PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | nr 323 | 98--106
Tytuł artykułu

Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Project Environment Using Decision Trees and Real Options - a Comparison of Methods

Warianty tytułu
Wielokryterialne decyzje w projektowaniu środowiskowym wykorzystujące drzewa decyzyjne i opcje realne - porównanie metod
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
Złożoność nowoczesnych projektów sprawia, że zarządzanie ma kluczowe znaczenie. Niestabilne środowisko XXI w. oznacza, że ważne jest, aby podjąć właściwą decyzję w odpowiednim momencie. W trakcie realizacji projektu konieczne jest podjęcie wielu decyzji osadzonych w czasie. Ponadto często ocena tych decyzji zależy od wielu kryteriów. W celu rozwiązania takich sytuacji pojawiają się dwa podejścia: wielokryterialne drzewo decyzyjne i wielostanowe opcje realne (MSRO). W pracy porównano obszary zastosowań, ograniczenia i zalety tych metod. W rezultacie stwierdzono, że metoda MSRO jest bardziej specyficzna i może być stosowana tylko w sytuacjach, w których istnieją opcje realne.(abstrakt oryginalny)
EN
The complexity of modern projects makes the proper management crucial. The volatile environment of the XXI century means that it is important to choose the right decision at the right moment. During the life of project there is the need to make many decisions, which are embedded in time. Moreover, in many cases evaluation of these decisions depends on multiple criteria. Two approaches are poposed to deal with such situation: Multicriteria Decision Tree and Multi-State Real Options (MSRO). The paper compares areas of applicability, limitations and advantages of these methods. As result, it is concluded, that MSRO method is more specific and can be used only in situations where exist real options.(original abstract)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
98--106
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
  • University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
  • University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Boyle P.P. (1988), A Lattice Framework for Option Pricing with Two State Variables, "Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis", Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 1-12.
  • Chiu L., Gear T.E. (1979), An Application and Case History of a Dynamic R&D Portfolio Selection Model, "IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage", Vol. 26, pp. 2-7.
  • Comello S.D., Lepech M.D., Schwegler B. (2012), Project-Level Assessment of Environmental Impact: Ecosystem Services Approach to Sustainable Management and Development, "Journal of Management in Engineering", Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 5-12.
  • Covaliu Z., Oliver R.M. (1995), Representation and Solution of Decision Problems Using Sequential Decision Diagrams, "Management Science", Vol. 41, pp. 1860-1881.
  • Cox J.C., Ross S.A., Rubinstein M. (1979), Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach, "Journal of Financial Economics", Vol. 7, pp. 229-263.
  • Frini A., Guitouni A., Martel J.M. (2012), A General Decomposition Approach for Multicriteria Decision Trees, "European Journal of Operational Research", Vol. 220, pp. 452-460.
  • Frohwein H.I., Haimes Y.Y., Lambert J.H. (2000), Risk of Extreme Events in Multiobjective Decision Trees. Part 2: Rare Events, "Risk Analysis", Vol. 20, pp. 125-134.
  • Frohwein H.I., Lambert J.H. (2000), Risk of Extreme Events in Multiobjective Decision Trees. Part 1: Severe Events, "Risk Analysis", Vol. 20, pp. 113-123.
  • Granot D., Zuckerman D. (1991), Optimal Sequencing and Resource Allocation in Research and Development Projects, "Management Science", Vol. 37, pp. 140-156.
  • Guthrie G. (2009), Real Options in Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Hess S.W. (1993), Swinging on the Branch of a Tree: Project Selection Applications, "Interfaces", Vol. 23, pp. 5-12.
  • Haimes Y., Li D., Tulsiani V. (1990), Multiobjective Decision Tree Method, "Risk Analysis", Vol. 10, pp. 111-129.
  • Heidkamp C.P. (2008), A Theoretical Framework for a 'Spatially Conscious' Economic Analysis of Environmental Issues, "Geoforum", Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 62-75.
  • Keeney R.L., Raiffa H. (1976), Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.
  • Kirkwood C.W. (1993), An Algebraic Approach to Formulating and Solving Large Models for Sequential Decisions under Uncertainty, "Management Science", Vol. 39, pp. 900-913.
  • Lootsma F.A. (1997), Multicriteria Decision Analysis in a Decision Tree, "European Journal of Operational Research", Vol. 101, pp. 442-451.
  • Nowak M. (2006), INSDECM - an Interactive Procedure for Discrete Stochastic Multicriteria Decision Making Problems, "European Journal of Operational Research", Vol. 175, pp. 1413-1430.
  • Nowak M. (2013), An Interactive Procedure for Multiple Criteria Decision Tree [in:] A. Skulimowski (ed.), Looking into the Future of Creativity and Decision Support Systems, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems, Progress and Business Publishers, Kraków, pp. 461-472.
  • Nowak M. (2016), Solving a Multicriteria Decision Tree Problem Using Interactive Approach [in:] A.M.J. Skulimowski, J. Kacprzyk (eds.), Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems: Recent Trends, "Advances and Solutions. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing", No. 364, pp. 301-314.
  • Plottu E., Plottu B. (2012), Total Landscape Values: A Multi-Dimensional Approach, "Journal of Environmental Planning and Management", Vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 797-811.
  • Skulimowski A. (2014), Anticipatory Network Models of Multicriteria Decision-Making Processes, "International Journal of Systems Science", Vol. 45, pp. 39-59.
  • Targiel K.S. (2013a), Valuation of Investment Projects in the Context of Sustainable Development: Real Option Approach, 2013 World Congress on Sustainable Technologies (WCST) Proceedings, London, pp. 90-94.
  • Targiel K.S. (2013b), Multiple Criteria Decision Making in the Valuation of Real Options, "Multiple Criteria Decision Making", Vol. 8, pp. 129-142.
  • Targiel K.S. (2015), Real Options in a Systemic Approach to the Timing Problem in Development Projects, "Operations Research and Decisions", Vol. 25, pp. 73-85.
  • Winterfeld D. von, Edwards W. (1986), Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171487785

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.