Doskonalenie organizacyjne polskich uczelni

• Autorzy: Łukasz Sułkowski

Warianty tytułu

Organizational Development of Polish Universities

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Celem artykułu jest przegląd potencjalnych obszarów doskonalenia organizacyjnego uczelni wyższych w Polsce. Jest to wstępna prezentacja założeń projektu Doskonalenie organizacyjne uczelni przyszłości (konkurs "Dialog" MNiSW) realizowanego pod kierunkiem autora tego artykułu. (fragment tekstu)

EN

The aim of this article is to present the domains of management of Polish universities that should be developed. It covers the preliminary assumptions for a project dedicated to university development that the author is working on currently. Universities must become responsible for self-development, all - especially management - changes need a preparation from universities and the whole system of education but the results would mean science and education management systems. The description of six main management areas is based on research form the area of management of the universities. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Zarządzanie szkolnictwem; Szkolnictwo wyższe; Doskonalenie organizacji

EN

Education management; Higher education; Organisation improving

• Czasopismo: Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie
• Rocznik: 2017
• Numer: t. 18, z. 2, cz. 2 Zarządzanie humanistyczne i publiczne
• Strony: 9--19

Twórcy

autor

Łukasz Sułkowski

• Uniwersytet Jagielloński; Społeczna Akademia Nauk

Bibliografia

• Alessandri S.W., Yang S.U., Kinsey D.F. (2006), An integrative Approach to University Visual Identity and Reputation, "Corporate Reputation Review", 9(4).
• Altbach P. (2015), The Deteriorating Guru: The Crisis of the Professoriate, "International Higher Education", t. 36.
• Alvesson M. (2013), Introduction, Zero-sum Games, Grandiosity, and Illusion Tricks [w:] The Triumph of Emptines. Consumption, Higher Education, and Work Organization, Oxford UP, Oxford.
• Balderston F.E. (1995), Managing Today's University: Strategies for Viability, Change, and Excellence, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
• Benneworth P., Osborne M. (2015), Understanding Universities and Entrepreneurship Education: Towards a Comprehensive Future Research Agenda, CHEPS, University of Twente.
• Brooks R. (2005), Measuring University Quality, "The Review of Higher Education", 29(1).
• Damrosch D. (1995), We Scholars: Changing the Culture of the University, Harvard UP, 79 Garden St., Cambridge, MA.
• Dill D.D., Soo M. (2005), Academic Quality, League Tables, and Public Policy: a Cross-National Analysis of University Ranking Systems, "Higher education", 49(4).
• Dubnick M. (2012), Accountability as Cultural Keyword, University of New Hampshire, Prepared for a presentation at a seminar of the Research Colloquium 2 on Good Governance, Netherlands Institute of Government, VU University, Amsterdam, May 9.
• Haigh M. (2014), From Internationalisation to Education for Global Citizenship: a Multi-Layered History, "Higher Education Quarterly, 68(1).
• Kaufman B.E. (1999), Evolution and Current Status of University HR Programs, "Human Resource Management", 38(2).
• Keller G. (1983), Academic strategy: The management revolution in American higher education, JHU Press.
• Llonch J., Casablancas-Segura C., Alarcón-del-Amo M.C. (2016), Stakeholder Orientation in Public Universities: a Conceptual Discussion and a Scale Development, "Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC", 20(1).
• McCormack J., Propper C., Smith S. (2014), Herding Cats? Management and University Performance, "Economic Journal", 124(578).
• Neumann Y., Finaly-Neumann E. (1990), Faculty attitudes toward institutional competitive strategies in US research universities, "Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education", 15.
• Ressler J., Abratt R. (2009), Assessing the Impact of University Reputation on Stakeholder Intentions, "Journal of General Management", 35(1).
• Sallis E. (2014), Total quality management in education, Routledge.
• Sandu E-A. i in. (2014), Considerations on Implementation of a Social Accountability Management System Model in Higher Education, "Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences", No. 142.
• Shattock M., Temple P. (2006), Entrepreneurialism and the Knowledge Society: Some Conclusions from Cross National Studies, a paper presented at the EAIR Forum, Rome.
• Sporn B. (2006), Governance and Administration: Organizational and Structural Trends [w:] J.J.F. Forest, Ph. G. Altbach (red.), International Handbook of Higher Education, Springer.
• Sułkowski Ł. (2016), Kultura akademicka - koniec utopii?, PWN, Warszawa.
• The 2015 Inside Higher Education Survey of Community College Presidents (2015), a study by Gallup and Inside Higher Ed, S. Jaschik, D. Lederman (red.), [online], https://www.insidehighered.com/surveys, dostęp: 13 stycznia 2016.
• Tomkins C., Green R. (1988), An Experiment in the Use of Data Envelopment Analysis for Evaluating The Efficiency of Uk University Departments of Accounting, "Financial Accountability & Management", 4.2.
• Usher A., Savino M. (2007), A Global Survey of University Ranking and League Tables, "Higher Education in Europe", 32(1).
• Wiedman D. (1990), University Accreditation: Academic Subcultural and Organizational Responses to Directed Change, "Crosscultural Management and Organizational Culture", Williamsburg, VA: Studies in Third World Societies.
• Zhang J., Zhang C., Zhang K., Mi Y., Guo C., Guo J. (2004), A University Human Resource Management System Based on Improved Mvc Model, "Computer Engineering", 8.