PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | t. 18, z. 2, cz. 2 Zarządzanie humanistyczne i publiczne | 279--291
Tytuł artykułu

Aspiring Entrepreneurs Need an Optimum Opportunity-Finding Process

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
How entrepreneurs identify opportunities, formulate business ideas, and evaluate them are among the most important skills of successful entrepreneurs, but knowledge of them remains limited, and thus existing guidelines for practitioners are not sufficient. This is partly because most entrepreneurs do not approach the process optimally or it is difficult to determine the correct approach by simply observing entrepreneurs; researchers cannot observe venture ideas before they are intuited and articulated. Extant research recognizes many factors (e.g. knowledge, social networks, financial resources etc.) that influence opportunity-finding, but most aspiring entrepreneurs lack those factors. The question should not be about how entrepreneurs approach opportunity-finding, but about the optimum opportunity-finding process, and how factors that influence opportunity-finding develop. We introduce opportunity design as a construct for understanding and practicing opportunity-finding. Systems thinking and design theory principles demonstrate a need for the construct. (original abstract)
Twórcy
  • California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Bibliografia
  • Alvarez S., Barney J. (2007), Discovery and Creation: Alternative Theories of Entrepreneurial Action, "Strategic entrepreneurial Journal", 1, 11-26.
  • Ardichvili A., Cardozo R., Ray S. (2003), A Theory of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Identification and Development, "Journal of Business Venturing" 18, 105-123.
  • Bahrami A., Dagli C. (1993), Models of Design Process [in:] H. Parsaei, G. Sullivan, Concurrent Engineering: Contemporary Issues and Modern Design Tools, Springer, London.
  • Baker T., Nelson R. (2005), Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction Through Entrepreneurial Bricolage, "Administrative Science Quarterly", 50, 329-366.
  • Baron R., Ensley M. (2006), Opportunity Recognition as Detection of Meaningful Patterns: Evidence from Comparisons of Novice and Experienced Entrepreneurs, "Management Science", 52(9), 1331-1344.
  • Blessing L. (1994), A Process-Based Approach to Computer-Supported Engineering Design, Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
  • Brown T. (2008), Design Thinking, "Harvard Business Review", 1-10.
  • Companys Y., McMullen J. (2007), Strategic Entrepreneurs at Work: The Nature, Discovery, and Exploitation of Entrepreneurial Opportunities, "Small Business Economics", 28, 301-322.
  • Dimov D. (2004), The Individuality of Opportunity Identification: a Critical Review and Extension [in:] J. Butler, Research in Entrepreneurship and Management, Vol. 4, Information Age Publishing, Greenwich.
  • Dimov D. (2010), Grappling With the Unbearable Elusiveness of Entrepreneurial Opportunity, "Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice", 57-81.
  • Fiet J. (2007), A Prescriptive Analysis of Search and Discovery, "Journal of Management Studies", 44(4), 592-611.
  • Fiet O. (2002), The Systematic Search for Entrepreneurial Discoveries, Quorum Books, Westport.
  • Gartner B.W. (1985), A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation, "Academy of Management Review", 10(4), 696-706.
  • Gartner B.W. (2013), Creating a community of difference in entrepreneurship scholarship, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 25 (1-2), 5-15.
  • Hayek F. (1945), The Use of Knowledge in Society, "American Economic Review", 519-530.
  • Hills G., Lumpkin G., Singh R. (1997), Opportunity Recognition: Perceptions and Behaviors of Entrepreneurs, "Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research", 203-218.
  • Kay C. (1986), The identification of Catalyst Preceding Decision Making as Described by Innovators and Entrepreneurs, University of San Francisco, San Francisco.
  • Kirzner M. (1973), Competition and Entrepreneurship, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Krueger N., Brazeal D. (1994), Entrepreneurial Potential and Potential Entrepreneurs, "Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice", 19, 91-104.
  • Livingston J. (2008), Founders At Work: Stories of Startups' Early Days, Springer, New York.
  • Magretta J. (2002), Why Business Models Matter, "Harvard Business Review", 3-8.
  • Meadows H. (2008), Thinking in Systems: A Primer, ed. D. Wright, White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
  • Moroz P., Hindle K. (2011), Entrepreneurship as a Process: Toward Harmonizing Multiple Perspectives, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 781-818.
  • Mullins J., Komisar R. (2009), Getting to Plan B, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston.
  • Murphy J. (2011), A 2 x 2 Conceptual Foundation for Entrepreneurial Discovery Theory, "Journal of Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice", 35, 359-374.
  • Murphy P., Marvel M. (2007), The Opportunity-Based Approach to Entrepreneurial Discovery Research [in:] M. Rahim, Current Topics in Management, Vol. 12, Transaction Publisher, London.
  • Pahl G., Beitz W. (1996), Engineering Design: A System Approach, Springer, New York.
  • Pahl G., Beitz W., Feldhusen J., Grote K. (2007), Engineering Design: A Systemic Approach, trans. K. Wallace, L. Blessing, Springer, London.
  • Ray S., Cardozo R. (1996), Sensitivity and Creativity in Entrepreneurial Opportunity Recognition: AFramework for Empirical Investigation, Global Entrepreneurship Research Conference, London.
  • Razzouk R., Shute V. (2012), What is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important?, "Review of Educational Research", 82(3), 330-348.
  • Sarasvathy S. (2001), Causation and Effectuation: Toward a Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency, "Academy of Management Review", 26(2), 243-263.
  • Schumpeter J. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, ed. R. Opie, Harvard UP, MA: Cambridge.
  • Shane S. (1999), Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities, "Organization Science", 11(4), 448.
  • Shane S. (2012), Reflections on The 2010 AMR Decade Award: Delivering on the Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research, "Academy of Management Review", 37(1), 10-20.
  • Shaver K., Scott L. (1991), Person, Process, Choice: The Psychology of New Venture Creation, "Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice", 23-45.
  • Sigrist B. (1999), Entrepreneurial Opportunity Recognition, A presentation at the annual UIC/ AMA symposium at Marketing/Entrepreneurial interface, Sofia-Antipolis.
  • Simon A. (1982), Models of Bounded Rationality, The MIT Press, MA: Cambridge.
  • Smith R., Matthews H., Schenkel T. (2009), Differences in Entrepreneurial Opportunity: The Role of Tacitness and Codification in Opportunity Identification, "Journal Of Small Business Management", 47(1), 38-57.
  • Stangler D. (2014), Kauffman Index of Entrepreneurial Activity, 1996-2013, Kauffman Foundation, Kansas City.
  • Wynn D., Clarkson P. (2005), Models of Design [in:] P. Clarkson, C. Eckert, Design Process Improvement: A review of current practice, Springer, London.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171475403

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.