Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | 3 | nr 1 | 103--110
Tytuł artykułu

Sustainable Landscape Management Based on Cultural Ecosystem Services

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
To sustain cultural ecosystem services and cultural heritage it is important to go in depth in the science policy interface, because efficient governance mechanisms emerge from the cooperation of scientists and practitioners. In the Basque Country, we are on the road towards adaptive and resilient landscape management through an integrative approach that enhances the link between science, policy-making and society. Key elements of this approach are: The establishment from the outset of a transdisciplinary community of practice; the creation of specific transdisciplinar working groups to go in depth with concrete applicability measures; a strong outreach strategy and educational programs development; and last but not least, the involvement of stakeholders at multiple stage of the process. Diverse research lines are carried out during the process (e.g. mapping ecosystems services, analyzing social perceptions), whose results are combined to help identify response options for sustainable landscape. Relevant policy implementations of the results of this broad research are already taking place in the Basque Country. The proved utility of this working mechanism makes key agents to continue involved, and to attract more agents into the process. These transdisciplinary processes facilitate the creation of synergies and win-win solutions towards sustainable management of cultural ecosystem services. (original abstract)
Słowa kluczowe
Opis fizyczny
  • University of the Basque Country, Spain
  • University of the Basque Country, Spain
  • University of the Basque Country, Spain
  • University of the Basque Country, Spain
  • University of the Basque Country, Spain
  • Clark W.C., Dickson N.M., Sustainability science: The emerging research program, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2003, 100 (14), 8059-8061.
  • Rogers K.H., The real river management challenge: Integrating scientists, stakeholders and service agencies, River Res Appl, 2006, 22 (2), 269-280.
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA), Ecosystems and human wellbeing: a synthesis report, Island Press, Washington, DC, 2005.
  • Rands M.R.W., Adams W.M., Bennun L., Butchart SHM, Clements A., Coomes D., et al., Biodiversity Conservation: Challenges Beyond 2010, Science, 2010, 239, 1298-1303.
  • Albert C., Aronson J., Fürst C., Opdam P., Integrating ecosystem services in landscape planning: Requirements, approaches, and impacts, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29 (8), 1277-1285.
  • Anton C., Young J., Harrison P.A., Musche M., Bela G., Feld C.K., et al., Research needs for incorporating the ecosystem service approach into EU biodiversity conservation policy, Biodivers. Conserv., 2010, 19, 2979-2994.
  • De Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L., Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making, Ecol. Complex., 2010, 7, 260-272.
  • Fürst C., Opdam P., Inostroza L., Learning about the role of ecosystem services in participatory land use planning: proposing a balanced score card, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 42, 10-19.
  • Brunckhorst D., Coop P., Reve I., 'Eco-civic' optimisation: a nested framework for planning and managing landscapes, Landsc Urban Plan, 2006, 75 (3-4), 265-281.
  • Termorshuizen J.W., Opdam P., Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development, Landsc. Ecol., 2009, 24, 1037-1052.
  • Onaindia M., Madariaga I., Palacios I., Arana, X. (Eds.), Nature and human well-being in Biscay. Ecosystem services assessment; research applied to management, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) press, Leioa, Spain, 2015,
  • Palacios-Agundez I., Fernández de Manuel B., Rodríguez-Loinaz G., Peña, L., Ametzaga-Arregi, I., G. Alday, J., et al., Integrating stakeholders' demands and scientific knowledge on ecosystem services in landscape planning, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29, 1423-1433.
  • Viglizzo E.F., Paruelo J.M., Laterra P., Jobbágy E.G., Ecosystem service evaluation to support land-use policy, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2012, 154, 78-84.
  • Nieto-Romero M., Oteros-Rozas E., González J.A, Martín-López B., Exploring the knowledge landscape of ecosystem services assessments in Mediterranean agroecosystems: Insights for future research, Environ. Sci. Policy, 2014, 37, 121-133.
  • Jacobs S., Spanhove T., De Smet L., Van Daele T., Van Reeth W., Van Gossum P., et al., The ecosystem service assessment challenge: Reflections from Flanders-REA, Ecol Indic, 2016, 61, 715-727.
  • Palacios-Agundez I., Onaindia M., Barraqueta P., Madariaga I., Provisioning ecosystem services supply and demand: The role of landscape management to reinforce supply and promote synergies with other ecosystem services, Land Use Policy, 2015, 47, 145-155.
  • Rodríguez-Loinaz G., Alday J.G., Onaindia M., Multiple ecosystem services landscape index: a tool for multifunctional landscapes conservation. J Environ Manage, 2015, 147, 152-163.
  • Onaindia M., Fernández de Manuel B., Madariaga I., Rodríguez-Loinaz G., Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, the carbon store and water flow regulations. For Ecol Manage, 2013, 289, 1-9.
  • Peña L., Monge-Ganuzas M., Onaindia M., Fernández de Manuel B., Mendia M, A holistic approach including biological and geological criteria for integrative management in protected areas, J Environ Manage, 2017, 59 (2), 325-337.
  • Casado-Arzuaga I., Onaindia M., Madariaga I., Verburg P.H., Mapping recreation and aesthetic value of ecosystems in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt (northern Spain) to support landscape planning, Landsc Ecol, 2014, 29, 1393-1405.
  • Peña L., Casado-Arzuaga I, Onaindia M., Mapping recreation supply and demand using an ecological and a social evaluation approach, Ecosystem Services, 2015, 13, 108-118.
  • Martín-López B., Iniesta-Arandia I., García-Llorente M., Palomo I., Casado-Arzuaga I., García del Amo D., et al., Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences, PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(6): e3897.
  • Casado-Arzuaga I., Madariaga I., Onaindia M., Perception, demand and user contribution to ecosystem services in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt, J Environ Manage, 2013, 129, 33-43.
  • Onaindia M, Ballesteros F., Alonso G., Monge-Ganuzas M., Peña L, Participatory process to prioritize actions for a sustainable management in a biosphere reserve, Environ. Sci. Policy, 2013, 33, 283-294.
  • Palacios-Agundez I., Casado-Arzuaga I., Madariaga I., Onaindia M. The Relevance of Local Participatory Scenario Planning for Ecosystem Management Policies in the Basque Country, Northern Spain, Ecol. Soc., 2013, 18 (3), 7.
  • Rodríguez-Loinaz G., Ametzaga I., Onaindia M., Use of native species to improve carbon sequestration and contribute towards solving the environmental problems of the timberlands in Biscay, northern Spain. J Environ Manage, 2013, 120, 18-26.
  • Palacios-Agundez I., Onaindia M., Potschin M., Tratalos J.A., Madariaga I., Haines-Young R., Relevance for decision making of spatially explicit, participatory scenarios for ecosystem services in an area of a high current demand, Environ. Sci. Policy, 2015, 54, 199-209.
  • Mairota P., Cafarelli B., Boccaccio L., Leronni V., Labadessa R., Kosmidou V., et al., Using landscape structure to develop quantitative baselines for protected area monitoring, Ecol Indic, 2013, 33, 82-95.
  • Castro A.J., García-Llorente M., Martín-López B., Palomo I., Iniesta-Arandia I., Multidimensional approaches in ecosystem services assessment, in: Alcaraz-Segura D., Marcelo Di Bella C., Veronica Straschnoy J. (Eds.), Earth Observation of Ecosystem Services, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2013.
  • Wenger E., McDermott R., Snyder W.M., Cultivating Communities of Practice, 1st ed., Harvard Business Press, 2002.
  • Lesser L.E., Storck J., Communities of Practice and organizational performance, IBM Systems Journal, 2001, 40, 4.
  • Haines-Young R., Potschin M., The ecosystem approach as a framework for understanding knowledge utilization, Environ. Plan. C: Gov. Policy, 2014, 32 (2), 301-319.
  • Barredo J.I., Bastrup-Birk A., Teller A., Onaindia M., Fernández de Manuel B., Madariaga I., et al., Mapping and assessment of forest ecosystems and their services -Applications and guidance for decision making in the framework of MAES, EUR 27751 EN, 2015, DOI: 10.2788/720519.
  • Henrich T., Zurek M., Eickhout B., Kok K., Raudsepp- Hearne C., Ribeiro T., et al., Scenario development and analysis for forward-looking ecosystem assessments. In: Ash N., Blanco H., Brown C., Garcia K., Henrichs T., Lucas, N., et al. (Eds.), Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Manual for Assessment Practitioners, Island, Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
  • Jacobs S., Dendoncker N., Keune H., Editorial: No Root, no Fruit - Sustainability and Ecosystem Services. In: Ecosystem Services: Global Issues, LocalPractices. Elsevier, New York, 2013.
  • Opdam P., Albert C., Grêt-Regamey A., Kleemann J., La Rosa D., Parker D., et al., Ecosystem services for connecting actors - lessons learnt from discussion, Change Adaptation Socioecol. Syst, 2015, 2, 1-7.
  • Hauck J., Albert C., Fürs, C., Geneletti D., La Rosa D., Lorz C., Spyra, M., Developing and Applying Ecosystem Service Indicators in Decision-Support at Various Scales, Ecol Indic, 2016, 61, 1-5.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.