PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | nr 478 Finanse i rachunkowość na rzecz zrównoważonego rozwoju - edukacja, etyka, innowacje. Finanse | 113--121
Tytuł artykułu

Motywy inwestowania społecznie odpowiedzialnego - przegląd wybranych badań

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Motives for Socially Responsible Investment - An Overview of Selected Research
Języki publikacji
PL
Abstrakty
Inwestycje społecznie odpowiedzialne definiowane są jako długoterminowa strategia inwestowania środków (osób fizycznych lub instytucji), która dąży zarówno do maksymalizacji zysku, jak i poprawy dobrobytu społecznego. Są one coraz szybciej rosnącym segmentem rynku finansowego. Rozpowszechnione w literaturze modele inwestora: model Markowitza i koncepcje behawioralne są niewystarczające, aby wyjaśnić skłonność inwestorów do lokowania środków w sposób społecznie odpowiedzialny. Celem artykułu jest identyfikacja i klasyfikacja motywów inwestowania społecznie odpowiedzialnego. Przyjętą metodą jest szeroka analiza literatury światowej. Uzyskane rezultaty wskazują, że wśród motywów inwestowania społecznie odpowiedzialnego dostrzega się motywy finansowe, inne motywy gospodarcze, motywy psychologiczne, etyczne, aksjologiczne, religijne, związane z budowaniem swojego wizerunku przez inwestora oraz chęcią oddziaływania na system społeczno-ekonomicznego. Potwierdza to niewystarczalność znanych modeli inwestora i inspiruje do dalszych badań interdyscyplinarnych koniecznych do predykcji zachowania inwestorów na rynkach kapitałowych(abstrakt oryginalny)
EN
Socially Responsible Investments (SRI) are defined as a long-term investment strategy of individual and institutional investors, aimed at both: financial return and social welfare. SRI are a fast growing segment of the capital market. Popular models of investors: Markowitz's model and behavioural concepts are not sufficient to explain the phenomena of SRI. The aim of this paper is to recognize and classify motives of investors to invest in socially responsible way. The method is the literature analysis. The results indicate that among motives for SRI there are financial and others: economic, psychological, ethical, axiological, religious, as well as ones connected with creating investor's image and with his/her willingnes to influence socio-economic system. The results show that most popular models for investors are insufficient and that interdisciplinary studies are necessary to predict investor's behaviour(original abstract)
Twórcy
autor
  • Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
  • Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
Bibliografia
  • Anand P., Cowton C.J., 1993, The ethical investor: Exploring dimensions of investment behaviour, Journal of Economic Psychology, no. 14 (2), s. 377-385.
  • Auer B.R., Schuhmacher F., 2016, Do socially (ir) responsible investments pay? New evidence from international ESG data, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, no. 59, s. 51-62.
  • Auger P., Burke P., Devinney T.M., Louviere J.J., 2003, What will consumers pay for social product features?, Journal of Business Ethics, no. 42 (3), s. 281-304.
  • Bauer R., Smeets P., 2015, Social identification and investment decisions, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, no. 117, s. 121-134.
  • Bauer R., Koedijk K., Otten R., 2005, International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style, Journal of Banking & Finance, no. 29 (7), s. 1751-1767.
  • Beal D., Goyen M., 1998, 'Putting your money where your mouth is' A profile of ethical investors, Financial Services Review, no. 7 (2), s. 129-143.
  • Beal D.J., Goyen M., Philips P., 2005, Why do we invest ethically?, The Journal of Investing, no. 14 (3), s. 66-78.
  • Bengtsson E., 2008, A history of Scandinavian socially responsible investing, Journal of Business Ethics, no. 82 (4), s. 969-983.
  • Borghesi R., Houston J.F., Naranjo A., 2014, Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests, Journal of Corporate Finance, no. 26, s. 164-181.
  • Capelle-Blancard G., Monjon S., 2012, Trends in the literature on socially responsible investment: looking for the keys under the lamppost, Business Ethics: A European Review, no. 21 (3), s. 239-250.
  • Cowton C.J., 1994, The development of ethical investment products, The ACT guide to ethical conflicts in finance, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
  • Derwall J., Koedijk K., Ter Horst J., 2011, A tale of values-driven and profit-seeking social investors, Journal of Banking & Finance, no. 35 (8), s. 2137-2147.
  • EuroSIF, 2016, European SRI Study, http://www.eurosif.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/SRI-study-2016-HR.pdf (10.04.2017).
  • Gambling T., Karim R.A.A., 1991, Business and accounting ethics in Islam, Mansell, London.
  • Glac K., 2009, Understanding socially responsible investing: The effect of decision frames and trade-off options, Journal of Business Ethics, no. 87, s. 41-55.
  • Gowdy J.M., 2004, Altruism, evolution, and welfare economics, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, no. 53 (1), s. 69-73.
  • Horodecka A., 2014, "Homo oeconomicus" jako podstawa ekonomii - krytyka i alternatywy, Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, nr 347, s. 166-183.
  • Jansson M., Biel A., 2014, Investment Institutions' Beliefs about and Attitudes toward Socially Responsible Investment (SRI): A Comparison Between SRI and Non-SRI Management, Sustainable Development, no. 22 (1), s. 33-41.
  • Jansson M., Biel A., 2011, Motives to engage in sustainable investment: a comparison between institutional and private investors, Sustainable Development, no. 19 (2), s. 135-142.
  • Jaufeerally R.Z., 2012, Islamic Banking and Responsible Investment: Is a Fusion Possible?, [w:] Responsible Investment in Times of Turmoil, Springer Netherlands, s. 151-163.
  • Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L., 1992, Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, no. 22 (1), s. 57-70.
  • Kagel J.H., Roth A.E. (eds.), 1997, Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Keynes J.M., 1936, General theory of employment, interest and money, Atlantic Publishers & Dist.
  • Kreander N., Gray R.H., Power D.M., Sinclair C.D., 2005, Evaluating the performance of ethical and non-ethical funds: a matched pair analysis, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, no. 32 (7-8), s. 1465-1493.
  • Lewis A., 2001, A focus group study of the motivation to invest: 'ethical/green' and 'ordinary' investors compared, Journal of Socio-Economics, no. 30, s. 331-341.
  • Lewis A., Juravle C., 2010, Morals, markets and sustainable investments: A qualitative study of 'champions', Journal of Business Ethics, no. 93 (3), s. 483-494.
  • Lewis A., Mackenzie C., 2000, Support for investor activism among UK ethical investors, Journal of Business Ethics, no. 24 (3), s. 215-222.
  • Lewis A., Webley P., 1994, Social and ethical investing, Ethics and Economic Affairs, s. 171-182.
  • Lodi-Smith J., Roberts B.W., 2007, Social investment and personality: A meta-analysis of the relationship of personality traits to investment in work, family, religion, and volunteerism, Personality and Social Psychology Review, no. 11 (1), s. 68-86.
  • Lu J.R., Chan C.M., 2012, Religious-based portfolio selection, Review of Financial Economics, no. 21 (1), s. 31-38.
  • Markowitz H., 1952, Portfolio selection, The Journal of Finance, no. 7 (1), s. 77-91.
  • McLachlan J., Gardner J., 2004, A comparison of socially responsible and conventional investors, Journal of Business Ethics, no. 52 (1), s. 11-25.
  • Michelson G., Wailes N., Van Der Laan S., Frost G., 2004, Ethical investment processes and outcomes, Journal of Business Ethics, no. 52 (1), s. 1-10.
  • Nilsson J., 2008, Investment with a conscience: Examining the impact of pro-social attitudes and perceived financial performance on socially responsible investment behavior, Journal of Business Ethics, no. 83 (2), s. 307-325.
  • Park H., 2005, The role of idealism and relativism as dispositional characteristics in the socially responsible decision-making process, Journal of Business Ethics, no. 56 (1), s. 81-98.
  • Pasewark W.R., Riley M.E., 2010, It's a matter of principle: The role of personal values in investment decisions, Journal of Business Ethics, no. 93 (2), s. 237-253.
  • Renneboog L., Ter Horst J., Zhang C., 2008, Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behaviour, Journal of Banking & Finance, no. 32 (9), s. 1723-1742.
  • Revelli C., 2016, Re-embedding financial stakes within ethical and social values in socially responsible investing (SRI), Research in International Business and Finance, no. 38, s. 1-5.
  • Richardson B.J., Cragg W., 2010, Being virtuous and prosperous: SRI's conflicting goals, Journal of Business Ethics, no. 92, s. 21-39.
  • Riedl A., Smeets P., 2014, Social preferences and portfolio choice, CESifo Working Paper, no. 4403, s. 1-50.
  • Scholtens B., Sievänen R., 2013, Drivers of socially responsible investing: A case study of four Nordic countries, Journal of Business Ethics, no. 115(3), s. 605-616.
  • Simon H.A., 1991, Bounded rationality and organizational learning, Organization science, no. 2 (1), s. 125-134.
  • Starr M.A., 2008, Socially responsible investment and pro-social change, Journal of Economic Issues, no. 42 (1), s. 51-73.
  • Statman M., 2004, What do investors want?, The Journal of Portfolio Management, 30 (5), 153-161.
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D., 1974, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Science, no. 185 (4157), s. 1124-1131.
  • Wins A., Zwergel B., 2016, Comparing those who do, might and will not invest in sustainable funds: a survey among German retail fund investors, Business Research, no. 9 (1), s. 51-99.
  • Wagemans F.A., Koppen C.K.V., Mol A.P., 2013, The effectiveness of socially responsible investment: A review, Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, no. 10 (3-4), s. 235-252.
  • Vyvyan V., Ng C., Brimble M., 2007, Socially responsible investing: The green attitudes and grey choices of Australian investors, Corporate Governance: An International Review, no. 15 (2), s. 370-381.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171488197

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.