Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | z. 67, nr 1214 | 119--124
Tytuł artykułu

Peer Paired Ranking: Assessing and Training 21st Century Graduates

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
In the context of European Higher Education, universities are highly adopting innovative curricula focused on students acquisition of skills and competences needed for the further career development of the 21st century graduates [1][2]. Particularly, Universitat Politécnica de Valencia (UPV) (Spain), has launched an institutional Project on transversal skills UPV (i.e. skills acquired by the UPV graduates). This project is supported by the strategic plan UPV2020. Its main goal is to accredit, by using rubrics, 13 transversal skills of any graduate from the Universitat Politècnica de València [3].(fragment of text)
Słowa kluczowe
Opis fizyczny
  • Universitat Politècnica de València (Spain)
  • Universitat Politècnica de València (Spain)
  • Universitat Politècnica de València (Spain)
  • Universitat Politècnica de València (Spain)
  • [1] EHEA, Bologna-process European Higher Education Area. History, 2014.
  • [2] Reinalda B. and Publishers B.B.: The Bologna Process - Harmonizing Europe's Higher Education, 2005.
  • [3] ICE, Proyecto de competencias transversalesUPV. Rúbricas, 2015.
  • [4] Grao J., Carot J.M., Mora J.G., Ochoa C., Pérez P.J., Uriarte C. and Vila L.E.: Aportación de la universidad y de la experiencia laboral al desarrollo de competencias en la juventud egresada, Investig. Econ. la Educ., Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 563-576, 2011.
  • [5] Anderson R.S.: Why talk about different ways to grade? The shift from traditional assessment to alternative assessment, New Dir. Teach. Learn., Vol. 74, pp. 5-16, 1998.
  • [6] Christoforou A.P. and Yigit A.S.: Improving teaching and learning in engineering education through a continuous assessment process, Eur. J. Eng. Educ., Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 105-116, 2008.
  • [7] Reiter H.I., Eva K.W., Hatala R.M. and Norman G.R.: Self and peer assessment in tutorials: application of a relative-ranking model., Acad. Med., Vol. 77, No. 11, pp. 1134-1139, 2002.
  • [8] Nicol D.J. and Macfarlane-Dick D.: Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice, Stud. High. Educ., Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 199-218, 2006.
  • [9] Higgins M. and Grant F.: Formative Assessment: Balancing Educational Effectiveness and Resource Efficiency, Education, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 4-24, 2010.
  • [10] Vickerman P.: Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: an attempt to deepen learning?, Assess. Eval. High. Educ., Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 221-230, 2009.
  • [11] Ohland M.W., Loughry M.L., Woehr D.J., Bullard L.G., Felder R.M., Finelli C.J., Layton R.A., Pomeranz H.R. and Schmucker D.G.: The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self- and Peer Evaluation, Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ., Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 609-631, 2012.
  • [12] Sluijsmans D., Dochy F. and Moerkerke G.: Creating a learning environment by using self-, peer-and co-assessment, Learn. Environ. Res., pp. 293-319, 1998.
  • [13] Tu Y. and Lu M.: Peer-and-Self Assessment to Reveal the Ranking of Each Individual's Contribution to a Group Project., J. Inf. Syst. Educ., Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 197-205, 2005.
  • [14] Lai C.-L. and Hwang G.-J.: An interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving students' art design performance using handheld devices, Comput. Educ., Vol. 85, pp. 149-159, 2015.
  • [15] Fürnkranz J. and Hüllermeier E. (Eds.): Preference Learning. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011.
  • [16] Kadziński M., Słowiński R. and Greco S.: Multiple criteria ranking and choice with all compatible minimal cover sets of decision rules, Knowledge-Based Syst., Vol. 89, pp. 569-583, 2015.
  • [17] Adler N., Friedman L. and Sinuany-Stern Z.: Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context, Eur. J. Oper. Res., Vol. 140, No. 2, pp. 249-265, Jul. 2002.
  • [18] Hullermeier E. and Furnkranz J.: Ranking by Pairwise Comparison: A Note on Risk Minimization, Fuzzy Syst. 2004. Proceedings. 2004 IEEE Int. Conf., Vol. 1, pp. 97-102, 2004.
  • [19] Tavana M., Di Caprio D. and Santos-Arteaga F.J.: An ordinal ranking criterion for the subjective evaluation of alternatives and exchange reliability, Inf. Sci. (Ny), Vol. 317, pp. 295-314, 2015.
  • [20] Tran N.M.: Pairwise ranking: Choice of method can produce arbitrarily different rank order, Linear Algebra Appl., Vol. 438, No. 3, pp. 1012-1024, 2013.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.