Rola sił zbrojnych w państwie : główne nurty teorii stosunków cywilno-wojskowych

• Autorzy: Rafał Pęksa

Warianty tytułu

The Role of Armed Strengths in the State : the Main Currents of Theory of the Civil and Military Relations

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

W artykule ukazano rolę sił zbrojnych w państwie z perspektywy głównych nurtów teorii stosunków cywilno-wojskowych. Stosunki cywilno-wojskowe stanowią interdyscyplinarną subdyscyplinę, która koncentruje się głównie na roli sił zbrojnych w państwie oraz ich miejscu i relacjach ze społeczeństwem. Obejmują one całe spektrum relacji pomiędzy rządem, społeczeństwem i siłami zbrojnymi. Ich istotę w społeczeństwach demokratycznych stanowi odpolitycznienie wojska, jego neutralność w kwestiach polityki państwa i podporządkowanie władzom cywilnym, które stanowią instytucjonalną formę wyrazu woli społeczeństwa. Analitycy stosunków cywilnowojskowych zwracają uwagę na szereg atrybutów niezbędnych dla sprawowania efektywnej demokratycznej kontroli nas siłami zbrojnymi. Często wskazuje się na reformy w sferze konstytucyjnej, administracyjnej, ekonomicznej, strukturalnej oraz społecznej, które pomocne są w osiąganiu zachodnich standardów stosunków cywilno-wojskowych. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

In the article there was showed the role of armed strengths in the state with perspective of main currents of the theory of the civil and military relations. The Civil and military relations state the interdisciplinary subdiscipline which focuses mainly on the role of armed strengths as well as their place and relations with society. They include the whole spectrum of the relations r among the government, the society and the armed strengths. Their essential matters in the democratic societies are the depoliticize of army, the neutrality of the state policy and the subordination of the civil administration which makes up the institutional form of the society will. The analysts of the civil and military relations pay the attention for many indispensable attributes helpful in the effective democratic control under the army. There was often showed on some reforms in constitutional, administrative, economic, structural and social sphere which are helpful in achieving the western standards of the civil and military relations.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Wojsko; Konflikty zbrojne; Bezpieczeństwo narodowe; Społeczeństwo demokratyczne

EN

Army; Armed conflicts; National security; Democratic society

• Czasopismo: Doctrina. Studia społeczno-polityczne
• Rocznik: 2012
• Numer: nr 9
• Strony: 211--237

Twórcy

autor

Rafał Pęksa

Bibliografia

• W. Lenin, Państwo i rewolucja, w: Lenin. Dzieła wybrane, t. 2, Warszawa 1978, s. 526.
• M. Weber, Politics as a Vocations, w: H.H. Gerth, C. W. Mills (red.), From Max Weber Essays in Sociology, New York 1946, s. 98.
• M. Weber, Polityka jako zawód i powołanie, Kraków/Warszawa 1998.
• A. Heywood, Politologia, Warszawa 2009, s. 466.
• P. Schmitter, Foreword, w: C. Danopoulos, D. Zirker (red.), Civil-Military Relations in the Soviet Union and Yugoslav Successor States, Boulder 1996, s. XII.
• A. Cottey, T. Edmonts, A. Foster, Democratic Control of the Military in PostCommunist Europe, Hampshire/New York, 2002, s. 7.
• H. von Riekhoff, Introduktion, w: N .L. Mychajlyszyn, H. von Riekhoff (red.), The Evolution of Civil-Military Relations In East-Central Europe and The Former Soviet Union, London 2004, s. 5-6.
• P. Volten, M. Drent, Civil Direction of the Military: Redefining the Balance in France, Germany, Romania and the United Kingdom, w: A. Aldis, M. Drent (red.), Common Norms and God Practices of Civil Military Relations in the EU, Groningen 2008, s. 15-16.
• M. Yaniszewski, Civil-Military Relations in Postcommunist Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union: Some Theoretical Issues, w: N. L. Mychajlyszyn, H. von Riekhoff (red.), The Evolution of Civil-Military Relations In East-Central Europe and The Former Soviet Union, London 2004, s. 30-33.
• C. von Clausewitz, O wojnie, Kraków 2007. Zob. także: D. Schössler, Clausewitz, Lublin 1991.
• S. P. Huntington, The Soldier and the State. The Theory of Civil-Military Relations, Cambridge/London 1985, s. 57.
• B. R. Posen, The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany Between the World Wars, Ithaca/London 1984
• J. Snyder, The Ideology of the Offensive: Military Decision Making and the Disasters of 1914. Ithaca 1984.
• S. Finer, The Man on Horseback: The Role of Military in Politics, London 1967
• M. Janowitz, The Professional Soldier. A Social and Political Portrait, Glencoe 1960
• A. Perlmutter, The Military and Politics in Modern Times: On Professionals, Praetorians, and Revolutionary Soldiers, New Haven 1977.
• E. A. Nordlinger, Soldiers in Politics. Military Coups and Governments, London 1977.
• J. Burk, Theories of Democratic Civil-Military Relations, "Armed Forces & Society" 2002, Vol. 29 No. 1, s. 7-29
• P. Feaver, Civil-Military Relations, "Annual Review of Political Science" 1999, No. 2, s. 211-241.
• S. E. Finer, The History of Government from the Earliest Times, Oxford 1999.
• The Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society, http://www. iusafs.org/ (1.06.2011).
• J. Burk, Morris Janowitz and the Origins of Sociological Research on Armed Forces and Society, "Armed Forces and Society" Winter 1993, Vol. 19, No. 2, s. 167-185.
• Reforming Civil-Military Relations, "Journal of Democracy", October 1995, Vol. 6, No. 6, s. 9-17.
• P. D. Feaver, The Civil-Military Problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the Question of Civilian Control, "Armed Forces & Society", Winter 1996, Vol. 23, No. 2, s. 161.
• R. Schiff, Civil-Military Relations Reconsidered: A Theory of Concordance, "Armed Forces and Society", Fall 1995, Vol. 22, No. 1, s. 7-24.
• A. Aldis, M. Drent, Common Norms and Good Practices of Civil-Military Relations in the EU, Groningen 2008. S. 182.
• B. Abrahamson, Military Professionalization and Political Power, Beverly Hiils 1972, s. 160.
• D. Bland, A Unified Theory of Civil-Military Relations, "Armed Forces & Society", Fall 1999, Vol.26, No. 1, s. 7-25.
• S. P. Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies, Yale 1997.
• M. Desch, Civilian Control of the Military: The Changing Security Environment, Baltimore/London, 1999.
• Ch. C. Moskos, J. A. Williams, R. Segal, The Postmodern Military: Armed Forces after the Cold War, New York 2000. 41
• G. D. Foster, Civil-Military Relations, The Postmodern Democratic Challenge, "World Affairs", Winter 2005, Vol. 167, No. 3, s. 91-100.
• On Strategy: A Critical Analysis of the Vietnam War, Novato 1982.
• H. R. McMaster, Dereliction of Duty: Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, The Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies that Led to Vietnam, New York 1998.
• P. Faver, Crisis as Shrinking: An Agency Theory Explanation of the Souring of American Civil-Military Relations, "Armed Forces and Society", Spring 1998, Vol. 24, No. 3, s. 407-434.
• L. R. Schiff, The Military and Domestic Politics, New York 2009.
• P. D. Feaver, The Civil-Military Problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the Question of Civilian Control, "Armed Forces and Society", Winter 1996, Vol. 23, No. 2, s. 168.
• Ch. W. Mayness, The Perils Of (and For) an Imperial America, "Foreign Policy", Summer 1998, No. 111, s. 36-47.
• P. D. Feaver, R. H. Kohn, The Gap. Soldiers, Civilians and their Misunderstanding, "The National Interest", Fall 2000, s. 30. 53
• P. D. Feaver, The Civil-Military Gap in Comparative Perspective, "The Journal of Strategic Studies", June 2003, Vol. 26 , No. 2, s. 1-5
• P. D. Feaver, R. H. Kohn (red.), Soldiers and Civilians. The Civil-Military Gap and American National Security, Cambridge 2001.
• R. D. Hooker Jr., Soldiers of the State: Reconsidering American Civil-Military Relations, "Parameters" Winter 2003-04, s. 11.
• D. Johnson, S. Metz, American Civil-Military Relations: New Issues, Enduring Problems, Carlisle Barracks 1995, s. 14.
• V. D. Hanson, Armies for Democracy - Past, Present and Future, "The American Spectator" July/August 2007, s. 36.
• G. Sulmasy, J. Yoo, Challenges to Civilian Control of the Military: A Rational Choice Approach to the War on Terror, "54 UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) Law Review" 2007, 1815, s. 1819.
• T. Bruneau, H. Trinkunas, Democratization as Global Phenomenon and its Impact on Civil-Military Relations, "Democratization" 2006 Vol. 13, Issue 15 , s. 784.
• T. C. Bruneau, F. C. Matei, Towards a New Conceptualization of Democratization and Civil-Military Relations, "Democratization", December 2008, Vol. 15, No 5, s. 910.
• J. Linz, A. Stepan, Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe, Baltimore 1996.
• A. Przeworski, Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America, New York 1991
• P. Schmitter, The Consolidation of Political Democracies: Processes, Rhythms, Sequences, and Type, w: G. Pridham (red.), Transitions to Democracy, Dartmouth 1995
• A. Cottey, T. Edmunds, A. Forster (red.), Democratic Control of the Military in Postcommunist Europe: Guarding the Guards, New York 2002
• D. Pion-Berlin, Through Corridors of Power: Institutions and Civil-Military Relations in Argentina, University Park 1997
• D. Pion-Berlin (red.), Civil-Military Relations in Latin America: New Analytical Perspectives, Chapel Hill 2001
• A. Stepan, Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone, Princeton 1988
• H. A. Trinkunas, Crafting Civilian Control of the Armed Forces in Venezuela: A Comparative Perspective, University of North Carolina Press, 2006
• U. Marybeth, Democratizing Communist Militaries: The Cases of the Czech and Russian Armed Forces, Ann Arbor 1999
• C. Bruneau, F. C. Matei, s. 914
• D. E. Davis, A. W. Pereira, Irregular Armed Forces and Their Role in Politics and State Formation, Cambridge 2003.
• http://www.ccmr-bg.org/Centre+for+Civil-Military+ Relations% 2C+ Belgrade/1124/About+Us.shtml (22.06.2011).
• S. C. Nielsen, Civil-Military Relations Theory and Military Effectiveness, "Policy and Management Reviev", 2002, Vol. 2, No. 2, s. 1-21.