in American Households, Plenum, New York.
• Bianchi, S.M., Milkie, M.A., 2010, Work and Family Research in the First Decade of the 21st Century, Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 72, iss. 3, s. 705-725, DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00726.x.
• Bianchi, S.M., Milkie, M.M., Sayer, L.C., Robinson, J.P., 2000, Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor, Social Forces vol. 79, iss. 1, s. 191-228, DOI: 10.1093/sf/79.1.191.
• Bianchi, S.M., Sayer, L.C., Milkie, M.M., Robinson, J.P., 2012, Housework: Who Did, Does or Will Do It, and How Much Does It Matter?, Social Forces, vol. 91, iss. 1, s. 55-63, doi/10.1093/sf/sos120.
• Bittman, M., England, P., Sayer, L., Folbre, N. Matheson, G., 2003, When Does Gender Trump Money? Bargaining and Time in Household Work, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 109, no. 1, s. 186-214, DOI: 10.1086/378341.
• Bittman, M., Wajcman, J., 2000, The Rush Hour: The Character of Leisure Time and Gender Equity, Social Forces, vol. 79, iss. 1, s. 165-189.
• Chesters, J., 2011, Gender Convergence in Core Housework Hours: Assessing the Relevance of Earlier Approaches for Explaining Current Trends, Journal of Sociology, vol. 49, no. 1, s. 78-96, DOI: 10.1177/1440783311427482.
• Coltrane, S., 2000, Research on Household Labor: Modeling and Measuring the Social Embeddedness of Routine Family Work, Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 62, iss. 4, s. 12081233, DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01208.x.
• Craig, L., 2006, How Employed Mothers in Australia Find Time for Both Market Work and Childcare, Journal of Family and Economic Issues, vol. 28, iss. 1, s. 69-87, DOI: 10.1007/s10834-006-9047-2.
• Craig, L., Mullan, K., 2011, How Mothers and Fathers Share Childcare: A Cross-National Time-Use Comparison, American Sociological Review, vol. 76, no. 6, s. 834-861, DOI: 10.1177/0003122411427673.
• Craig, L., Mullan, K., Blaxland, M., 2010, Parenthood, Policy and Work-Family Time in Australia 1992-2006, Work, Employment, Society, vol. 24, no. 1, s. 27-45, DOI:/10.1177/0950017009353778 .
• Cunningham, M., 2007, Infl uences of Women's Employment on the Gendered Division of Household Labor over the Life Course: Evidence From a 31-Year Panel Study, Journal of Family Issues, vol. 28, no. 3, s. 422-444, DOI: 10.1177/0192513x06295198.
• Davis, S., Greenstein, T., 2004. Cross-national Variations in the Division of Household Labor, Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 66, iss. 5, s. 1260-1271; DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00091.x.
• Evertsson, M., Nermo, M., 2007, Changing Resources and the Division of Housework, European Sociological Review, vol. 23, no. 4, s. 455-470, DOI: /10.1093/esr/jcm018.
• Fagan, J., Barnett, M., 2003, Th e Relationship between Maternal Gatekeeping, Paternal Competence, Mothers' Attitudes about the Father Role, and Father Involvement, Journal of Family Issues, vol. 24, no. 8, s. 1020-1043, DOI: 10.1177/0192513x03256397.
• Folbre, N., Bittman, M. (eds.), 2004, Family Time. Th e Social Organization of Care, Routledge, London, New York, DOI: 10.4324/9780203411650.
• Gager, C.T., Sanchez, L. A., Demaris, A., 2009, Whose Time Is It?: The Effect of Employment and Work/Family Stress on Children's Housework, Journal of Family Issues, vol. 30, no. 11, s. 1459-1485, DOI: 10.1177/0192513X09336647.
• Gaunt, R., 2008, Maternal Gatekeeping: Antecedents and Consequences, Journal of Family Issues, vol. 29, no. 3, s. 373-395, DOI: 10.1177/0192513X07307851.
• Gaunt, R., Scott, J., 2014, Parents' Involvement in Childcare: Do Parental and Work Identities Matter?, Psychology of Women Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 4, s. 475-489, DOI: 10.1177/0361684314533484.
• Gershuny, J., Robinson, J., 1988, Historical Changes in the Household Division of Labor, Demography, vol. 25, iss. 4, s. 537-552, DOI: 10.2307/2061320.
• GGP, Generations and Gender Programme, 2014, Generations and Gender Contextual Database, Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (distributor).www.ggp-i.org/contextual-database.html [dostęp: 12.08.2015].
• Gracia, P., 2014, Fathers' Child Care Involvement and Children's Age in Spain: A Time Use Study on Differences by Education and Mothers' Employment, European Sociological Review, vol. 30, no. 2, s. 137-150, DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcu037.
• Greenstein, T.N., 1996, Gender Ideology and Perceptions of the Fairness of the Division of Household Labor : Effects on Marital Quality, Social Forces, vol. 74, iss. 3, s. 1029-1042, DOI: 10.1093/sf/74.3.1029.
• Greenstein, T.N., 2000, Economic Dependence, Gender, and the Division of Labor in the Home: A Replication and Extension, Journal of Marriage and the Family, vol. 62, iss. 2, s. 322-335, DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00322.x.
• Guryan, J., Hurst, E., Kearney, M., 2008, Parental Education and Parental Time with Children, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 22, no. 3, s. 23-46, DOI: .10.1257/jep.22.3.23.
• Hersch, J., Stratton, L., 2002, Housework and Wages, Journal of Human Resources, vol. 37, no. 1, s. 217-229, DOI: .10.2307/3069609.
• Hook, J.L., 2006, Care in Context: Men's Unpaid Work in Advanced Industrialized Nations, American Sociological Review 2006 vol. 71, no. 4, s. 639-660, DOI:10.1177/000312240607100406.
• Kan, M.Y., Sullivan, O., Gershuny, J., 2011, Gender Convergence in Domestic Work: Discerning the Effects of Interactional and Institutional Barriers from Large-scale Data, Sociology, vol. 45, no. 2, s. 234-251, DOI: 10.1177/0038038510394014.
• Killewald, A., Gough, M., 2010, Money Isn't Everything: Wives' Earnings and Housework Time, Social Science Research, vol. 39, no. 6, s. 987-1003, DOI: . 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.005.
• McGinnity, F., Russell, H., 2008, Gender Inequalities in Time Use. The Distribution of Caring, Housework and Employment among Women and Men in Ireland, The Equality Authority and The Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin.
• Michoń, P., 2015, Zatrzymana rewolucja? Zmiany w podziale pracy w gospodarstwach domowych. Międzynarodowe badania porównawcze, Polityka Społeczna, nr 2, s. 27-33.
• Milkie, M., Kendig, S.M., Nomaguchi, K.M., Denny, K.E., 2010, Time with Children, Children's Well-Being, and Work-Family Balance among Employed Parents, Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 72, iss. 5, s. 1329-1343, DOI: 10.1111/j.1741- -3737.2010.00768.x.
• Ramey, G., Ramey, V., 2010, Th e Rug Rat Race, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, (Spring), s. 129-176, DOI: 10.1353/eca.2010.0003.
• Schneider, D., 2011, Market Earnings and Household Work: New Tests of Gender Performance Theory, Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 73, iss. 4, s. 845-860. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00851.x.
• Schneider, D., 2012, Gender Deviance and Household Work: The Role of Occupation, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 117, no. 4, s. 1029-1072, DOI: 10.1086/662649.
• Stryker, S., 2008, From Mead to a Structural Symbolic Interactionism and Beyond, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 34, s. 15-31, DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134649.
• Sullivan, O., 2000, The Division of Domestic Labour: Twenty Years of Change?, Sociology, vol. 34, no. 3, s. 437-456, DOI: 10.1177/s0038038500000286.
• Sullivan, O., 2010, Changing Differences by Educational Attainment in Fathers'Domestic Labour and Child Care, Sociology, vol. 44, no. 4, s. 716-733, DOI:10.1177/0038038510369351.
• Sullivan, O., Billari, F.C., Altintas, E., 2014, Fathers' Changing Contributions to Child Care and Domestic Work in Very Low-Fertility Countries: The Effect of Education, Journal of Family Issues, vol. 35, no. 8, s. 1048-1065, DOI: 10.1177/0192513X14522241.
• Treas, J., 2010, Why Study Housework?, w: Treas, J., Drobnić, S. (eds.), Dividing the Domestic. Men, Women and Household Work in Cross-National Perspective, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, s. 3-18, DOI: 10.11126/stanford/9780804763578.001.0001.
• West, C., Zimmerman, D., 1987, Doing Gender, Gender, Society, vol. 1, no. 2, s. 125-151, DOI: 10.1177/0891243287001002002.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.18559/SOEP.2016.9.4