Possibilities of Corporate Financial and Non-Financial Performance Measurement

• Autorzy: Aron Szennay
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper examines the relationship between the traditional financial and non-financial performances and the author attempts to suggest a possible new complex measurement method. Complex performance matrix (CPM) is a fast and easy tool in order to measure companies' financial and non-financial performance. CPM has three dimensions: organisation size, economic performance and environmental performance. The author suggest that corporate analyses complemented by the CPM may show a more proper result. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Corporate finance; Performance measurement; Performance appraisal

PL

Finanse korporacji; Pomiar dokonań; Zarządzanie wynikami

• Czasopismo: Zarządzanie Finansami i Rachunkowość / Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie
• Rocznik: 4 (2016)
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 59--69

Twórcy

autor

Aron Szennay

• Budapest Business School; University of Applied Sciences

Bibliografia

• BRAUN R. 2013: A vállalatok politikája - vállalati, társadalmi felelősségvállalás, vállalati közösségek és a vállalati stratégia jövője, Vezetéstudomány 44 (1), pp. 18-28.
• DOĈEKALOVÁ M.P., KOCMANOVÁ A. 2015: Composite indicator for measuring corporate sustainability. Ecological Indicators, pp. 612-623.
• ELKINGTON J. 1994: Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development, California Management Review 36, 2, pp. 90-100.
• FREEMAN R.E., REED D.L. 1983: Stockholders and stakeholders - A New Perspective on Corporate governance, California Management Review 25.3, pp. 88-106.
• FRIEDMAN M. 1970: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, The New York Times Magazine, Sept 13, 1970, pp. 122-124.
• ISAKSSON R., STEIMLE U. 2009: What does GRI-reporting tell us about corporate sustainability?, The TQM Journal 21, 2, pp. 168-181.
• LENTNER C.S., SZEGEDI K., TATAY T. 2015: Társadalmi felelősségvállalás a bankszektorban, Pénzügyi Szemle 1, pp. 1-7.
• MARGOLIS J.D., ELFENBEIN H.A., WALSH J.P. 2009: Does it Pay to Be Good... And Does it Matter? A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance.
• MARTIN R.L. 2002: The Virtue Matrix: Calculating the Return on Corporate Responsibility, Harvard Business Review 80.3, pp. 68-75.
• NG A.C., REZAEE Z. 2015: Business sustainability performance and cost of equity capital, Journal of Corporate Finance 34, pp. 128-149.
• ÖZÇELIK F., BURCU A.Ö., SEVDA G. 2014: Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in Turkey, Atatürk Üniversitesi Ýktisadi ve Ýdari Bilimler Dergisi 28.3.
• PHILLIPS R., FREEMAN R.E., WICKS A.C. 2003: What stakeholder theory is not, Business Ethics Quarterly 13.4, pp. 479-502.
• SIEW R.Y.J. 2015: A review of corporate sustainability reporting tools (SRTs), Journal of Environmental Management 164, pp. 180-195.
• ŠKARE M., GOLJA T. 2012: Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: is there a link?, Ekonomska Istrazivanja 25. 1, pp. 215-242.
• SLAPER T.F., HALL T.J. 2011: The Triple Bottom Line: What Is It and How Does It Work?, Indiana Business Review 86, 1, p. 4.
• TSOUTSOURA M. 2004: Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance, Center for Responsible Business. UC Berkeley: Center for Responsible Business, retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/111799p2.
• VITEZIĆ N., VUKO T., MÖREC B. 2012: Does financial performance have an impact on corporate sustainability and CSR disclosure - a case of croatian companies, Journal of Business Management 5, pp. 40-47.