Commercialization of Green Technologies : an Exploratory Literature Review

• Autorzy: Karlygash Saparovna Mukhtarova , Anna Aleksandrovna Trifilova , Aknur Zhidebekkyzy
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Technology and innovation are viewed as triggers in the move towards greener economy. Commercialisation of green technologies does not only provide the key drivers for economic growth but are also essential for the world to be sustainable. The central idea of this paper is to address the query of what is known about green technological outputs. In particular, we look at the existing body of literature related to commercialization of green technologies, identifying the most active scholars, journals and relevant publications. The paper provides some answers to the questions of top journals with the papers related to commercialization of green technology, a number of articles with the highest number of citations, or the list of countries with the most of studies in green technologies. The paper has both academic and policy-making value . From the academic perspective the study identifies the scholars who have contributed most to the research on commercialisation of green technologies. For policy-makers, this paper is a report on the existing practices and positive experience in responsible leadership. Additionally for practitioners, the study shows which subject areas create profitable growth in compliance with environmental sustainability and good corporate citizenship. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Ecological investments; Eco-innovation; Innovative management; Literature review

PL

Inwestycje ekologiczne; Ekoinnowacje; Zarządzanie innowacyjne; Przegląd literatury

• Czasopismo: Journal of International Studies
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 9
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 75--87

Twórcy

autor

Karlygash Saparovna Mukhtarova

• Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Republic of Kazakhstan

autor

Anna Aleksandrovna Trifilova

• Exeter University, United Kingdom

autor

Aknur Zhidebekkyzy

• Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Republic of Kazakhstan

Bibliografia

• Andersen, M.M. (2008) 'Eco-innovation-towards a taxonomy and a theory'. 25th Celebration DRUID Conference 2008 on Entrepreneurship and Innovation - Organizations, Institutions, Systems and Regions, Copenhagen, Denmark.
• Aslani, A. (2015) 'Strategic variables of commercialization of renewable energy technologies'. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable energy. 7 (2).
• Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Ribeiro-Soriano, D.E., Sánchez García, J.L. (2015) 'Can a magic recipe foster university spin-off creation?', Journal of Business Research, 68 (11), pp. 2272-2278.
• Bernat, T. (2012a). Green jobs in the USA and the EU - conclusions for Poland. Transformations in Business & Economics, 11(2A), 315-332.
• Bernat, T., & Bartkowiak, P. (2012b). Green jobs - a creative destruction case? Actual Problems of Economics (131), 109-116.
• Bigliardi, B., Galati, F., Verbano, C. (2013) 'Evaluating performance of university spin-off companies: Lessons from Italy', Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 8 (2), pp. 178-188.
• Bosman, J.M., Rasch, M., Sieverts, E., Verhoeff, H. (2006) 'Scopus reviewed and compared. The coverage and functionality of the citation database Scopus, including comparisons with Web of Science and Google Scholar'. Utrecht: Utrecht University Library, http://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/18247
• Bolzani, D., Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Sobrero, M. (2014) 'University spin-offs and their impact: Longitudinal evidence from Italy', Economia e Politica Industriale, 41 (4), pp. 237-263.
• Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (2010). WiN - Wirtschaftswissenschaften für Nachhaltigkeit/ economics for sustainability. Available at http://www.fona.de/de/9886
• Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Velde, E., Vohora, A. (2005) 'Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions'. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, pp. 183-216.
• Corsi, C., Prencipe, A. (2016) 'Improving innovation in University Spin-offs. The fostering role of university and region', Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 11 (2), pp. 13-21.
• Czarnitzki, D., Rammer, C., Toole, A.A. (2014) 'University spin-offs and the "performance premium"', Small Business Economics, 43 (2), pp. 309-326.
• Fackler, D., Schnabel, C., Schmucker, A. (2016) 'Spinoffs in Germany: characteristics, survival, and the role of their parents', Small Business Economics, 46 (1), pp. 93-114.
• Falagas, M.E.; Pitsouni, E.I.; Malietzis, G.A., Pappas, G. (2008) 'Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and Weaknesses.' FASEB Journal 22, no.2, pp. 338-42.
• Fernández-Alles, M., Camelo-Ordaz, C., Franco-Leal, N. (2015) 'Key resources and actors for the evolution of academic spin-offs', Journal of Technology Transfer, 40 (6), pp. 976-1002.
• Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Santoni, S., Sobrero, M. (2011) 'Complements or substitutes? the role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs', Research Policy, 40 (8), pp. 1113-1127.
• Goldsmith, R. E., Gordon, F. R. (2003) 'The Measurement of Innovativeness'. Elsevier Science Ltd.
• Harzing, A.-W. and Wal, R.V.D. (2007) 'Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis'. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8, 1, pp. 1-13.
• Jacso, P. (2005). 'As We May Search-Comparison of Major Features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar Citation-based and Citation-enhanced Databases.' Current Science 89, no. 11, pp. 1537-47.
• Joe, T., John, B., Keith, P. (2005) Managing Innovation, 3rd ed. UK: Wiley.
• Jonsson, L., Baraldi, E., Larsson, L.-E. (2015) 'A broadened innovation support for mutual benefits: Academic engagement by universities as part of technology transfer', International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 14 (2), pp. 71-91.
• Kim, D.-J., Kogut, B. (1996) 'Technological Platforms and Diversification', Organization Science.
• Lejpras, A. (2014) 'How innovative are spin-offs at later stages of development? Comparing innovativeness of established research spin-offs and otherwise created firms', Small Business Economics, 43 (2), pp. 327-351.
• Li, J., Burham, F., Lemley, T., Britton, M. (2010) 'Citation Analysis: Comparison of Web of Sciencel, Scopus, SciFinder, and Google Scholar'. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 7, pp. 196-217
• Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., Ensley, M.D. (2005) 'The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications', Research Policy, 34 (7), pp. 981-993.
• Markman, G., Siegel, D., Wright, M. (2008) 'Research and technology commercialization'. Journal of Management Studies, 45, pp. 1401-1423.
• Munari, F., Rasmussen, E., Toschi, L., Villani, E. (2016) 'Determinants of the university technology transfer policy-mix: a cross-national analysis of gap-funding instruments', Journal of Technology Transfer, 41 (6), pp. 1377-1405.
• OECD (2011) Towards green growth: A summary for policy makers. OECD Meeting of the Council at Ministerial Level, Paris.
• O'Shea, R., Chugh, H., Allen, T. (2008) 'Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework'. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, pp. 653-666.
• Phan, P.H., Siegel, D.S. (2006) 'The effectiveness of university technology transfer: lessons learned from qualitative and quantitative research in the US and UK'. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship 2, 66-144.
• Ramaciotti, L., Rizzo, U. (2015) 'The determinants of academic spin-off creation by Italian universities', R and D Management, 45 (5), pp. 501-514.
• Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., Wright, M. (2014) 'The influence of university departments on the evolution of entrepreneurial competencies in spin-off ventures', Research Policy, 43 (1), pp. 92-106.
• Rasmussen, E., Wright, M. (2015) 'How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective', Journal of Technology Transfer, 40 (5), pp. 782-799.
• Rothaermel, F.T., Agung, S., Jiang, L. (2007) 'University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature'. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, pp. 691-791.
• UNEP (2011). Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. A Synthesis for Policy Makers.
• Schiederig, T., Tietze, F., Herstatt, C. (2012) Green innovation in technology and innovation management - an exploratory literature review. R&D Management, 42 (2), pp.180-192.
• Singh, J., Gu, S. (2010) 'Commercialization potential of microalgae for biofuels production', Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
• Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D., Link, A. (2003) 'Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study'. Research Policy, 32, pp. 27-48.
• Slavtchev, V., Goktepe-Hultén, D. (2016) 'Support for public research spin-offs by the parent organizations and the speed of commercialization', Journal of Technology Transfer, 41 (6), pp. 1507-1525.
• Tekawad, A. (2004) 'A literature survey on a managerial perspective on the process of innovation management,' M.S. thesis, Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern California, California.
• Todorov, T.K., Reuter, K.B., Mitzi, D.B. (2010) 'High-efficiency solar cell with earth-abundant liquid-processed absorber', Advanced Materials.
• Thursby, J.G.A., Jensen, R.A., Thursby, M.C.A. (2001) 'Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: a survey of major US universities'. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, pp. 59-72.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14254/2071-8330.2016/9-3/6