Social Responsibility in Business Philosophy : a Trend for the Sustainability of Family Agribusiness

• Autorzy: María de los Ángeles Cervantes Rosas , Myrna Delfina López Noriega , Lorena Zalthen Hernández
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Today, companies regardless of their size, have expressed concern the environmental and social issues. To do this, they have been incorporating social responsibility practices; However, these practices are not always aligned objectives organizational or included in its business philosophy. Therefore, we carry out this research to analyze the evolution experienced by family agribusinesses to incorporate the actions of CSR as part of their philosophy. Use of the study case of qualitative methodology and through interviews and documentary analysis was collected information; to process it was found that companies have to go not only adapting their philosophy but their goals, code of ethics and organizational structure in order to flow information relating to incorporated practices. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Family-owned business; Strategic management; Sustainable development

PL

Przedsiębiorstwo rodzinne; Zarządzanie strategiczne; Rozwój zrównoważony

• Czasopismo: Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie
• Rocznik: 2017
• Numer: t. 18, z. 6, cz. 1 Firmy rodzinne - rozwój teorii i praktyki zarządzania
• Strony: 225--239

Twórcy

autor

María de los Ángeles Cervantes Rosas

• Universidad de Occidente

autor

Myrna Delfina López Noriega

• Autónoma del Carmen

autor

Lorena Zalthen Hernández

• Autónoma del Carmen

Bibliografia

• Abreu J.L. y Badii. M. (2007), Analisis del Concepto de Responsabilidad Social Empresarial, "Daena, International Journal of Good Conscience", pp. 54-70.
• Ackerman R.W. (1973), How companies respond to social demands, "Harvard University Review", 51(4): 88-98.
• Alford H. y Naugthon M. (2002), Beyond the shareholder model of the firm: Working toward the common good of a business [in] S.A. Cortright and M. Naugthon (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the catholic social tradition, 27-47, Notre Dame University Press, Notre Dame.
• Andriof J. y McIntosh M. (eds.) (2001), Perspectives on corporate citizenship, Greenleaf, Sheffield.
• Belausteguigoitia I. (s/f), Empresas familiares y responsabilidad social en Mexico, el 18 de Marzo de 2016. Recuperado:http://cedef.itam.mx/sites/default/files/u489/empresasfamiliaresyresponsabilidad_socialenmexico.pdf.
• Calvo C. (2000), Las diferentes teorias que sustentan la responsabilidad social de la empresa: estado de situacion y prospectiva, Ciencia y Tecnica Administrativa CyTA, ejournal Tecnica Administrativa, CRISESUQAM Universite du Quebec a Montreal, Canada.
• Coronado R. Semei (2007), Metodologia para la Pyme manufacturera [en] La Pyme en Mexico, Situacion actual y retos estrategicos, Universidad de Guadalajara, Mexico.
• Carroll A.B. (1979), A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance, "Academy of Management Review", 4, p. 497-505.
• Carroll A.B. (1999), Corporate Social Responsibility. Evolution of a Definitional Construct, "Business and Society", 38 (3), 268-295.
• Cervantes M. Izaguirre, F. y De Anda R. (2013), .Pymes familiares o no familiares? Estudio exploratorio en Mexico, Publicado en Memorias del XI Congreso Internacional de Analisis Organizacional, Universidad EAFIT, Colombia.
• Clark J.M. (1916), The changing basis of economic responsibility, "Journal of Political Economy", Vol. 24, pp. 209-229.
• Dahlsrud A. (2008), How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions, "Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management", 15, 1-13.
• Davis K. (1960), Can business afford to ignore corporate social responsibilities?, "California Management Review", 2: 70-76.
• Davis K. (1967), Understanding the social responsibility puzzle, "Business Horizons", 10(4): 45-5.
• De la Cuesta M. (2004), El porque de la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa [en] Boletin Economico de ICE, N° 2813, p. 45-58.
• De la Cuesta M. et al (2002), Inversiones eticas en empresas socialmente responsables. Madrid: UNED, Universidad Nacional De Educacion A Distancia, UNED.
• Donaldson T. y Preston L.E. (1995), The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications, "Academy of Management Review", 20(1), pp. 65-91.
• Donaldson, T., y Dunfee, T (1994). Towards a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review. 19: 252-284.
• Donaldson T. y Dunfee T. (1999), Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
• Drucker P. (1984), The New Meaning or Corporate Social Responsibility, "California Management Review", 26(2), 53-63.
• Fisher J. (2004), Social Responsibility and Ethics: Clarifying the Concepts, "Journal of Business Ethics", Dordrecht: Jul 2004. Vol. 52, Iss. 4; pag. 381.
• Freeman R. (1984), Strategic Management: a Stakeholders Approach, Pitman, Boston MA.
• Freeman R. (1994), The Politics of Stakeholder Theory, "Business Ethics Quarterly", 4(4): 409-421.
• Freeman R. y Phillips R. (2002), Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defence, Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(3): 331-349.
• Friedman M. (1970), The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits, "The New York Times Magazine", September 13th, 32-33, 122, 126.
• Garcia-Chiang A. (2008), La Responsabilidad Social Empresarial en la industria petrolera. Petroleos Mexicanos y las empresas en la Sonda de Campeche. Mexico, "Revista Equilibrio Economico".
• Garcia-Chiang A. y Rodriguez J. (2008), Responsabilidad Social en la empresa. La region Marina Noreste de PEMEX Exploracion y Produccion, Mexico, "Revista Equilibrio Economico".
• Garriga E. y Mele D. (2004), Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory, "Journal of Business Ethics", 1-2 53, pp. 52-71.
• Garza A. (2007), Proceso de administracion estrategica y creacion de la estrategia [en] Gestion Estrategica, pp.1-20.
• Gersick D., Mccollom M. y Lansberg I. (1997), Empresas familiares. Generacion a generacion, McGraw-Hill Interamericana Editores.
• Gladwin T. y Kennelly J. (1995), Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research, "Academy of Management Review", 20(4): 874-904.
• Glotzer J. (2013), Componentes fundamentales de las teorias sobre la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial, "Revista Sinergia". Consultado en linea el 2 de octubre 2015, en: http://revista-sinergia.com.ar/wp/?p=545