The Role of ESG-Based Compensation in Sustaining the Supply Chain

• Autorzy: Katarzyna Klimkiewicz
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The growing importance of supply chain management on a global scale raises questions about its sustainability and measuring of social impact. This need stems from a desire to determine the benefits and risks for the organization resulting from the paradigm of sustainable development. Organizations also are looking for tools, that help them to assess their social and environmental impact. Decisions made in this field depend, however, on people, the scope of their duties, their norms, values and beliefs. This article focuses on the role the remuneration system has for sustaining supply chains. The analysis shows that discrepancies between incentive schemes used by chain members hinder the partnership oriented on sustaining supply chain networks. Recommendations for the practice are discussed. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Supply chain; Supply Chain Management (SCM); Supply chain flexibility; Supply chain security; Investment incentives; Efficiency measurement; Measurement; High-performance computing systems; Social environment of the consumer; Environmental protection measure of health

PL

Łańcuch dostaw; Zarządzanie łańcuchem dostaw; Elastyczność łańcucha dostaw; Bezpieczeństwo łańcucha dostaw; Ulgi inwestycyjne; Pomiar efektywności; Pomiary; Systemy wysokiej wydajności; Społeczne środowisko konsumenta; Zdrowotny wymiar ochrony środowiska

• Czasopismo: Logistyka Odzysku
• Rocznik: 2017
• Numer: nr 2(23)
• Strony: 73--78

Twórcy

autor

Katarzyna Klimkiewicz

• AGH University of Science and Technology Kraków, Poland

Bibliografia

• Armstrong, M. (2010). A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. 10 th Edition. London, Philadelphia: Kogan Page Publishers.
• Azfar, K. R. W., Khan, N., & Gabriel, H. F. (2014). Performance Measurement: A Conceptual Framework for Supply Chain Practices. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 803-812.
• Beck-Krala, E., & Klimkiewicz, K. (2016). Occupational safety and health as an element of a complex compensation system evaluation within an organization. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 22(4), 523-531.
• Carter C. R., D.S. Rogers. (2008) A Framework of Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Moving toward New Theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38 (5).
• CERES, & Sustainalitics. (2014). Gaining Ground: Corporate Progress on the Ceres Roadmap for Sustainability. CSRES, Sustainalitics.
• Chan, F. T. S., Qi, H. J., Chan, H. K., Lau, H. C. W., & Ip, R. W. L. (2003). A conceptual model of performance measurement for supply chains. Management Decision, 41(7), 635-642.
• Commission of the European Communities. (2001, July 18). Green Paper: Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. COM(2001)366. www.csr-in-commerce.eu/data/files/resources/717/com_2001_0366_en.pdf.
• Coombs, J. E., & Gilley, K. M. (2005). Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 827-840.
• Cruz, J. M., & Matsypura, D. (2009). Supply chain networks with corporate social responsibility through integrated environmental decision-making. International Journal of Production Research, 47(3), 621-648.
• Cuthbertson, R. (2010). The Need for Sustainable Supply Chain Management. In Sustainable Supply Chain Management (pp. 3-13). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• Epstein, M., & Wisner, P. (2001). Balanced Scorecard Report: Good Neighbors: Implementing Social and Environmental Strategies with the BSC (No. Article Reprint No. B0105C) (pp. 3-6). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.
• European Commission. (2011, October 25). Communication form the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions. A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. COM (2011) 681. www.eur-lex.europa.eu/Lex-UriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0681:FIN:EN:PDF.
• Feldmann, M., & Müller, S. (2003). An incentive scheme for true information providing in Supply Chains. Omega, 31(2), 63-73.
• Freeman, R. E., Gilbert, D. L., & Gilbert, D. R. (1991). Unternehmensstrategie, Ethik und persönliche Verantwortung. Campus Verlag.
• Gallear, D., Ghobadian, A., & Chen, W. (2012). Corporate responsibility, supply chain partnership and performance: An empirical examination. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 83-91.
• GEMI. (2004). Forging New Links: Enhancing Supply Chain Value Through Environmental Excellence. Global Environmental Management Initiative. http://gemi.org/supplychain/resources/ForgingNewLinks.pdf. Accessed 2 November 2017.
• Hervani, A. A., Helms, M. M., & Sarkis, J. (2005). Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 12(4), 330-353.
• Hutchins, M. J., & Sutherland, J. W. (2008). An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1688-1698.
• Jastrzębska, E. (2016). Natural environment as a silent stakeholder of a socially responsible company. Good business practices in Poland. Logistyka Odzysku, (nr 4(21)), 80-82.
• Klimkiewicz, K., & Beck-Krala, E. (2015). Responsible rewarding systems - the first step to explore the research area. Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics.
• Klimkiewicz, K., & Nowak, J. G. (2016). The sustainable supply chain management as the challenge for global leadership. Logistyka Odzysku, (2(19)), 78-82.
• Leończuk, D. (2016). Categories of Supply Chain Performance Indicators: An Overview of Approaches. Business, Management & Education / Verslas, Vadyba ir Studijos, 14(1), 103-115.
• Magretta, J. (1998). Fast, Global, and Entrepreneurial: Supply Chain Management, Hong Kong Style. Harvard Business Review, 76(9), 102-114.
• Michniewska, K. (2011). Jak logistyka odzysku pomaga zrównoważyć łańcuch dostaw? Logistyka Odzysku, (nr 1(1)), 11-14.
• Michniewska, K. (2015). Sustainable products- utopia or near future? Logistyka Odzysku, (1).
• Narayanan, V. G., & Raman, A. (2004). Aligning incentives in supply chains. Harvard Business Review, 82(11), 94-102, 149.
• Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80-116.
• Onkila, T. (2015). Pride or Embarrassment? Employees' Emotions and Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(4), 222-236.
• Patorska, J., & Karbowska, D. (2016). Rozszerzona odpowiedzialność producenta a pakiet Komisji Europejskiej dotyczący gospodarki o obiegu zamkniętym. Logistyka Odzysku, (2(19)), 38-44.
• Rudnicka, A. (2011). Rozwój zrównoważony w łańcuchach dostaw. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Filia Oeconomica, 261, 397-405.
• Simatupang, T. M., Sridharan, R., & Wright, A. (2000). Information and Incentives in a Supply Chain. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual New Zealand Engineering and Technology Postgraduate Conference (pp. 269-274). Presented at the Annual New Zealand Engineering and Technology Postgraduate Conference, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
• Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (1999). Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts, Strategies, and Cases w/CD-ROM Package. Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.