Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | 8 | nr 3 | 433--446
Tytuł artykułu

Analysis of State Aid Policy to Stimulate Innovation and Internationalization in Lithuanian Animation Industry

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Research background: In order to achieve systematic development and growth of creative industries, instead of its being a random process, effective cultural policy tools need to be implemented. This task is greatly burdened by the fact that creative industries are a heterogeneous concept. Evidence suggests that indirect state aid is one of the most effective ways to stimulate growth and development of audiovisual segment. Lithuanian indirect state aid case suggests that there is still a great deal of confusion and misconception with the implementation and exploitation of this tool.
Purpose of the article: To analyze how effectively indirect state aid is constructed to stimulate growth and development of the Lithuanian animation industry.
Methods: This paper uses two methods to gather data. The first one is a quantitative questionnaire design to evaluate the overall situation of Lithuanian animation industry. The second method involves qualitative semi-structured interviews to collect specific data about Lithuanian film tax incentive from representatives of government institutions that administrate local fiscal incentive scheme and representatives of audiovisual industries.
Findings & Value added: Results show that although Lithuanian film tax incentive can be considered as a successful cultural policy tool that brought a noticeable inward investment to the local film industry and economy in general, it had no positive effect on the local animation industry. The gathered evidence suggests that indirect aid tool should be constructed with more of surgical precision for each industry, rather than a fit-for-all cultural policy tool. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania
  • Eastern Macedonia & Thrace Institute of Technology, Greece
  • Adkisson R.V. (2013). Policy convergence, state film-production incentives, and employment: a brief case study. Journal of Economic Issues, 47(2). doi: 10.2753/JEI0021-3624460218
  • BBC (2013). British film culture test to change. Retrieved form
  • BFI (2016). Statistical Yearbook 2016. London: British Film Institute.
  • Caldwell J.T. (2008). Screen practice and conglomeration: how reflexivity and conglomeration fuel each other. In: R. Kolker (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of film and media studies. Oxford: OUP.
  • Crane D. (2014). Cultural globalization and the dominance of the American film industry: cultural policies, national film industries, and transnational film. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 20(4). doi: 10.1080/10286632.2013.832233.
  • Creative Europe (2009). Creative Europe programme. Retrieved form
  • Creative Europe (2009). Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos Reglamentas (ES) No. 1295/2013. 2013 m. gruodžio 11 d. kuriuo sukuriama programa "Kūrybiška Europa" (2014-2020 m.) ir panaikinami sprendimai No. 1718/2006/EB, No. 1855/2006/EB ir No. 1041/2009/EB.
  • Davenport J. (2006). UK film companies: project-based organizations lacking entrepreneurship and innovativeness?. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00394.x.
  • de la Garza A. (2016). Film policy under globalization: the case of Mexico. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 22(5). doi: 10.1080/10286632.2016.1223639.
  • EU Regulations (2015). Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1588 of 13 July 2015 on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of horizontal State aid. 13 July 2015.
  • EU Regulations. (2015). Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1588 of 13 July 2015 on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of horizontal State aid.
  • Europe 2020 (2010). Communication from the Commission Europe 2020 a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels: European Commission.
  • EC (2013). Communication from the Commission on state aid for films and other audiovisual works. (2013/C 332/01). Official Journal of the European Union.
  • European Commission (2013). Towards knowledge-driven reindustrialization. European Commission.
  • Film France (2017). Film France. Retrieved from
  • FNE (2017). Film new Europe. Retrieved from
  • Grand J. (2006). Motion picture tax incentives: there's no business like show business. State Tax Notes, 39(10).
  • Lithuanian Creative Industry Policy Guidelines for 2016-2020 timeframe (2015). Dėl kultūros ir kūrybinių industrijų politikos 2015-2020 metų plėtros krypčių patvirtinimo (2015 liepos 31 d.).
  • Lithuanian Republic Ministry of Culture Policy Guideline (2007). ĮSAKY MAS Dėl Kūrybinių Industrijų Skatinimo ir Plėtros Strategijos Patvirtinimo. 2007 m. kovo 28 d. Nr. ĮV-217. Vilnius.
  • LKC (2017). Lithuanian film centre. Retrieved form
  • Lorenzen M. (2007). Internationalization vs. globalization of the film industry. Industry and Innovation, 14(4). doi: 10.1080/13662710701543650.
  • Luther W. (2010). Movie production incentives: blockbuster support for lackluster policy. Tax Foundation Special Report, 173 (January).
  • Mitkus T. (2011). Lietuvos kino industrija XXI a.: valstybės remiamas menas ar verslas? Santalka. Filosofija. Komunikacija, 19(2).
  • Mitkus T., & Nedzinskaite-Mitke V. (2015). The impact of globalization to creative industries: the analysis of film industries of Central and Eastern Europe. Creative Studies, 9(1). doi: 10.3846/23450479.2015.1126539.
  • Mitkus T., & Nedzinskaite-Mitke V. (2017). Promoting competitiveness in creative industries: changes and trends of Lithuanian film industry in 21st century. Creative Studies, doi: 10.3846/23450479.2016.1207719.
  • Morawetz N., Hardy J., Haslam C., & Randle K. (2007). Finance, policy and industrial dynamics - the rise of co-productions in the film industry. Industry and Innovation, 14(4). doi: 10.1080/13662710701524072.
  • NCSL (2016). State film production incentives and programs. National Conference of State Legislatures. Retrieved from
  • Olsberg J., & Barnes A. (2014). Impact analysis of fiscal incentive schemes supporting film and audiovisual production in Europe. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.
  • Ritman A. (2017). U.K. film industry sees record spending from Hollywood productions in 2016. The Hollywood reporter. Retrieved from
  • Schuster J.M. (2006). Tax incentives in cultural Policy. Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, 1. doi: 10.1016/S1574-0676(06)01036-2.
  • UNCTAD (2008). Creative economy report 2008. United Nation.
  • UNESCO (2009). Measuring the economic contribution of cultural industries: a review and assessment of current methodological approaches. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
  • WIPO (2015). Guide on surveying the economic contribution of the copyright industries 2015 revised edition. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
  • Yoon H., & Malecki E.J. (2010). Cartoon planet: worlds of production and global production networks in the animation industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(1). doi: 10.1093/icc/dtp040.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.