Granice prawa do samoobrony państw w prawie międzynarodowym publicznym

• Autorzy: Paweł Mielniczek

Warianty tytułu

Limits of the Right to Self-Defence of States in Public International Law

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Celem niniejszego opracowania jest odnalezienie granic prawa do samoobrony państw w prawie międzynarodowym publicznym. Zbadanie czy danego rodzaju sytuacje są objęte omawianym prawem, wymaga analizy zasad stosowania obydwu wariantów tego prawa, takich jak nagłość, konieczność i proporcjonalność. Użyta w artykule metoda ustalania granic, a zatem i dokładnej treści prawa do samoobrony, polega na czytelnym określeniu poszczególnych zasad jego stosowania, a następnie zestawieniu ich z sytuacjami, które budzą największe wątpliwości. (fragment tekstu)

EN

The right to self-defence in the public international law has two different variants: the right to self-defence of individuals and groups of individuals and the right to self-defence of states. Both of these constructions base on the same core concepts, but this article focuses on the specifics of the right to self-defence of states. First, it clarifies the list of general rules governing this variant of the right to self-defence and indicates their initial meaning. Then, it proceeds to critical analysis of each of these requirements and tries to find answers to the following disputed questions: What constitutes an armed attack? Who can commit it? Is the anticipatory self-defence lawful? What exactly is required by the notions of necessity and proportionality? Who can take part in the collective self-defence? (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Bezpieczeństwo narodowe; Bezpieczeństwo publiczne; Prawo międzynarodowe

EN

National security; Public security; International law

• Czasopismo: Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie
• Rocznik: 2016
• Numer: t. 17, z. 5, cz. 2 Bezpieczeństwo i zarządzanie kryzysowe - nowe wyzwania bezpieczeństwa narodowego
• Strony: 97--109

Twórcy

autor

Paweł Mielniczek

• Uniwersytet Warszawski

Bibliografia

• Bethlehem D. (2012), Principles Relevant to the Scope of State's Right of Self-Defense Against an Imminent or Actual Armed Attack by Nonstate Actors, "American Journal of International Law", z. 106.
• Bonacker T., Safferling C. (red.) (2013), Victims of International Crimes: An Interdisciplinary Discourse, T.M.C. Asser Press.
• Crawford J. (2013), State Responsibility, The General Part, Cambridge University Press.
• Gardocki L. (2010), Prawo karne, 16 wyd., C.H. Beck.
• Gillett M. (2013), The Anatomy of an International Crime: Aggression at the International Criminal Court, "International Criminal Law Review", z. 13, nr 4.
• Greenwood C. (2009), Caroline, The, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law.
• Greenwood C. (2011), Self-Defence, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law.
• Hakimi M. (2015), Defensive Force against Non-State Actors: The State of Play, "International Law Studies", z. 91, nr 1.
• Harris D. (2010), Cases and Materials on International Law, 7 wyd., Sweet & Maxwell.
• Kaleck W. i inni (red.) (2007), International Prosecution of Human Rights Crimes, Springer.
• Klabbers J. (2013), International Law, Cambridge University Press.
• Nayak G., Chhaba R. (2012), The Right of Self-Defence under International Law, "International, Transnational & Comparative Criminal Law eJournal", z. 6, nr 1.
• Otto R. (2012), Targeted Killings and International Law, Springer.
• Paust J. (2010), Self-Defense Targetings of Non-State Actors and Permissibility of U.S. Use of Drones in Pakistan, "Journal of Transnational Law & Policy", z. 19, nr 2.
• Romer J. (2010), Killing in a Gray Area between Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, How Can the National Police of Colombia Overcome the Uncertainty of Which Branch of International Law to Apply?, Springer.
• Sayapin S. (2014), The Crime of Aggression in International Criminal Law, Historical Development, Comparative Analysis and Present State, T.M.C. Asser Press.
• Scharf M. (2013), Customary International Law in Times of Fundamental Change, Recognizing Grotian Moments, Cambridge University Press.
• Scott S. (2012), International Law, US Power: The United States' Quest for Legal Security, Cambridge University Press.
• Sellars K. (2013), Crimes against Peace and International Law, Cambridge University Press.
• Shaw M. (2008), International Law, 6 wyd., Cambridge University Press.
• Tsagourias N. (2012), Cyber attacks, self- defence and the problem of attribution, "Journal of Conflict & Security Law", z. 17, nr 2.
• Van den hole L. (2003), Anticipatory Self-Defence Under International Law, "American University International Law Review", z. 19, nr 1.
• Vatanparast R. (2008), International Law Versus The Preemptive Use of Force: Racing to Confront the Specter of a Nuclear Iran, "Hastings International & Comparative Law Review", z. 31.
• Wade M., Maljević A. (red.) (2010), A War on Terror? The European Stance on a New Threat, Changing Laws and Human Rights Implications, Springer.