The Analysis of Succession Strategy, Success Determinants in Polish Family Business - Case Study

• Autorzy: Aleksandra Majda

Warianty tytułu

Analiza determinant sukcesu strategii sukcesyjnej w polskich przedsiębiorstwach rodzinnych - studium przypadku

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Pomimo iż około 690 tys. przedsiębiorstw rodzinnych w UE każdego roku powinno być w trakcie przeprowadzania strategii sukcesyjnej, poszczególne przedsiębiorstwo zarządza tą strategią raz na 20-25 lat. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest przedstawinie wyników niemalże 10 lat badań nad tematyką przedsiębiorczości rodzinnej w Polsce oraz porównanie ich z przeprowadzonym studium przypadku w celu ukazania zarówno zbieżności, jak i rozbieżności, które mogą wpłynąć na zidentyfikowanie nowych elementów wchodzących w skład tworzenia planu strategii sukcesyjnej(original abstract)

Despite that each year approximately up to 690 thousand family businesses should be undergo the succession strategy process in the European Union, individual one has to manage succession process infrequently, only every 20-25 years. That is why in the case of individual company this not straightforward process can change to a critical one. According to the scientific analysis additional problematic circumstances can be met by young companies - like those ones operating in Poland. That is why the author of this publication would like to analyze the situation in Polish family businesses in respect to the model of determinants of initial satisfaction with the succession process in family businesses and compare them to the conducted case study. The obtained results of this paper focus on the convergences and divergences between outcomes of almost 10 years of scientific research in Poland and presented case study. It also underlines the new aspects which may accompany family business during planning and implementing the succession strategy(abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Enterprises; Case study

PL

Przedsiębiorstwo; Studium przypadku

• Czasopismo: Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
• Rocznik: 2016
• Numer: nr 450 Polityka ekonomiczna
• Strony: 357--368

Twórcy

autor

Aleksandra Majda

• University of Lodz

Bibliografia

• Bolin J.R., Pieper T.M., Covin J.G., 2015, CEO tenure and entrepreneurial orientation within family and nonfamily firms, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, http://www.readcube.com/articles/10.1111%2Fetap.12150?r3_referer=wol&tracking_action=preview_click&show_checkout=1&purchase_referrer=onlinelibrary.wiley.com&purchase_site_license=LICENSE_ACCEPTED (access 18.03.15).
• Carbera-Suárez K., De Saá-Pérez P., Garcia-Almeida D., 2001, The succession process from a resources and knowledge-based view of the family firm, Family Business Review, vol. 14, no.1, pp. 37-46.
• Casillas J.C, Moreno A.M., 2010, The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and growth: The moderating role of family involvement, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, vol. 22, no. 3-4, pp. 265-291.
• Chirico F., Nordqvist M., 2010, Dynamic capabilities and trans-generational value creation in family firms: The role of organizational culture, International Small Business Journal, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 487-504.
• Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., Pearson A.W, Barnett T., 2012, Family involvement, family influence and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 36, pp. 267-293.
• De Massis A., Chua J.H., Chrisman J.J, 2008, Factors preventing intra-family succession, Family Business Review, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 181-199.
• De Massis A., Kotlar J, 2014, The case study method in family business research: guidelines for qualitative scholarship, Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 5,no. 1, pp. 15-29.
• Eddleston K.A., Kellermmanns F.W., Floyd S.W., Crittenden V.L., Crittenden W.F., 2013, Planning for growth: Life stage differences in family firms, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1177-1202.
• Expert Group Poland, 2008, Overview of family business relevant issue
• Family Business Expert Group- European Commission, 2009, Overview of family Business Relevant Issues: Research, Networks, Policy Measures and Existing Studies - final report.
• Fletcher D., De Massis A., Nordqvist M, 2016, Qualitative research practices and family business scholarship: A review and future research agenda, Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 7, no.1, pp.8-25.
• Gage D., Gromola J., Kopf E., 2004, Gifting or transferring a business or real property to next generation, ACTEC Journal, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 190-202.
• Gilding M., Gregory S., Cosson B., 2015, Motives and outcomes in family business succession planning, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 299-312.
• Instytut Biznesu Rodzinnego, 2013, Kody wartości. Efektywna sukcesja w polskich firmach rodzinnych, http://kodywartosci.pl/ (access 23.03.16).
• Kelly L.M., Athanassiou N., Crittenden W.F., 2000, Founder centrality strategic behavior in the family-owned firms, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 681-706.
• Lambrecht J., Doncels R., 2006, Toward a Business Family Dynasty: A Lifelong, Continuing Process, [in:] Poutziouris P., Smyrnios K and Klein S. (eds), Handbook of Research on Family Business, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd UK, pp. 133-157.
• Le Breton-Miller I., Miller D., Steier L., 2004, Toward an Integrative model of effective FOB succession, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 305-328.
• Marshall J.P., Sorenson R., Brigham K., Wieling E., Reifman A., Wampler R.S., 2006, The paradox for the family firm CEO: Owner age relationship to succession-related processes and plans, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 22, pp. 348-368.
• Meier O., Schier G., 2014, Family firm succession: Lessons from failure in external party takeover, Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 372-383.
• Miller D., Steier L., Le Breton-Miller I., 2003, Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change and failure in family business, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 513-531.
• Miller D., Wright M., Le Breton-Miller I., Scholes L., 2015, Resources and innovation in family businesses: The Janus-face of family socio-emotional preferences, California Management Review, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 20-40.
• Moorehead S., 2011, It's not all glitz and glamour, Family Business Magazine, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 58-69.
• Morris M.H., Williams R.O., Allen J.A., Avila R.A.,1997,Correlation of success in family business transition, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 12, no.5, pp. 385-401.
• PARP, 2009, Firmy rodzinne w polskiej gospodarce - szanse i wyzwania, http://www.seipa.edu.pl/s/p/artykuly/90/908/Firmy_rodzinne_w_polskiej_gospodarce-PARP%202009.pdf (access 23.03.16).
• PARP, 2009a, Firmy rodzinne https://pokl.parp.gov.pl/index/more/36538 (access 23.03.16).
• PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2007/2008, Skuteczne działanie, https://www.pwc.pl/pl/publikacje/badanie-firm-rodzinnych/assets/firmy-rodzinne-2008-20-02.pdf (access 23.03.16).
• PwC, Family Business Institute,2015, Badanie firm rodzinnych 2015, Polska na tle Europy Środkowo--Wschodniej i świata, https://www.pwc.pl/pl/publikacje/badanie-firm-rodzinnych/assets/firmy-rodzinne-2015-24-02.pdf (access 23.03.16).
• Schlepphorst S., Moog P., 2014, Left in a dark: Family successors' requirement profiles in the family business succession process, Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 358-371.
• Sharma P., 1997, Determinants of the satisfaction of the primary stakeholders with the succession process in family firms, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Calgary, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/35148917_Determinants_of_the_satisfaction_of_the_primary_stakeholders_with_succession_process_in_family_firms (access 22.03.16).
• Sharma P., Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., 2003, Succession planning as planned behavior: some empirical results, Family Business Review, vol. 16, pp. 1-15.
• Sharma P., Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., 2003a, Predictors of satisfaction with the succession process in family firms, Journal of Business Venturing, vol.18, pp. 667-687.
• Sharma P., Chrisman J.J., Pablo, A.L., Chua J.H., 2001, Determinants of initial satisfaction with the succession process in family firms: a conceptual model, Entrepreneurship and Practice, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 17-35.
• Sharma P., Rao S., 2000, Successor attributes in Indian and Canadian family firm: A comparative study, Family Business Review, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 313-330.
• Stewart A., 2014, The Anthropology of Family Business: An Imagined Ideal, [in:] Melin L., Nordqvist M., Sharma P. (eds.), SAGE Handbook of Family Business,, Sage, Newbury Park, pp. 66-82.
• Stewart A., Hitt M.A., 2012, Why can't a family business be more non- family business? Models of professionalization in family firms, Family Business Review, vol.25, no. 1, pp. 58-86.
• Vassiliadis S., Siakas K., Vassiliadis A., 2015, Passing the baton to the next generation of the Greek family business, Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 33, pp. 528-534.
• WSB School of Banking, 2014, Succession strategies in Polish family businesses, http://www.wsb.pl/wroclaw/sites/wsb.pl.wroclaw/files/default_images/srodowisko_akademickie/succession_strategies_of_polish_family_enterprises.pdf?destination=http%3A//www.wsb.pl/wroclaw/sites/wsb.pl.wroclaw/files/default_images/srodowisko_akademickie/succession_strategies_of_polish_family_enterprises.pdf (access 23.03.16).

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15611/pn.2016.450.31