Expressed Turnover Intention: Alternate Method for Knowing Turnover Intention and Eradicating Common Method Bias

• Autorzy: Ghulam Abid , Tahira Hassan Butt
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Employees are the building blocks and valuable assets in an organization. Organizational researchers and practitioners have shown a burgeoning attention to satisfy and retain key performer as the cost of leaving a job is very high for the employing organizations. Discovering turnover intention in its formation stages is very crucial, not only to resist its' piled up effect but also to control the actual turnover in the future. Most of the times, management is not aware of the employee's quit intention because employees don't show their intention explicitly until they actually leave the organization. However, majority of the times employees share their feeling with their colleagues or other close work mates. Based on positive relationship at work, we argued that the individuals who work together normally share their feelings with their close colleagues regarding their decision of leaving or staying (expressed turnover intention) with the current employer. Therefore, the objective of the current study is to investigate the relationship between turnover intention and expressed turnover intention. Furthermore, we offer a new perspective to data collection from other sources, which will assist us in shortening the questionnaire, also minimizing the common method bias and knowing the quit intention from other source. Finally, theoretical and practical implications along with direction for future studies are also discussed. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Employees in the organization; Employees' recruitment

PL

Pracownicy w organizacji; Dobór pracowników

• Czasopismo: International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences (ILSHS)
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 78
• Strony: 18--26

Twórcy

autor

Ghulam Abid

• National College of Business Administration & Economics, Lahore, Pakistan

autor

Tahira Hassan Butt

• National College of Business Administration & Economics, Lahore, Pakistan

Bibliografia

• Adams J.S., Inequity in social exchange, in: L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, 1965, pp. 267-299.
• Amabile T., Kramer S., Valuing your most valuable assets. Harvard Business Review. 2011. Available: https://hbr.org/2011/10/valuing-your-most-valuable.
• Barak M.E.M. et al., Why do they leave? Modeling child welfare workers` turnover intentions, Children and Youth Services Review. 28(5) (2006) 548-577.
• Berry M.L., Predicting turnover intent: examining the effects of employee engagement, compensation fairness, job satisfaction, and age, Ph.D dissertation, University of Tennessee, 2010. Available: http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/678.
• Bilgili T. et al., Gone with the wind: a meta-analytic review of executive turnover, its antecedents, and postacquisition performance, Journal of Management. 43(6) (2016) 1966- 1997.
• Buckley R., Wheeler A., Halbesleben J., Research in personnel and human resources management, Emerald, United Kingdom, 2015.
• Campbell D.T., Fiske D.W., Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix, Psychological Bulletin. 56(2) (1959) 81-105.
• Carmeli A., Weisberg J., Exploring turnover intentions among three professional groups of employees, Human Resource Development International. 9(2) (2006) 191-206.
• Cho Y.J., Lewis G.B., Turnover intention and turnover behavior: implications for retaining federal employees, Review of Public Personnel Administration. 32(1) (2012) 4-23.
• Cohen G., Blake R.S., Goodman D., Does turnover intention matter? Evaluating the usefulness of turnover intention rate as a predictor of actual turnover rate, Review of Public Personnel Administration. 36(3) (2016) 240-263.
• Conway J.M., Lance C.E., What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research, Journal of Business and Psychology. 25(3) (2010) 325-334.
• Cote J.A., Buckley M.R., Estimating trait, method, and error variance: Generalizing across 70 construct validation studies, Journal of Marketing Research. 24(3) (1987) 315-318.
• Cote J.A., Buckley M.R., Measurement error and theory testing in consumer research: an illustration of the importance of construct validation, Journal of Consumer Research. 14(4) (1988) 579-582.
• Crow M.S., Lee C.B., Joo J.J., Organizational justice and organizational commitment among South Korean police officers: an investigation of job satisfaction as a mediator, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management. 35(2) (2012) 402-423.
• De Gieter S. et al., Pay-level satisfaction and psychological reward satisfaction as mediators of the organizational justice-turnover intention relationship, International Studies of Management & Organization. 42(1) (2012) 50-67.
• Donaldson S.I., Grant-Vallone E.J., Understanding self-report bias in organizational behavior research, Journal of Business and Psychology. 17(2) (2002) 245-260.
• Elangovan A.R., Causal ordering of stress, satisfaction, and commitment, and intentions to quit: a structural equation analysis, Leadership and Organizational Development Journal. 22(4) (2001) 159-165.
• Emberland J.S., T. Rundmo, Implications of job insecurity perceptions and job insecurity responses for psychological well-being, turnover intentions and reported risk behavior, Safety Science. 48(4) (2010) 452-459.
• Frank F.D., Finnegan R.P., Taylor C.R., The race for talent: retaining and engaging workers in the 21st century, People and Strategy. 27(3) (2004) 12-25.
• Fuller C.M. et al., Common methods variance detection in business research, Journal of Business Research. 69(8) (2016) 3192-3198.
• Griffeth R.W., Hom P.W., Gaertner S., A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium, Journal of Management. 26(3) (2000) 463-488.
• Hancock J.I. et al., Meta-analytic review of employee turnover as a predictor of firm performance, Journal of Management. 39(3) (2013) 573-603.
• Hausknecht J.P., Trevor C.O., Collective turnover at the group, unit, and organizational levels: evidence, issues, and implications, Journal of Management. 37(1) (2011) 352-388.
• Hom P. et al., Reviewing employee turnover: focusing on proximal withdrawal states and an expanded criterion, Psychological Bulletin. 138(5) (2012) 831-858.
• Li J., Kim W., Zhao X., Multilevel model of management support and casino employee turnover intention, Tourism Management. 59 (2017) 193-204.
• Lindell M.K., Whitney D.J., Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs, Journal of Applied Psychology. 86(1) (2001) 114-121.
• Malhotra N.K., Kim S.S., Patil A., Common method variance in IS research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research, Management Science. 52(12) (2006) 1865-1883.
• Malhotra N.K., Schaller T.K., Patil A., Common method variance in advertising research: when to be concerned and how to control for it, Journal of Advertising. 46(1) (2017) 193-212.
• Matz A.K., Woo Y., Kim B., A meta analysis of the correlates of turnover intent in criminal justice organizations: does agency type matter?, Journal of Criminal Justice. 42(3) (2014) 233-243.
• Mitchell T.R. et al., Why people stay, using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover, Academy of Management Journal. 44(6) (2001) 1102-1122.
• Mobley W.H., Horner S.O., Hollingsworth A.T., An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover, Journal of Applied Psychology. 63(4) (1978) 408-414.
• Ongori H., A review of the literature on employee turnover, African Journal of Business Management. 1(3) (2007) 049-054.
• Podsakoff P.M. et al., Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(5) (2003) 879-903.
• Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Podsakoff N.P., Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it, Annual Review of Psychology. 63 (2012) 539-569.
• Podsakoff P.M., Organ D.W., Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects, Journal of Management. 12(4) (1986) 531-544.
• Poon J.M., Distributive justice, procedural justice, affective commitment, and turnover intention: a mediation-moderation framework, Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 42(6) (2012) 1505-1532.
• Price J.I., Reflections on the determinants of voluntary turnover, International Journal of Manpower. 22(7) (2001) 624-660.
• Rai G.S., Turnover intention among long-term care staff: three possible culprits, International Journal of Business and Social Science. 6(8) (2015) 1-9.
• Rizwan M. et al., Variables that have an impact on employee satisfaction and turnover intention, International Journal of Research in Commerce, Economics and Management. 3(3) (2013) 131-138.
• Siers A., Relationships among organisational justice perceptions, adjustment, and turnover of United States based expatriates, Applied Psychology. 56(3) (2007) 437-459.
• Smyth R., Zhai Q., Li X., Determinants of turnover intentions among Chinese off farm migrants, Economic Change and Restructuring. 42(3) (2009) 189-209.
• Takase M., A concept analysis of turnover intention: implications for nursing management, Collegian. 17(1) (2010) 3-12.
• Tanova C., Holtom B.C., Using job embeddedness factors to explain voluntary turnover in four european countries, The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 19(9) (2008) 1553-1568.
• Yin-Fah B.C. et al., An exploratory study on turnover intention among private sector employees, International Journal of Business and Management. 5(8) (2010) 57-64.
• Zhao H.A.O. et al., The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: a meta-analysis, Personnel Psychology. 60(3) (2007) 647-680.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.78.18