PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | t. 18, z. 2, cz. 2 Zarządzanie humanistyczne i publiczne | 59--70
Tytuł artykułu

Strategic Thinking at Academic Organisational Units Based on the Example of Student Union Faculty Boards at a Polish Technical University

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The aim of the paper is to identify and analyse strategic thinking patterns at academic organisational units such as student union faculty boards. The precursor of strategic thinking is H. Mintzberg [1987], the creator of the 5P concept. This approach assumes that strategy can be defined in five ways, i.e.: plan, ploy, pattern, position and perspective. It is the strategy seen as a pattern that gives rise to strategic thinking and to unplanned, flexible adjustment, determined by the position of the enterprise. The subject of research presented in this paper are student union faculty boards operating at a technical university (SUFB). The units are not considered organisations in the full meaning of the term, as they do not keep separate books and records. In other aspects, they share some characteristics with non-profit organisations. Problems faced by such entities include high member rotation, limited budget, subordination to formal requirements, bureaucracy, lack of universal action plans, low member involvement, changing organisational cultures. In addition, non- profit organisations and academic organisational units often focus on principles different than those associated with the classical approach to strategic planning, for instance, instead of fighting for competitive advantage - they focus on serving the community. (original abstract)
Twórcy
  • Wrocław University of Science and Technology
  • Wrocław University of Science and Technology
Bibliografia
  • Bonn I. (2001), Developing strategic thinking as a core competency, "Management Decision", vol. 39.
  • Bonn I. (2005), Improving strategic thinking: A multilevel approach, "Leadership & Organizational Development Journal", vol. 26.
  • Dunbar K., Fugelsang J. (2005), Scientific thinking and reasoning [in:] K. J. Holyoak, R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning, Cambridge UP, Cambridge.
  • Gallimore K. (2010), Developing a tentative framework for strategic thinking [online], https://core.ac.uk/download/files/35/275674.pdf, access: 6.07.2016.
  • Garratt B. (1995), Helicopters and rotting fish: developing strategic thinking and new roles for direction givers, "Developing Strategic Thought - Rediscovering the Art of Direction Giving", McGraw-Hill, London.
  • Glaser E.M. (1941), An experiment in the development of critical thinking, Columbia University Teachers College, New York.
  • Graetz F. (2002), Strategic thinking versus strategic planning: towards understanding the complementarities, "Management Decision", vol. 40, no. 5/6.
  • Heracleous L. (1998), Strategic Thinking or Strategic Planning?, "Strategy At The Leading Edge New Research & Conference Reports", vol. 31, No. 3.
  • Kalali N., Momeni M., Heydari E. (2015), Key Elements of Thinking Strategically, "International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics", 2(8) [online], http://www.ijmae.com/?mod=journalman&act=16, access: 6.07.2016.
  • Kaleta A. (2013), Realizacja strategii, PWE, Warszawa.
  • Liedtka J. (1998), Strategic Thinking; Can It Be Taught?, "Long Range Planning", vol. 31.
  • Mintzberg H. (1987), The strategy concept I: five Ps for strategy, "California Management Review", vol. 30.
  • Mintzberg H. (1994), The fall and rise of strategic planning, "Harvard Business Review", vol. 72.
  • Obłój K. (2007), Strategia organizacji, PWE, Warszawa.
  • Penc J. (2011), Zachowania organizacyjne w przedsiębiorstwie: kreowanie twórczego nastawienia i aspiracji, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa.
  • Porter M.E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniquesfor Analyzing Industries and Competitors, The Free Press, New York.
  • Radomska J. (2013), Myślenie strategiczne - modny trend czy skuteczna alternatywa planowania strategicznego?, "Management and Business Administration", Central Europe, vol. 21, no. 1(120).
  • Regulamin Samorządu Studenckiego Politechniki Wrocławskiej z dnia 18 lutego 2016 r. [online], http://samorzad.pwr.wroc.pl/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Regulamin_Samorzadu_Studenckiego_2016_02.pdf, access: 1.10.2016
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171473036

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.