Comparing Agile and Traditional Methodologies of Project Management for Software Engineering

• Autorzy: Manuel J. Garcia Rodriguez , Vicente Rodriguez Montequin , Joaquin Manuel Villanueva Baisera , Ramiro Suarez
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim this article is to study the newest methodologies of project management for software projects, especially the so called agile methodologies. These projects have a number of particularities that make them different from other engineering projects. The most important issue is that projects are labor intensive, the environment evolves rapidly and there is usually a poor scope definition. Consequently, these methodologies have to manage these troubles and get the project finished on time, cost and quality. New management approaches are emerging in this field. In this paper it will be analyzed the characteristics of the most used agile methodologies, comparing them to each other using as a comparison metric the areas of knowledge of the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK). (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Software; Information science; Project management

PL

Oprogramowanie; Informatyka; Zarządzanie projektem

• Czasopismo: Scientific Publications / University of Economics in Katowice
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Economics and management in information technology context : international week
• Strony: 64--75

Twórcy

autor

Manuel J. Garcia Rodriguez

• University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain

autor

Vicente Rodriguez Montequin

• University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain

autor

Joaquin Manuel Villanueva Baisera

• University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain

autor

Ramiro Suarez

• University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain

Bibliografia

• Bourque R., Fairley R.E. (eds.), Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK), version 3.0. IEEE Computer Society, 2014.
• The Standish Group, CHAOS Manifesto 2013,2013.
• Software Extension to the PMBOK Guide, Project Management Institute, 2013.
• A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), 5th edition, Project Management Institute, 2013.
• UNE-ISO 21500, Guidance on Project Management, AENOR, 2013.
• Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2, The Stationery Office, 2009.
• Methodological Guidelines for the Development of ICT Projects, Métrica Version 3, Ministry of Public Administration of Spain, 2000.
• Hoda R., Salleh N., Grundy J., Tee H.M., Systematic Literature Reviews in Agile Software Development: A Tertiary Study, "Information and Software Technology" 2017, Vol. 85.
• Pressman R.S., Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach, 7th edition. McGraw Hill, 2010.
• Shore J., Warden S., The Art of Agile Development, O "Reilly, Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol, CA 2008.
• Sommerville I., Software Engineering, 9th edition, Addison-Wesley, 2011.
• Schwaber K., Sutherland J., The Definitive Gidde to Scrum: The Rules of the Game, 2013.
• Beck K., Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River, NY 1999.
• Hirotaka T., Nonaka I., The New New Product Development Game, "Harvard Business Review" 1986, Vol. 64, No. 1 (January-February).
• Coad P., Lefebvre E., De Luca J., Java Modeling in Color with UML, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NY 1999.
• Palmer S., Felsin J., A Practical Guide to Feature Driven Development, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NY 2002.
• The Standish Group, CHAOS Manifesto 2015, 2015.
• Serrador P., Pinto J.K., Does Agile Work? - A Quantitative Analysis of Agile Project Success, "International Journal of Project Management" 2015, Vol. 33, Iss. 5.
• Spundak M., Mixed Agile/Traditional Project Management Methodology - Reality or Illusion?, 27th 1PMA World Congress, "Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences" 2014, Vol. 119.
• Binder J., IV Aillaud L., Schilli L., The Project Management Cocktail Model: An Approach for Balancing Agile and ISO 2150, 27th IPMA World Congress, "Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences" 2014, Vol. 119.