Board Homophily, Board Diversity and Network Centrality

• Autorzy: Michał Zdziarski , Dominika Czerniawska

Warianty tytułu

Homofilia, zróżnicowanie i centralność rady w sieci

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The relationships of multiple firms linked by interlocking directors are among classic subjects of studies within the social network approach in organizational research. Interlocking directorates enable exchange of information and resources between two or more firms that are linked by a director who participates in their boards. The phenomenon of interlocking directorates is a major area of research in management, sociology and political science, and has been investigated across different countries, cultures and governance systems. We present a study of interlocking directorates linking boards of firms that are listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. The main aim of this paper is to investigate if board diversity and board homophily are related to positions in an interlocking directorates network. We apply methods of social network analysis. (original abstract)

Relacje firm powiązanych przez dyrektorów zasiadających w wielu radach należą do klasycznych obszarów badań nurtu sieciowego w domenie nauk organizacji i zarządzania. Powiązania rad umożliwiają wymianę informacji i zasobów między dwoma lub więcej firmami powiązanymi ze względu na występowanie w ich organach zarządzających i/lub kontrolnych tych samych osób. Fenomen powiązań rad firm jest przedmiotem wielu badań w naukach o zarządzaniu, socjologii i naukach politycznych realizowanych w różnych krajach, kulturach o odmiennych systemach ładu korporacyjnego. Przedstawiamy w artykule badanie powiązań rad firm notowanych na warszawskiej Giełdzie Papierów Wartościowych. Głównym celem prezentowanych badań jest przedstawienie zależności między zróżnicowaniem składu rady, zjawiskiem hemofilii rad a centralnością ich pozycji w sieci relacji międzyorganizacyjnych tworzonych przez powiązania rad. W artykule wykorzystano metody analiz sieci społecznych. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Supervisory board; Enterprise networks; Organizational relationships; Stock market companies; Research results; Network analysis

PL

Rada nadzorcza; Sieci przedsiębiorstw; Relacje organizacyjne; Spółki giełdowe; Wyniki badań; Analiza sieciowa

• Czasopismo: Problemy Zarządzania
• Rocznik: 2016
• Numer: vol. 14, nr 2 (60), t. 2 Methods of Survey Analysis in Management
• Strony: 117--133

Twórcy

autor

Michał Zdziarski

• University of Warsaw

autor

Dominika Czerniawska

• University of Warsaw

Bibliografia

• Allee, V (2003). The future of knowledge: Increasing prosperity through value networks. New York: Routledge.
• Aluchna, M. (2009). Corporate governance a procesy globalizacji. Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania SGH, 94, 97-114.
• Au, K., Peng, M.W. & Wang, D. (2000). Interlocking directorates, firm strategies, and performance in Hong Kong: Towards a research agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 17(1), 29-47, doi: 10.1023/A:1015432819596
• Batagelj, V. & Mrvar, A. (1998). Pajek - Program for Large Network Analysis. Connections, 47-57.
• Bilimoria, D. (2006). The relationship between women corporate directors and women corporate officers. Journal of Managerial Issues, 1S(1), 47-61.
• Borgatti, S.P. & Foster, P. (2003). The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review of Typology. Journal of Management, 29, 991-1013, doi: 10.1016/S0149- 2063_03_00087-4
• Borgatti, S. & Halgin, D. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 11681181, doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0641
• Brown, D., Brown, D. & Anastasopoulos, V. (2002). Women on Boards: Not Just the Right Thing . . . But the "Bright" Thing. Ottawa: The Conference Board of Canada.
• Burt, R. (1992). Structural Holes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
• Burt, R.S. (1979). A structural theory of interlocking corporate directorates. Social Networks, 1(4), 415-435.
• Carroll, W.K., Fennema, M. & Heemskerk, E.M. (2010). Constituting corporate Europe: A study of elite social organization. Antipode, 42(4), 811-843.
• Chu, J.S. & Davis, G.F. (2015). Who Killed the Inner Circle? The Decline of the American Corporate Interlock Network. Ross School of Business. Michigan: University of Michigan.
• Comet, C. & Pizarro, N. (2011). The cohesion of intercorporate networks in France. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 10, 52-61, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.008
• Cronin, B. & Popov, V. (2005). Director Networks and UK Corporate Performance. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change, 4, 1195-1205, doi: MC04- 0126-2004
• Csardi, G. & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695(5), 1-9.
• Davis, G.F. (1993). Who gets ahead in the market for corporate directors: the political economy of multiple board memberships. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 1, 202-206, doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.1993.103158
• Davis, G.F. (1996). The significance of board interlocks for corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 4(3), 154-159.
• Dyer, J. & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
• Elango, B. & Pattnaik, C. (2007). Building capabilities for international operations through networks: a study of Indian firms. Journal of international Business Studies, 38, 541-555.
• Farrell, K.A. & Hersch, PL. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1), 85-106, doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2003.12.001
• Faust, K. (2005). Using Correspondence Analysis for Joint Displays of Affiliation Networks. In: P.J. Carrington, J. Scott & S. Wasserman (Eds), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 117-147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ferris, S.P., Jagannathan, M. & Pritchard, A.C. (2003). Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1087-1111, doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00559
• Freeman, L. (1979). Centrality in social networks. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embed- dedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510, doi: 10.1086/228311
• Hambrick, D. & Mason, P. (1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. Academy of Management Journal, 9(2), 193-206.
• Handcock, M.S., Hunter, D.R., Butts, C.T., Goodreau, S.M. & Morris, M. (2008). stat- net: Software Tools for the Representation, Visualization, Analysis and Simulation of Network Data. Journal of Statistical Software, 24(1), 1548-7660.
• Haynes, K. & Hillman, A. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 1145-1163, doi: 10.1002/smj.859
• Heemskerk, E. (2007). Decline of the corporate community: Network dynamics of the Dutch business elite. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
• Heemskerk, E. (2011). The social field of the European corporate elite: a network analysis of interlocking directorates among Europe's largest corporate boards. Global Networks, 11(4), 440-460.
• Heemskerk, E.M. & Schnyder, G. (2008). Small states, international pressures, and interlocking directorates: the cases of Switzerland and the Netherlands. European Management Review, 5(1), 41-54, doi: 10.1057/emr.2008.3
• Heemskerk, E.M., Fennema, M. & Carroll, W.K. (2016). The global corporate elite after the financial crisis: Evidence from the transnational network of interlocking directorates. Global Networks, 16(1), 68-88, doi: 10.1111/glob.12098
• Hillman, A.J. & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives. The Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383-396, doi: 10.2307/30040728
• Hillman, A.J., Cannella, A.A. & Harris, I.C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28(6), 747-763, doi: 10.1177/014920630202800603
• Hogg, M.A. & Terry, D.I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121-140.
• Johnson, S., Schnatterly, K. & Hill, A. (2013). Board Composition Beyond Independence: Social Capital, Human Capital, and Demographics. Journal of Management, 39(1), 232-262, doi: 10.1177/0149206312463938
• Kamada, T. & Kawai, S. (1989). An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information processing letters, 31(1), 7-15.
• Kogut, B. & Walker, G. (2001). The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks. American Sociological Review, 317-355.
• Koładkiewicz, I. (2014). Czynniki warunkujące skuteczność rad nadzorczych. Problemy Zarządzania, 12(2), 68-87.
• Kono, C., Palmer, D., Friedland, R. & Zafonte, M. (1998). Lost in space: the geography of corporate interlocking directorates. American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 863-911, doi: 10.1086/231292
• Levi, M., Li, K. & Zhang. F. (2014). Director gender and mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 185-200, doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.005
• Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, doi: 10.1017/CB09780511815447
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. & Cook, J. (2001, August). Birds of Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
• Miller, T. & Triana, M. (2009, July). Demographic Diversity in the Boardroom: Mediators of the Board Diversity-Firm Performance Relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 755-786, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00839.x
• Mintz, B.A. & Schwartz, M. (1985). The power structure of American business. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Mizruchi, M. (1996). What do interloks do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assesment of Research on Interlocking Directorates. Annual Sociological Review, 22, 271-298.
• Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the 0rganiza- tional Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266, doi: 10.2307/259373
• Newbert, S. (2009). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 121-146, doi: 10.1002/smj.573
• Nuzzo, R. (2014). Scientific method: statistical errors. Nature, 150, 150-152.
• Pennings, J. (1980). Interlocking Directorates. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Prell, C. & Skorovetz, J. (2008). Looking at social capital through triad structures. Connections, 28(2), 4-16.
• Ratcliff, R. (1980). Banks and corporate lending: an analysis of the impact of the internal structure of the capitalists class on the lending behavior of banks. American Sociological Review, 553-570.
• Sankar, C.P., Asokan, K. & Kumar, K.S. (2015). Exploratory social network analysis of affiliation networks of Indian listed companies. Social Networks, 43, 113-120, doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2015.03.008
• Sankowska, A. & Siudak, D. (2016). The small world phenomenon and assortative mixing in Polish corporate board and director networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 443, 309-315, doi:10.1016/j.physa.2015.09.058
• Scott, J. (1991). Networks of Corporate Power: A Comparative Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 181-203.
• Seidel, M.D. & Westphal, J.D. (2004). Research impact: How seemingly innocuous social cues in a CE0 survey can lead to change in board of director network ties. Strategic Organization, 2(3), 227-270, doi:10.1177/1476127004045252
• Sinani, E., Stafsudd, A., Thomsen, S., Edling, Ch. & Randoy, T. (2008). Corporate governance in Scandinavia: comparing networks and formal institutions. (B.B. Kogut, Ed.) European Management Review, 5(1), 27-41.
• Singh, H. & Harianto, F. (1989). Management-Board Relationships, Takeover Risk, and the Adoption of Golden Parachutes. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 7-24.
• Singh, V. & Vinnicombe, S. (2004). Why so few women directors in top UK boardrooms? Evidence and theoretical explanations. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 479-488.
• Siudak, D. & Sankowska, A. (2015). Miary analizy sieciowej w ocenie strategii interlockingu-powiązania rad dyrektorów. Nauki o Finansach, 1(22), 120-135.
• Sonnenfeld, J. & Kusin, M.W. (2013, April). What CEOs Really Think of Their Boards. Harvard Business Review, 98-108.
• Stark, D. & Vedres, B. (2012). Political Holes in the Economy The Business Network of Partisan Firms in Hungary. American Sociological Review, 77(5), 700-722, doi: 10.1177/0003122412453921
• Useem, M. (1984). The inner circle. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi: 10.1017/CB09780511815478
• Westphal, J.D. & Milton, L.P. (2000). How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 366-398, doi: 10.2307/2667075
• Westphal, J.D. & Stern, I. (2006). The other pathway to the boardroom: Interpersonal influence behavior as a substitute for elite credentials and majority status in obtaining board appointments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(2), 169-204, doi: 10.2189/ asqu.51.2.169
• Westphal, J.D. & Stern, I. (2007). Flattery will get you everywhere (especially if you are a male Caucasian): How ingratiation, boardroom behavior, and demographic minority status affect additional board appointments at US companies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 267-288, doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634434
• Withers, M., Hillman, A. & Cannella, A. (n.d.). A Multidisciplinary Review of the Director Selection Literature. Journal of Management, 3S(1), 243-277, doi: 10.1177/0149206311428671
• Zdziarski, M. (2012). Elita Wewnętrznego Kręgu i Centralne Firmy. Wyniki Badań Relacji Przez Rady Nadzorcze w Polskich Spółkach Giełdowych. Organization and Management, 150(1), 23-39.
• Zdziarski, M. (2012). Relacje w radach nadzorczych spółek publicznych. Współczesne Zarządzanie, 4, 213-223.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7172/1644-9584.60.7