Market Economy Status for China in Anti-Dumping Procedures - What Is Really Matters?

• Autorzy: Joanna Skrzypczyńska

Warianty tytułu

Status gospodarki rynkowej dla Chin w procedurach antydumpingowych - dlaczego jest ważny?

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Przedmiotem artykułu są wybrane aspekty członkostwa Chin w Światowej Organizacji Handlu (WTO). Chiny są członkiem WTO od 11 grudnia 2001 r. W artykule przyjęto tezę, że chińskie członkostwo w WTO nie jest pełne, ponieważ Chinom nie został nadal przyznany status "gospodarki rynkowej" przez największych partnerów handlowych (UE i USA). W związku z tym procedury antydumpingowe przeciwko Chinom są znacznie prostsze niż wobec jakiegokolwiek innego członka WTO.(original abstract)

The paper examines specific aspects of China's membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO). China has been a member of WTO since 11 December 2001. The main thesis of this paper is that the Chinese membership in the WTO is not full because China has still not been granted "Market Economy" status. This is the reason why the anti-dumping procedures against China are much simpler than against any other WTO member. The main goal of this paper is to describe the antidumping procedure in the WTO and present the differences between procedures against countries with Non-Market Economy Status (China example) and with Market Economy Status.(abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Dumping; Market economy

PL

Dumping; Gospodarka rynkowa

• Czasopismo: Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
• Rocznik: 2016
• Numer: nr 447 Asian Economies in the Context of Globalization
• Strony: 46--54

Twórcy

autor

Joanna Skrzypczyńska

• Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Bibliografia

• Caira M., 2010, The EU-China relationship: From cooperation to strategic partnership, [in:] Bindi F. (ed.), The Foreign Policy of the European Union. Assessing Europe's Role in the World, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
• Cottier T., 2015, The common law of international trade and the future of the World Trade Organization, Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 3-20, doi: 10.1093/jiel/jgv005.
• Commission Staff working document on progress by the People's Republic of China towards graduation to Market Economy Status in trade defence investigation, Brussels, 19/09/2008 SEC(2008) 2503 final.
• Folsom R.H., 2014, Principles if International Trade Law including the World Trade Organization, NAFTA and the European Union, West Academic Publishing.
• Gajdos L., Bendini R., 2013, Trade and economic relations with China, Policy Briefing, DG EXPO/B/PolDep/Note/2013_123.
• Guijn L., Bi T., 2015, China's role in the WTO: Opening up as a way to push forward reforms and combat trade protectionism, [in:] Luolin W. (ed.), China's WTO Accession Reassessed, Routledge Studies on the Chinese Economy, London-New York, pp. 439-454.
• Kerckhoven van S., Luyten A., 2014, The tale of a Trojan horse or the quest for market access? China and the World Trade Organization, Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, vol. 57 (special edition), pp. 193-209.
• Luo Y., 2010, Anti-dumping in the WTO, the EU and China. The Rise of Legalization in the Trade Regime and its Consequences, Kluwer Law International.
• Manjiao Ch., 2012, China's participation in WTO dispute settlement over the past decade: Experiences and impacts, Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 29-49, doi:10.1093/jiel/jgs002.
• Messerlin P.A., 2004, China in the WTO: Antidumping and safeguards, [in:] Bhattasali D., Li S., Martin W. (eds.), China and the WTO. Accession, Policy Reform, and Poverty Reduction Strategies, World Bank and Oxford University Press, pp. 29-48.
• O'Connor B., 2011, Market Economy Status for China is not AutomaticCEPR's Policy Portal, http://voxeu.org/article/china-market-economy (10.03.2016).
• O'Connor B., 2016, Much Ado about 'Nothing': 2016, China and Market Economy Status, Global Trade and Customs Journal, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 176-180.
• Puccio L., 2015, Granting of Market Economy Status to China. An analysis of WTO law and of selected WTO members' policy, European Parliamentary Research Service, November 2015/PE571.325.
• Rao W., 2013, China's Market Economy Status under WTO Antidumping Law after 2016, Tsinghua China Law Review, vol. 5:151, pp. 152-158.
• Snyder F., 2010, The EU, the WTO and China. Legal Pluralism and International Regulation, Hart, Oxford-Portland.
• Tietje Ch., Nowrot K., 2011, Myth or reality? China's Market Economy Status under WTO Anti-Dumping Law after 2016, Policy Papers on Transnational Economic Law, no. 34.
• Trommer S.M., 2007, Special market economy: Undermining the principles of the WTO?, Chinese Journal of International Law, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 565-599.
• Vermulst E., Dion Sud J., Evenett S.J., 2016, Normal value in anti-dumping proceedings against China post-2016: Are some animals less equal than others?, Global Trade and Customs Journal, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 212-228.
• Vincentini D., 2016, MEPs braced for fight over granting China 'Market Economy' status, http://www.euractiv.com/section/trade-society/news/meps-braced-for-fight-over-granting-china-market-economy-status/ (10.03.2016).
• http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2009/june/tradoc_143599.pdf, (10.03.2016).
• http://www.eurofer.org/Issues%26Positions/Market%20Economy%20Status%20%20China/Market%20Economy%20Status%20-%20China.itpl (10.03.2016).

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15611/pn.2016.447.04