Znaczenie preferencji siedliskowych zwierząt dla zróżnicowania genetycznego populacji

• Autorzy: Robert W. Mysłajek

Warianty tytułu

The Significance of Animal Habitat Preferences to the Genetic Diversification of the Population

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Struktura genetyczna populacji jest kształtowana przez wiele czynników, wśród których ważne miejsce zajmują preferencje siedliskowe. Jedna z koncepcji zakłada, że zwierzęta osiedlają się najczęściej w siedliskach, których cechy są zbliżone do tych, w jakich same przyszły na świat. Poznanie mechanizmów rządzących preferencjami siedliskowymi organizmów ma duże znaczenie dla planowania działań na rzecz ochrony gatunków. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

Genetic structure of the population is affected by numerous factors, among which habitat preferences seems to be one of the most important. Natal habitat preference induction hypothesis assumed that animals settle mostly in habitats, whose characteristics are similar to those in which they were born. Understanding the mechanisms governing the habitat preferences of organisms is important for the planning of measures to protect the species. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Środowisko przyrodnicze; Ochrona fauny

EN

Natural environment; Protection of fauna

• Czasopismo: Aura
• Rocznik: 2016
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 7--9

Twórcy

autor

Robert W. Mysłajek

• Uniwersytet Warszawski

Bibliografia

• [1] Bohonak A.J. 1999. Dispersal, gene flow, and population structure. Q. Rev. Biol. 74: 21-45.
• [2] Cox C., Moore P. 2010. Biogeography: an ecological and evolutionary approach. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
• [3] Fretwell S.D. 1972. Populations in a seasonal environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
• [4] Morris D.W. 2003. Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection. Oecologia 136: 1-13.
• [5] Citta J.J., Lindberg M.S. 2007. Nest-site selection of passerines: effect of geographic scale and public and personal information. Ecology 88: 95-104.
• [6] Piper W.H. 2011. Making habitat selection more 'familiar': a review. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65: 1329-1351.
• [7] Danchin E., Giraldeau L.A., Valone T.J., Wagner R.H. 2004. Public information: from noisy neighbours to cultural evolution. Science 305: 487-491.
• [8] Bolnick D.I., Svanback R., Fordyce J.A., Yang L.H., Davis J.M., Hulsey C.D., Forister M.L. 2003. The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialisation. Am. Nat. 160: 1-28.
• [9] Davis J.M., Stamps J.A. 2004. The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 411-416.
• [10] Stamps J.A., Davis J.M. 2006. Adaptive effects of natal experience on habitat selection by dispersers. Anim. Behav. 72: 1279-1289.
• [11] Haughland D.L., Larsen K.W. 2004. Exploration correlates with settlement: red squirrel dispersal in contrasting habitats. J. Anim. Ecol. 73: 1024-1034.
• [12] Selonen V., Hanski I.K., Desrochers A. 2007. Natal habitat-biased dispersal in the Siberian flying squirrel. Proc. R. Soc. B 274: 2063-2068.
• [13] Mabry K.E., Stamps J.A. 2007. Dispersing brush mice prefer habitat like home. Proc. R. Soc. B 275: 543-548.
• [14] Nielsen S.E., Shafer A.B.A., Boyce M.S., Stenhouse G.B. 2013. Does learning or instinct shape habitat selection? PLoS ONE 8(1): e53721.
• [15] Sacks B.N., Mitchell B.R., Williams C.L., Ernest H.B. 2005. Coyote movements and social structure along a cryptic population genetic subdivision. Mol. Ecol. 14: 1241-1249.
• [16] Pilot M., Jędrzejewski W., Branicki W., Sidorovich V.E., Jędrzejewska B., Stachura K., Funk S.M. 2006. Ecological factors influence population genetic structure of European grey wolves. Mol. Ecol. 15: 4533-4553.
• [17] Carmichael L.E., Kriza J., Nagy J.A., Fuglei E., Dumond M., Johnson D., Veitch A., Berteaux D., Strobeck C. 2007. Historical and ecological determinants of genetic structure in arctic canids. Mol. Ecol. 16: 3466-3483.
• [18] Musiani M., Leonard J.A., Cluff H.D., Gates C.C., Mariani S., Paquet P.C., Vilá C., Wayne R.K. 2007. Differentiation of tundra/taiga and boreal coniferous forest wolves: genetics, coat colour and association with migratory caribou. Mol. Ecol. 16: 4149-4170.
• [19] Mech L.D., Boitani L. (red.). 2003. Wolves. Behavior, ecology, and conservation. Chicago University Press, Chicago-London.
• [20] Jędrzejewski W., Niedziałkowska M., Nowak S., Jędrzejewska B. 2004. Habitat variables associated with wolf (Canis lupus) distribution and abundance in northern Poland. Divers. Distrib. 10: 225-233.
• [21] Jędrzejewski W., Niedziałkowska M., Mysłajek R.W., Nowak S., Jędrzejewska B. 2005. Habitat selection by wolves Canis lupus in the uplands and mountains of southern Poland. Acta Theriol. 50: 417-428.
• [22] Theuerkauf J., Rouys S., Jędrzejewski W. 2003. Selection of den, rendezvous, and resting sites by wolves in the Białowieża Forest, Poland. Can. J. Zool. 81: 163-167.
• [23] Schmidt K., Jędrzejewski W., Theuerkauf J., Kowalczyk R., Okarma H., Jędrzejewska B. 2008. Reproductive behaviour of wild-living wolves Białowieża Primeval Forest (Poland). J. Ethol. 26: 69-78.
• [24] Mysłajek R.W., Nowak S. 2015. Not an easy road to success: the history of exploitation and restoration of the wolf population in Poland after World War Two. W: Masius M., Sprenger J. (red.). Fairytaile in question: Historical interactions between humans and wolves. White Horse Press, Cambridge: 247-258.
• [25] Czarnomska S.D., Jędrzejewska B., Borowik T., Niedziałkowska М., Stronen A.V., Nowak S., Mysłajek R.W., Okarma H., Konopiński M., Pilot M., Śmietana W., Caniglia R., Fabbri E., Randi E., Pertoldi C., Jędrzejewski W. 2013. Concordant mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA structuring between Polish lowland and Carpathian Mountain wolves. Conserv. Genet 14: 573-588.
• [26] Jędrzejewski W., Niedziałkowska M., Hayward М.W., Goszczyński J., Jędrzejewska B., Borowik T., Bartoń K.A., Nowak S., Harmuszkiewicz J., Juszczyk A., Kałamarz T., Kloch A., Koniuch J., Kotiuk K., Mysłajek R.W., Nędzyńska M., Olczyk A., Teleon M., Wojtulewicz M. 2012. Prey choice and diet of wolves related to ungulate communities and wolf subpopulations in Poland. J. Mammal. 93: 1480-1492.
• [27] Pilot M., Jędrzejewski W., Sidorovich V.E., Meier-Augenstein W., Hoelzel A.R. 2012. Dietary differentiation and the evolution of population genetic structure in a highly mobile carnivore. PLoS ONE 7(6): e39341.
• [28] Stronen A.V., Jędrzejewska B., Pertoldi C., Demontis D., Randi E., Niedziałkowska M., Pilot M., Sidorovich V.E., Dykyy I., Kusak J., Tsingarska E., Kojola I., Karamanlidis A.A., Ornicans A., Lobkov V.A., Dumenko V., Czarnomska S.D. 2013. North-south differentiation and a region of high diversity in European wolves (Canis lupus). PLoS ONE 8(10): e76454.
• [29] Łomnicki A. 1980. Regulation of population density due to individual differences and patchy environment. Oikos 35: 185-193.
• [30] Łomnicki A. 1988. Population ecology of individuals. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
• [31] Allendorf F.W., Luikart G., Aitken S.N. 2013. Conservation and the genetics of population. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
• [32] Hanski I., Mononen T., Ovaskainen O. 2011. Eco-evolutionary metapopulation dynamic and the spatial scale of adaptation. Am. Nat. 177: 29-43.
• [33] Sacks B.N., Bannasch D.L., Chomel B.B., Ernest H.B. 2008. Coyotes demonstrate how habitat specialization by individuals of a generalist species can diversify populations in a heterogeneous ecoregion. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25: 1384-1394.
• [34] Beltman J.B., Metz J.A.J. 2005. Speciation: more likely through a genetic or through a learned habitat preference? Proc. R. Soc. B 272: 1455-1463.
• [35] Kadye W.T., Booth A.J. 2013. Movement patterns and habitat selection of invasive African sharptooth catfish. J. Zool. 289: 41-51.
• [36] Ripple W.J., Estes J.A., Beschta R.L., Wilmers C.C., Ritchie E.G., Hebblewhite M., Berger J., Elmhagen B., Letnic M., Nelson M.P., Schmitz O.J., Smith D.W., Wallach A.D., Wirsing A.J. 2014. Status and ecological effects of the World's largest carnivores. Science 343: 1241484.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15199/2.2016.4.2