Usługi biznesowe oparte na wiedzy a innowacyjność przedsiębiorstw przetwórczych w krajach Unii Europejskiej

• Autorzy: Joanna Wyszkowska-Kuna

Warianty tytułu

Knowledge-intensive business services and the innovativeness of manufacturing companies in the European Union

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Celem artykułu jest zbadanie poziomu wykorzystania KIBS (knowledge-intensive business services) i efektów działalności innowacyjnej, mierzonej za pomocą liczby zgłoszeń patentowych, w przedsiębiorstwach z działów przetwórczych. W badaniu wykorzystano analizę porównawczą oraz korelację rang. Wykorzystano dane z bazy WIOD (World Input-Output Database) i Eurostatu. Badaniem objęto przedsiębiorstwa z krajów UE w latach 1995-2012. Wykazano, że kraje UE-15 charakteryzowały się większym poziomem wykorzystania KIBS i innowacyjności niż kraje UE-12. Istnieje dodatnia, statystycznie istotna zależność między wydatkami na zakup KIBS, zarówno definiowanymi szeroko, jak i wąsko, a liczbą zgłoszeń patentowych w firmach przetwórczych. Silniejsza zależność występowała w przypadku wydatków na KIBS definiowane wąsko, a ponadto w działach bardziej zaawansowanych technologicznie. Wyniki te mają potencjalne implikacje dla polityki innowacyjnej, która obecnie skoncentrowana jest na wspieraniu działalności B+R. Badanie wykazało, że aby wzmocnić innowacyjność przedsiębiorstw przetwórczych wskazane jest również wsparcie dla rozwoju przedsiębiorstw świadczących KIBS oraz systemów innowacji z ich udziałem. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The aim of this article is to examine the innovation performance of manufacturing companies across the European Union and their use of knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) as measured by the number of patent applications. Methodology of this research concentrates on the use of comparative analysis and the rank correlation. The study is based on data from the World Input-Output Database (WIOD) and Eurostat. It covers EU countries in the 1995-2012 period. The study results show that manufacturing companies in EU15 countries were more intensive and more innovative in terms of KIBS in the study period than manufacturing companies in EU12 countries. There is a positive, statistically significant correlation between KIBS intensity in both the broad and narrow sense and the number of patent applications filed by manufacturing companies. A stronger correlation occurred with respect to KIBS in the narrow sense and in more technologically advanced sectors. The findings of the study have potential implications for innovation policy, which is currently focused on supporting R&D activities. The study shows that, in order to strengthen the innovativeness of manufacturing companies, it is necessary to support not only R&D activities but also the development of KIBS companies and the innovation systems they help create. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Usługi biznesowe; Gospodarka oparta na wiedzy (GOW); Produkt oparty na wiedzy; Wiedzochłonne usługi biznesowe; Innowacyjność; Przetwórstwo przemysłowe

EN

Business services; Knowledge-based economy; Knowledge-based product; Knowledge Intensive Business Services (KIBS); Innovative character; Manufacturing

• Czasopismo: Gospodarka Narodowa
• Rocznik: 2017
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 99--120

Twórcy

autor

Joanna Wyszkowska-Kuna

• Uniwersytet Łódzki

Bibliografia

• Aarikka-Stenroos L., Jaakkola E. [2012], Value co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: a dyadic perspective on the joint problem solving process, "Industrial Marketing Management", vol. 41 (1): 15-26.
• Baláž V. [2004a], Knowledge-intensive business services in transition economies, "The Service Industries Journal", vol. 24 (4): 83-100.
• Baláž V. [2004b.], Patterns of intermediate consumption and productivity in the knowledge intensive services in transition economies, "Ekonomický časopis", vol. 52 (3): 298-314.
• Barras R. [1986], Towards a theory of innovation in services, Research Policy, vol. 15 (4): 161-73.
• Bessant J., Rush H. [1995], Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer, "Research Policy", vol. 24 (1): 97-114.
• Bessant J., Rush H. [2000], Innovation agents and technology transfer, w: Services, innovation and knowledge-based economy, red. M. Boden, I. Miles, Continuum, London: 155-169.
• Comanor W. S. [1965], Research and technical change in the pharmaceutical industry, "Review of Economics and Statistics", vol. 47 (2): 182-190.
• Crepon B., Duguet E., Mairesse J. [1998], Research, innovation and productivity: an econometric analysis at the firm level, "Economics of Innovation and New Technology", vol. 7 (2): 115-158.
• Czarnitzki D., Spielkamp A. [2000], Business services in Germany: bridges for innovation, ZEW Discussion Paper, no. 00-52, http://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/24400/1/dp0052.pdf (22.10.2014).
• Eurostat, OECD [2005], The measurement of scientific and technological activities, Oslo manual, guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3 rd ed., Eurostat, OECD, Paris, http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/2367580.pdf (28.09.2011).
• Eurostat [2015a], Exchange rates: historical data (ert_h), Eurostat, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/exchange-rates/data/database (15.01.2015).
• Eurostat [2015b], Eurostat indicators of high-tech industry and knowledge - intensive services, Annex 2 - high-tech aggregation by NACE Rev. 1.1, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/Annexes/htec_esms_an2.pdf (23.01.2015).
• Eurostat [2016], Science and technology, intelectual property rights: patent applications to the EPO by priority yearby NACE Rev. 1.1 activity (pat_ep_nnac), Eurostat, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/science-technology-innovation/data/database (7.12.2016).
• Eurostat [2017], National accounts (including GDP): national accounts aggregates by industry (up to NACE A*64) (nama_10_a64), Eurostat, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/exchangerates/data/database (10.03.2017).
• Felix B. [2007], Innovative enterprises and the use of patents and other intellectual property rights, "Statistics in Focus", no. 91, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3433488/5298513/KS-SF-07-091-EN.PDF/3cc14bff-1c37-405c-9704-5659f006d623?version=1.0 (25.11.2015).
• Gallouj F. [1999], Interactional innovation: a neo-Schumpeterian model, Managing Innovation and the External Context, Roskilde University, https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01113802/document (10.05.2015).
• Gallouj F. [2002], Services innovation: assimilation, differentiation, inversion and integration, MPRA Paper, no. 62174, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/62174/ (10.03.2015).
• Garcia-Quevedo J., Mas-Verdu F. [2008], Does only size matter in the use of knowledge intensive services? "Small Business Economics", vol. 31 (2): 137-146.
• Gershuny J. I., Miles I. D. [1983], The new service economy, the transformation of employment in industrial societies, Pinter Publishers, London.
• Griliches Z. [1986], Productivity, R and D, and basic research at the firm level in the 1970's, "American Economic Review", vol. 76 (1): 141-154.
• GUS [2012], Działalność innowacyjna przedsiębiorstw w latach 2010-2012, Informacje i Opracowania Statystyczne, GUS, Urząd Statystyczny w Szczecinie, Warszawa.
• Hashi I., Stojcic N. [2012], The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: evidence from the community innovation survey 4, Working Paper, no. 001, Staffordshire University Business School, Centre for Applied Business Research.
• Hertog P. den [2000], Knowledge intensive business services as co-producers of innovation, "International Journal of Innovation Management", vol. 4 (4): 491-528.
• Hill T. P. [1999], Tangibles, intangibles and services: a new taxonomy for the classification of output, "Canadian Journal of Economics", vol. 32 (2): 426-446.
• Kline S. J., Rosenberg N. [1986], An overview of innovation, w: The positive sum strategy: harnessing technology for economic growth, red. R. Landau, N. Rosenberg, National Academy Press, Washington: 275-305.
• Koch A., Strotmann H. [2008], Absorptive capacity and innovation in the knowledge intensive business sector, "Economics of Innovation and New Technology", vol. 17 (6): 511-531.
• Koeller C. T. [1995], Innovation, market structure and firm size: a simultaneous equations model, "Managerial and Decision Economics", vol. 16 (3): 259-269.
• Kuusisto J., Meyer M. [2002], Insights into services and innovation in the knowledge-intensive economy, "Technology Review", no. 134, Helsinki, Tekes, www.tekes.fi/globalassets/julkaisut/insights.pdf (6.11.2014).
• Lööf H., Heshmati A. [2000], Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: a firm level innovation study, SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, no. 387, ftp://85.185.161.2/YSTP/1/1/ROOT/DATA/PDF/INNOVATION/hastef0387.pdf (4.09.2016).
• Lundvall B. A. [2010], National systems of innovation, toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning, Anthem Press, London.
• Majewska J., Truskolaski Sz. [2013], Usługi wiedzochłonne w stymulowaniu innowacyjności w Polsce, "Gospodarka Narodowa", nr 1-2 (257-258): 91-108.
• Metcalfe J. S., Miles I. (red.) [2000], Innovation systems in the service economy, measurement and case study analysis, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht.
• Miles I., Kastrinos N., Flanagan K., Bilderbeek R., Hertog P. den, Huntink W., Bouman M. [1995], Knowledge-intensive business services: users, carriers and sources of innovation, EIMS Publication, no.15, Luxembourg, https://research.mbs.ac.uk/INNOVATION/Portals/0/docs/KIBSEIMS1995shortreport.pdf (7.09.2014).
• Miozzo M., Grimshaw D. P. [2006], Knowledge intensive business services, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
• Muller E., Zenker A. [2001], Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems, "Research Policy", vol. 30 (9): 1501-1516.
• Porter M. E., Stern S. [2000], Measuring the "ideas" production function: evidence from international patent output, NBER Working Paper, no. 7891.
• Pułaska-Turyna B. [2005], Statystyka dla ekonomistów, Difin, Warszawa.
• Rothwell R. [1992], Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990 s, "R&D Management", vol. 22 (3): 221-239.
• Skórska A. [2012], Wiedzochłonne usługi biznesowe w Polsce i w innych krajach Unii Europejskiej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, Katowice.
• Strambach S. [2001], Innovation processes and the role of knowledge-intensive business services, w: Innovation networks - concepts and challenges in the European perspective, red. K. Koschatzky, M. Kulicke, A. Zenker, Physica, Heidelberg: 53-68.
• Vernon J. M., Gusen P. [1974], Technical change and firm size: the pharmaceutical industry, "Review of Economics and Statistics", vol. 56 (3): 294-302.
• WIOD [2013], World input-output tables, international supply and use tables: national Supply and use tables, WIOD database, www.wiod.org (5.11.2013).
• WIOD [2016], World input-output tables, international supply and use tables: national supply and use tables, WIOD database, www.wiod.org (9.12.2016).
• Wong P. K., He Z. L. [2002], The impacts of knowledge interaction with manufacturing clients on KIBS firms' innovation behaviour, Discussion Paper, no. 69, WIDER, http://archive.unu.edu/hq/library/Collection/PDF_files/WIDER/WIDERdp200269.pdf (7.09.2014).
• Wyszkowska-Kuna J. [2016], Usługi biznesowe oparte na wiedzy. Wpływ na konkurencyjność gospodarki na przykładzie wybranych krajów Unii Europejskiej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź.
• Yam R. C., Lo W., Tang E. P., Lau A. K. [2011], Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: an empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries, "Research Policy", vol. 40 (3): 391-402.
• Zemplinerová A., Hromádková E. [2012], Determinants of firms' innovation, "Prague Economic Papers", vol. 21 (4): 487-503.