An empirical examination of the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for carbon dioxide emissions in Ghana: an ARDL approach

• Autorzy: Daniel Kwabena Twerefou , Frank Adusah-Poku , William Bekoe
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis postulates an inverted U-shaped relationship between different pollutants and economic growth. In Ghana, as in many other developing countries, there exist scanty studies that confirm or otherwise the EKC hypothesis with regards to CO2 emissions as well as the factors that drive CO2 emissions. This work aims to bridge this knowledge gap by addressing these two major questions using data from 1970 to 2010 and the Auto Regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Bounds Testing approach. The results rather suggest a U-shaped relationship between per capita GDP and CO2 emissions per capita indicating the non-existence of the EKC hypothesis for CO2 in Ghana. This implies that further increase in per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) will only be associated with increase in CO2 emissions as the income per capita turning point of about $624 at constant 2000 prices occurred between 1996 and 1997. Furthermore, our results reveal energy consumption and trade openness are positive long run drivers of CO2 emissions. It is therefore recommended that the enhancement of trade liberalization policies should ensure the use of cleaner technologies and products while investment in cleaner energy alternatives could help reduce CO2 emissions. We also recommend the implementation of the Low Carbon Development Strategy which integrates development and climate change mitigation actions(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Pollution emission; Economic growth; Gross domestic product (GDP); Alternative energy sources

PL

Emisja zanieczyszczeń; Wzrost gospodarczy; Produkt krajowy brutto (PKB); Alternatywne źródła energii

• Czasopismo: Environmental & Socio-economic Studies
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 4
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 1--12

Twórcy

autor

Daniel Kwabena Twerefou

• University of Ghana, Ghana

autor

Frank Adusah-Poku

• Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University, Japan

autor

William Bekoe

• University of Ghana, Ghana

Bibliografia

• Abimbola O.M., Bello A.K. 2010. Does the level of economic growth influence environmental quality in Nigeria: A test of Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Pakistan J. Soc. Sci., 7, 4: 325-329.
• Andreoni J., Levinson A. 2001. The simple analytics of the Environmental Kuznets curve. J. Public Economics, 80: 269-286. [Crossref]
• Antle, J. M., Heidebrink, G. 1999. Environment and Development: Theory and International evidence. Environ. Econ. Dev., 43: 603-625.
• Beckerman W. 1992. Economic growth and the environment: Whose growth? Whose environment? World Dev., 20, 4: 481-496. [Crossref]
• DeBruyn S.M., Heintz R.J. 2002. The Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. [In:] Bergh J.C.J.M.V.D. (ed.). Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Edward Elgar Publ., Oxford: 656-677.
• DeBruyn S.M., Opschoor S. 1998. Developments in the throughput-income relationship: theoretical and empirical observations. Ecol. Econ., 20, 3: 255-268.
• De Groot H.L.F. 1999. Structural Change, Economic Growth and the Environmental Kuznets Curve. OCFEB Research Memorandum 9911, Environmental Policy, Economic Reform and Endogenous Technology, Working Paper Series 1: 7-39.
• Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. Ghana's Second National Communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, EPA, Accra, Ghana. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/ghanc2.pdf [Accessed 10th May, 2015].
• Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. Ghana's Third National Communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, EPA, Accra, Ghana.
• Friedl B., Getzner M. 2003. Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy. Ecol. Econ., 45, 1: 133-148.
• Galeotri M., Lanza A. 1999. Richer and cleaner? A study on carbon dioxide emissions in developing countries. Energy Policy, 27, 10: 565-573. [Crossref]
• Grossman G.M., Krueger A.B. 1991. Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. Natl. Bureau Econ. Res. Working Paper No. 3914. http://www.nber.org/papers/w3914.pdf
• Grossman G.M., Krueger A.B. 1995. Economic growth and the Environment. Quarterly J. Econ., 110, 2: 353-377. [Crossref]
• Gujarati, N. D. 2004. Basic Econometrics. Fourth Edition. The McGraw-Hill Companies.
• Halicioglu, F. 2009. An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy, 37, 3: 1156-1164. [Crossref] [Web of Science]
• Holtz-Eakin D., Selden T. 1995. Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. J. Publ. Econ., 57: 85-101.
• Hossain S. 2012. An econometric analysis for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, foreign trade and urbanization of Japan. Low Carbon Econ., 3: 92-105.
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007. The physical science basis. Contribution of Working group 1 to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4_wg1_full_report.pdf [accessed 25th June, 2015].
• Kriström B., Rivera P. 1995. Is the income elasticity of environmental improvement less than one?, Environ. Res. Econ,. 7: 45-55. [Crossref]
• Lieb Ch.M. 2002. The Environmental Kuznets Curve - A survey of the Empirical Evidence and of Possible Causes. Discussion Paper Ser., No. 391, Interdisci. Inst. of Environ. Econ., Univ. of Heidelberg. http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/md/awi/forschung/dp391.pdf.
• Lopez R. 1994. The environment as a factor of production: The effects of economic growth and trade liberalization. J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 27: 163-184. [Crossref]
• Managi S., Hibiki A., Tetsuya T. 2008. Does trade liberalization reduce pollution emissions? Discussion Papers, 08013. Res. Inst. Econ. Trade Industry (REITI). http://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/08e013.pdf
• Mensah J.T. 2014. Carbon emissions, Energy consumption and Output: A Threshold Analysis of the Causal dynamics in Emerging African Economies. Energy Policy, 70: 172-182. [Web of Science] [Crossref]
• McConnell, K.E. 1997. Income and the demand for environmental quality. Environ. Dev. Econ., 2, 4: 383-400. [Crossref]
• Muhammad S., Faridul I., Muhammad S. 2011. Financial Development, Energy Consumption and CO2 emissions: evidence from ARDL approach for Pakistan. MPRA paper No. 30138. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/30138/1/MPRA_paper_30138.pdf
• Nguyen T.A. 1999. Evidences of Environmental Kuznets Curve from CO2 emissions in six-country analysis. Working Paper. Inst. d'Econ. de Polique de l'Energie (IEPE) BP 47, 38040 Grenoble Cedex 09.
• Omisakin A.O. 2009. Economic growth and environmental quality in Nigeria: Does environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis hold? Environ. Res. J., 3, 1: 14-18.
• Omojolaibi A.Y. 2010. Environmental Quality and Economic Growth in some selected West African countries: A panel data assessment of the EKC. J. Sustain. Dev. Africa, 12, 8: 35-48.
• Onafowora O.A. and Owoye, O. 2014. Bounds Testing Approach to analysis of the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis. Energy Econ., 44: 47-62. [Crossref]
• Panayotou T. 1993. Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. Working paper WP238, Tech. Employment Programme, Geneva: Int. Labour Office. http://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/1993/93B09_31_engl.pdf
• Panayotou T. 2000. Economic Growth and the Environment. Working Paper, 56, Environ. Dev. Paper, 4. Center Int. Dev., Harvard Univ.
• Panayotou T., Sachs J., Peterson A. 1999. Developing countries and the control of climate change: A theoretical perspective and policy implications. CAER II Discussion paper, 45.
• Pesaran M.H., Shin Y. 1999. An Autoregressive Distributed-Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis. Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th century. [In:] Strom S. (ed.) The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symp. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge: 371-413.
• Saboori B., Soleymani A. 2011. CO2 emissions, economic growth and energy consumption in Iran: A cointegration approach. Int. J. Environ. Sci., 2, 1: 44-53.
• Schmalensee R., Stoker T.M., Judson R.A. 1998. World carbon dioxide emissions: 1950-2050. http://globalchange.mit.edu/files/document/MITJPSPGC_Rpt5.pdf
• Selden T.M., Song D. 1995. Neoclassical growth, the J curve for abatement and the inverted U curve for pollution. J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 29, 2: 162-168. [Crossref]
• Shafik N., Bandyopadhyay S. 1992. Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Time Series and Cross Country Evidence. World Bank Policy Res. Working Paper, WPS 904.
• Smulders S., Bretschger L. 2000. Explaining Environmental Kuznets Curves: How Pollution induces policy and new technologies. Center Econ. Res., Tilburg, Discussion Paper, 2000-95.
• Stern D.I., Common M.S., Barbier E.B. 1996. Economic Growth and environmental degradation: The Environmental Kuznets Curve and sustainable development. World Dev., 24, 7: 1151-1160. [Crossref]
• Tamazian A., Chousaa J.P., Vadlamannatia K.C. 2009. Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation? Evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy, 37, 1: 246-253. [Web of Science] [Crossref]
• Twerefou D.K., Appiah-Konadu P. 2015. The Impact of Trade Liberalization on the Environment: Evidence from Ghana. Ghana Soc. Sci. J., 12, 1.
• Word Bank. 2012. World Development Indicators Online Database. The World Bank Group. Available On-Line: http://devdata.worldbank.org/dataonline.