PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | 11 | nr 1 | 91--105
Tytuł artykułu

Improving Value-at-Risk Estimation from the Normal EGARCH Model

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Returns in financial assets display consistent excess kurtosis and skewness, implying the presence of large fluctuations not forecasted by Gaussian models. This paper applies a resampling method based on the bootstrap and a bias-correction step to improve Value-at-Risk (VaR) forecasting ability of the n-EGARCH (normal EGARCH) model and correct the VaR for both long and short positions. Our aim is to utilize the advantages of this model, but still use the bootstrap resampling method to accurate for the tendency of the model tomiscalculate the VaR. Empirical results indicate that the bias-correction method can improve the n-GARCH and n-EGARCH VaR forecasts so much that the acquired VaR predictions are different from the proposed probability. Additionally, allowing asymmetry in the conditional variance using the EGARCH model with normal distribution instead of GARCH improves the performance of the bias-correction method in forecasting the VaR for almost all considered indices. Moreover, the bias-corrected n-EGARCH model performs better than the simple t-EGARCH model. Thus, it seems that this model can take account of both the asymmetry in the conditional variance and leptokurtosis in returns distribution. However, we find that the superiority of the bias-corrected n-EGARCH model over the t-EGARCH model is not completely confirmed for short positions based on the censored likelihood scoring rule. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
11
Numer
Strony
91--105
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
  • University of Raja, Iran
  • University of Essex, United Kingdom
Bibliografia
  • Alexander C. (2001). Market models: A guide to financial data analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Bams D., Lehnert T., & Wolff C.C.P. (2005). An evaluation framework for alternative VaR-models. Journal of International Money and Finance, 24(6), 944-958.
  • Bao Y., Lee T.H., & Saltoğlu B. (2007). Comparing density forecast models. Journal of Forecasting, 26(3), 203-225.
  • Barone-Adesi G., Giannopoulos K., & Vosper L. (1999). VaR without correlations for portfolios of derivative securities. Journal of Futures Markets, 19(5), 583-602.
  • Barone-Adesi G., Giannopoulos K., & Vosper L. (2002). Backtesting derivative portfolios with filtered historical simulation (fhs). European Financial Management, 8(1), 31-58.
  • Basle Committee on Banking Supervision. (1995). An internal model-based approach to market risk capital requirements. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbsc224.pdf
  • Basle Committee on Banking Supervision. (1996). Overview of the amendment to the capital accord to incorporate market risks. Retrieved from http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs23.pdf
  • Black F. (1976). Studies in Stock Price Volatility Changes. In Proceedings of the 1976 Business Meeting of the Business and Economic Statistics Section (pp. 177-181). Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.
  • Bollerslev T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327.
  • Bollerslev T., & Mikkelsen H.O. (1996). Modeling and pricing long memory in stock market volatility. Journal of Econometrics, 73, 151-184.
  • Brooks R.D., Faff R.W., McKenzie M.D. & Mitchell H. (2000). A multi-country study of power ARCH models and national stock market returns. Journal of International Money and Finance, 19(3), 377-397.
  • Christoffersen P.F. (1998). Evaluating intervals forecasts. International Economic Review 39(4), 841-862.
  • Christoffersen P., & Gonçalves S. (2005). Estimation risk in financial risk management. Journal of Risk, 7, 1-28.
  • Crouhy M., Galai D., & Mark R. (2001). Risk management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Diks C., Panchenko V., & van Dijk D. (2011). Likelihood-based scoring rules for comparing density forecasts in tails. Journal of Econometrics, 163(2), 215-230.
  • Ding Z., Granger C.W.J., & Engle R.F. (1993). A long memory property of stock market returns and a new model. Journal of Empirical Finance, 1(1), 83-106.
  • Dowd K. (2005). Measuring market risk (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & sons, Ltd.
  • Engle R.F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987-1008.
  • Engle R.F., & Ng V. (1993). Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility. The Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1749-1778.
  • Fama E.F. (1965). The behavior of stock market price. Journal of Business, 38(1), 34-105.
  • Giot P., & Laurent S. (2003). Value-at-risk for long and short trading positions. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(6), 641-663.
  • Glosten L.R., Jagannathan R., & Runkle D.E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. The Journal of Finance, 5(48), 1779-1801.
  • Hartz C.‚ Mittnik S.‚ & Paolella M. (2006). Accurate value-at-risk forecasting based on the normal-GARCH model. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51(4), 2295-2312.
  • Kupiec P.H. (1995). Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models. The Journal of Derivatives, 3(2), 73-84.
  • Loudon G.F., Watt W.H., & Yadav P.K. (2000). An empirical analysis of alternative parametric ARCH model. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15(2), 117-136.
  • Nelson D.B. (1991). Conditional heteroscedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59(2), 347-370.
  • Nieto M.R., & Ruiz E. (2010). Bootstrap prediction intervals for VaR and ES in the context of GARCH models (Working Paper No. 10-28). Departamento de Estadística, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Retrieved from http://earchivo.uc3m.es/bitstream/handle/10016/8524/ws102814.pdf?sequence=1
  • Pascual L., Romo J., & Ruiz E. (2006). Bootstrap prediction for returns and volatilities in GARCH models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 50(9), 2293-2312.
  • Reeves J. (2005). Bootstrap prediction intervals for ARCH models. International Journal of Forecasting, 21(2), 237-248.
  • Trucíos C., & Hotta L. (2016). Bootstrap prediction in univariate volatility models with leverage effect. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 120, 91-103.
  • Tsay R.S. (2005). Analysis of financial time series. New Jersey, NJ: A John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171499994

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.