Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | 10 | nr 4 | 9--36
Tytuł artykułu

Quantitative Indicators for Social Sustainability Assessment of Society and Product Responsibility Aspects in Supply Chains

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Increased pressures from stakeholders have been forcing companies to integrate social sustainability into their businesses. However, lack of information leads to gaps in social sustainability, some of them being also related to difficulties in social sustainability assessment of supply chains often caused by lack of appropriate quantitative indicators to be used. The aim of this paper is, thus, to fill this gap by proposing a set of quantitative social sustainability indicators applicable to various types of supply chains. The indicators proposed here address the most frequently encountered issues of social sustainability. The research resulted in the identification of 24 generic quantitative indicators suitable for the assessment of a supply chain, particularly related to society and product responsibility issues. The indicators are validated through content analysis of 141 sustainability reports from all echelons (upstream, midstream, downstream) of a supply chain. Beyond that, one-way statistical analysis (ANOVA) is performed in order to analyse how echelon levels affect the relevance of these indicators. Content analysis results confirm that issues covered by the indicators are addressed by the companies in their sustainability reports, while ANOVA analysis shows that supply chain echelon level does not influence the relevance of the indicators, making this set of indicators generic and applicable to any supply chain. Therefore, these indicators can be considered as generic and used for the holistic assessment of supply chains. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • School of Business and Management, Lappeenranta University of Technology , Finland
  • School of Business and Management, Lappeenranta University of Technology , Finland; Technical University of Lodz, Poland
  • University of Lisbon, Portugal
  • University of Lisbon, Portugal
  • Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2015). An analysis of metrics used to measure performance in green and sustainable supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 360-377. doi:
  • Ali, H. A. E. M., Al-Sulaihi, I. A., & Al-Gahtani, K. S. (2013). Indicators for measuring performance of building constructions companies in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 25, 125-134. doi:
  • Azapagic, A., & Predan, S. (2000). Indicators of sustainable development for industry: A general framework. Trans IChemE, 78(B), 243-261. doi:
  • Azcárate, F., Carrasco, F., & Fernández, M. (2011). The role of integrated indicators in exhibiting business contribution to sustainable development: a survey of sustainability reporting initiatives. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 14, 213-240. doi:
  • Beske-Janssen, P., Johnson, M. P., & Schaltegger, S. (2015). 20 years of performance measurement in sustainable supply chain management - what has been achieved? Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(6), 664-680. doi:
  • Bewick, V., L. Cheek, L., & Ball, J. (2004). Statistics review 9: One-way analysis of variance. Critical Care, 8 (2), 130- 136. doi:
  • Borit, M., & Santos, J. (2015). Getting traceability rights, from fish to advanced bio-technological products: a review of legislation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 104, 13-22. doi:
  • Feng, S.C., & Joung, C.B. (2009). An overview of proposed measurement infrastructure for sustainable manufacturing. The 7th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, December 2 - 4, 2009, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India, available at: (accessed 11.10.2016).
  • Ferriss, A.L. (2010). Social Indicators Research Series 42: Approaches to Improving the Quality of Life. How to Enhance the Quality of Life. Springer, NY, USA. doi:
  • Flick, U. (2014). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, CA, USA.
  • Fritz, M.M.C., Schöggl, J. -P., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2017). Selected sustainability aspects for supply chain data exchange: Towards a supply chain-wide sustainability assessment. Journal ofCleaner Production, 141, 587-607. doi:
  • Garcia, S., Y. Cintra, Y., Torres, R. de C. S. R., & Lima, F. G. (2016). Corporate sustainability management: a proposed multi-criteria model to support balanced decision-making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136(A), 181-196. doi:
  • GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2011). Sustainability reporting guidelines. Amsterdam. The Netherlands.
  • Hák, T., S. Janoušková, S., & Bedřich, M. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565-573. doi:
  • Hardoon, D., & Heinrich, F. (2011). Bribe payers index. Transparency International, available at: (accessed 15.01.2017)
  • Hassini, E., Surti, C., & Searcy, C. (2012). A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. Int. J. Production Economics, 140, 69-82. doi:
  • Hsien, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. doi:
  • Hutchins, M. J., & Sutherland, J. W. (2008). An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1688-1698. doi:
  • Irawanto, D.W. (2015). Employee participation in decision-making: evidence from a state-owned enterprise in Indonesia. Management, 20(1), 159-172.
  • Kasemsap, K. (2016). Encouraging supply chain networks and customer loyalty in global supply chain. In Handbook of Research on Strategic Supply Chain Management in Retail Industry, edited by N. Kamath, N., & S. Saurav, S. IGI Golbal, US. doi:
  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411-433. doi:
  • Labuschagne, C., Brent, A. C., & van Erck, R. P. G. (2005). Assessing the sustainability performances of industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 373-385. doi:
  • Lodhia, S., & Martin, N. (2014). Corporate sustainability indicators: and Australian mining case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 107-115. doi:
  • Mani, V., Agrawal, R., & Sharma, V. (2014). Supplier selection using social sustainability: AHP based approach in India. International Strategic Management Review, 2, 98-112. doi:
  • Mani, V., Agrawal, R., & Sharma, V. (2015). Social sustainability in the supply chain: analysis of enablers. Management Research Review, 38(9), 1016-1042. doi:
  • Mani, V., Agrawal, R., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., & Childe S. J. (2016). Social sustainability in the supply chain: Construct development and measurement validation. Ecological Indicators, 71, 270-279. doi:
  • Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Hazan, B., & Dubey, R. (2016). Supply chain social sustainability for developing nations: Evidence from India. Resources. Conservations and Recycling, 111, 42-52. doi:
  • Martínez, J. C. V., & Fransoo, J. C. (2017). Green Facility Location. In Sustainable Supply Chains. A Research-Based Textbook on Operations and Strategy, edited by Y. Bouchery et al. Springer International Publishing. doi:
  • Meckenstock, J., Barbosa-Póvoa, A. P., & Carvalho, A. (2015). The wicked character of sustainable supply chain management: evidence from sustainability reports. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25 (7), 449-477. doi:
  • Mehralian, G., Rasekh, H.R., Akhavan, P., & Ghatari, A. R. (2013). Prioritization of intellectual capital indicators in knowledge-based industries: Evidence from pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Information Management, 33, 209-216. doi:
  • Missimer, M., Robèrt, K. -H., & G. Broman, G. (2017). A strategic approach to social sustainability - Part 2: a principle- based definition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140(1), 42-52. doi:
  • Omri, A. E. (2009). Cooperation in supply chains: alliance formation and profit allocation among independent firms. Business administration, Ecole Centrale Paris, France.
  • Popovic, T., & Kraslawski, A. (2015). Chapter 6: Social sustainability of complex systems. In: You, F. (Ed.) Sustainability of Products, Processes and Supply Chains. Theory and Applications: Elsevier. doi:
  • Potter, J. W. & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 258-284. doi:
  • Prasad, B.D. (2008). Content analysis. A method in social science research. In Research methods for Social Work, edited by D. K. Lal Das, D.K., and &V. Bhaskaran, V. New Delhi, Rawat.
  • Rahdary, A. H., & Rostamy, A. A. A. (2015). Designing a general set of sustainability indicators at the corporate level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 757-771. doi:
  • Rametsteiner, E., Pülzl, H., J. Alkan-Olsson, J., & Frederiksen, P. (2011). Sustainability indicator development - Science or political negotiation? Ecological Indicators, 11, 61-70. doi:
  • Simões, M., Freitas, C. L., Barbosa-Póvoa, A. P., & Carvalho, A. (2016). Social Life Cycle Assessment- A framework for mid- and end-point impact categories. Working-paper
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.