On the Babylonian Origin of Symbolic Logic

• Autorzy: Andrew Schumann
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The logical reasoning first appeared within the Babylonian legal tradition established by the Sumerians in the law codes which were first over the world: Ur-Nammu (ca. 2047 - 2030 B.C.); Lipit-Ishtar (ca. 1900 - 1850 B.C.), and later by their successors, the Akkadians: Hammurabi (1728 - 1686 B.C.). In these codes the casuistic law formulation began first to be used: "If/when (Akkadian: šumma) this or that occurs, this or that must be done" allowed the Akkadians to build up a theory of logical connectives: "... or...", "... and...", "if..., then...", "not..." that must have been applied in their jurisprudence. So, a trial decision looked like an inference by modus pones and modus tollens or by other logical rules from (i) some facts and (ii) an appropriate article in the law code represented by an ever true implication. The law code was announced by erecting a stele with the code or by engraving the code on a stone wall. It was considered a set of axioms announced for all. Then the trial decisions are regarded as claims logically inferred from the law code on the stones. The only law code of the Greeks that was excavated is the Code of Gortyn (Crete, the 5th century B.C.). It is so similar to the Babylonian codes by its law formulations; therefore, we can suppose that the Greeks developed their codes under a direct influence of the Semitic legal tradition: the code was represented as the words of the stele and the court was a logic application from these words. In this way the Greek logic was established within a Babylonian legal tradition, as well. Hence, we can conclude that, first, logic appeared in Babylonia and, second, it appeared within a unique legal tradition where all trial decisions must have been transparent, obvious, and provable. The symbolic logic appeared first not in Greece, but in Mesopotamia and this tradition was grounded in the Sumerian/Akkadian jurisprudence.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Logic; Law; Ancient history

PL

Logika; Prawo; Historia starożytna

• Czasopismo: Studia Humana
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 6(2)
• Strony: 126--154

Twórcy

autor

Andrew Schumann

• University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow

Bibliografia

• 1. Burrow, T. A Translation of the Kharosthi Documents from Chinese Turkestan. James G. Forlong Fund, Vol. XX. London: The Royal Asiatic Society, 1940. 154
• 2. Holtz, Shalom E. Neo-Babylonian Trial Records. Society of Biblical Literature Atlanta, 2014.
• 3. M. Tulli Ciceronis. Topica. Edited with a translation introduction, and commentary by Tobias Reinhardt. Oxford University Press, 2003.
• 4. Mukherjee, B.N. The Great Kushana Testament, Indian Museum Bulletin, Calcutta, 1995.
• 5. Roth, M. T. Law collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor. With a contribution by Harry A. Hoffner, Ir.; edited by Piotr Michalowski. Scholars Press Atlanta, Georgia. 1995.
• 6. Sims-Williams, N., and Cribb, J. A New Bactrian Inscription of Kanishka the Great, Silk Road Art and Archaeology. Volume 4, 1996, pp. 75 - 142.
• 7. Thapar, R. Aśoka and the Decline of the Mauryas. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1997.
• 8. The Law Code of Gortyn. Edited by Willetts, Ronald F. De Gruyter, 1967, pp. 37 - 50.
• 9. Veenhof, Klaas R. In Accordance with the Words of the Stele: Evidence for Old Assyrian Legislation, Chicago-Kent Law Review. Volume 70, Issue 4, 1995, pp. 1717 - 1744.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/sh-2017-0016