Validation of Task-Centric Holistic Agile Approach on Teaching Cyber Physical Systems Engineering

• Autorzy: Elena Mäkiö-Marusik , Juho Mäkiö , Jolanta Kowal

Warianty tytułu

Nauczanie cyber fizycznych systemów inżynieryjnych - walidacja holistycznego podejścia krzyżowego

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

CPS-capable engineers of today increasingly need to possess both technical and social skills to run CPS-engineering projects successfully. Having technical skills solely is not enough since engineering projects mostly fail because of lacking knowledge, skills and social competencies of project members. The effective holistic teaching methods can help to solve this problem. The aim of this study was to develop, apply and asses an innovative task-centric holistic agile teaching approach (T-CHAT), for the course in CPS-engineering with realistic up-to-date industry-like scenario. The authors conducted four monthly educational experiment with fifteen-person group of volunteers - international students at technical universities in Germany and Russia, during that the authors used the novel method of teaching. The course participants evaluated the effects of education using a novel original questionnaire, estimating knowledge, skills and social competencies at the beginning and end of the course. Feedback of the experiment was positive for the method. The main findings of our study was the innovative teaching approach. (original abstract)

Aby efektywnie pracować w systemach cyber fizycznych CPS inżynierowie muszą posiadać umiejętności techniczne i społeczne, aby z sukcesem realizować projekty inżynieryjne CPS. Posiadanie umiejętności technicznych nie jest wystarczające, ponieważ projekty inżynieryjne zawodzą głównie z powodu braku wiedzy, umiejętności i kompetencji społecznych członków projektu. Skuteczne holistyczne metody nauczania mogą pomóc rozwiązać te problemy. Celem naszego badania było opracowanie, zastosowanie i ocena innowacyjnego, skoncentrowanego na zadaniu, holistycznego podejścia do nauczania (T-CHAT), na potrzeby inżynierii CPS w realistycznym, aktualnym, przemysłowym scenariuszu. Autorzy przeprowadzili czteromiesięczne ekspertyzy edukacyjne z piętnastoosobową grupą wolontariuszy - studentów zagranicznych na uczelniach technicznych w Niemczech i Rosji, podczas których autorzy wykorzystali nowatorską metodę nauczania. Uczestnicy eksperymentu ocenili efekty kształcenia na podstawie nowego oryginalnego kwestionariusza, w odniesieniu do wiedzy, umiejętności i kompetencji społecznych na początku i na końcu kursu. Informacja zwrotna z eksperymentu była pozytywna dla tej metody. Główne wnioski z naszego badania dotyczyły zmiany podejścia do nauczania. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Software; Teaching

PL

Oprogramowanie; Nauczanie

• Czasopismo: Gospodarka, Rynek, Edukacja
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 18
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 5--17

Twórcy

autor

Elena Mäkiö-Marusik

• University of Applied Sciences Emden, Leer, Germany

autor

Juho Mäkiö

• University of Applied Sciences Emden, Leer, Germany

autor

Jolanta Kowal

• University of Wroclaw

Bibliografia

• Bancino R., & Zevalkink C. (2007). Soft Skills: The New Curriculum for Hard-Core Technical Professionals. Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers (J1), 82(5), 20-22.
• Bauer K., & Schneider K. (2013). Teaching Cyber-physical Systems: A Programming Approach. Proceedings of the Workshop on Embedded and Cyber-Physical Systems Education, WESE '12 (pp. 3:1-3:8). Tampere, Finland: ACM. doi:10.1145/2530544.2530547
• Becker G.S. 1964, 1993 (3rd edition) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-04120-9.
• Becker G.S. 1985. Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, special issue: Trends in Women's Work, Education, and Family Building (part 2) (Chicago Journals) 3 (1): pp. 33-pp. 58. doi:10.1086/298075.JSTOR 2534997.
• Cheng A.M.K. (2014). An Undergraduate Cyber-physical Systems Course. Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGBED International Workshop on Design, Modeling, and Evaluation of Cyber-Physical Systems, CyPhy '14 (pp. 31-34). Berlin, Germany: ACM. doi:10.1145/2593458.2593464
• Chun A.H.W. (2004). The agile teaching/learning methodology and its e-learning platform. International Conference on Web-Based Learning (pp. 11-18). Springer.
• Council N.R. (2015). Interim Report on 21st Century Cyber-Physical Systems Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/21762
• Council N.R., Engineering D. on, Sciences P., Science C., Board T., & 21st Century Cyber-Physical Systems Education, C. on. (2015). Interim Report on 21st Century Cyber-Physical Systems Education. National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/Interim-Century-Cyber-Physical-Systems-Education/dp/0309375940%3FSubscriptionId%3D0JYN1NVW651KCA56C102%26tag%3Dtechkie-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0309375940
• Damevski K., Altayeb B., Chen H., & Walter D. (2013). Teaching Cyberphysical Systems to Computer Scientists via Modeling and Verification. Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '13 (pp. 567-572). Denver, Colorado, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2445196.2445365
• De Graaf E., & Kolmos A. (2003). Characteristics of problem-based learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 657-662.
• Dera K. (1984). Lernen für die Praxis:Medien, Techniken,Methoden. Hueber.
• Ertmer P.A. (2015). Essential readings in problem-based learning. Purdue University Press.
• Healey M., & Jenkins A. (2006). Strengthening the teaching-research linkage in undergraduate courses and programs. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2006(107), 43-53.
• Holliday A. (2007). Doing & Writing Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications Ltd. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/Writing-Qualita-tive-Research-Adrian-Holliday/dp/141291129X%3FSubscriptionId%3D0JYN1NVW651KCA56C102%26tag%3Dtechkie-20%26link Code%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D141291129X
• Kowal J., Kwiatkowska A., Kowal W. (2011). IT Project Management in Relation to Employees' Competence in Poland, Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Management Leadership and Governance, pp.217-227, Academic Publishing Limited Reading ,UK.
• Kowal J. & Roztocki N. (2013). Information and communication technology management for global competitiveness and economic growth in emerging economies. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 57.
• Kowal J., & Roztocki N. (2015). Job satisfaction of IT professionals in Poland: does business competence matter? Journal of Business Economics and Management, Volume 16 (Issue 5), 995-1012. DOI: 10.3846/16111699.2014.924988
• Kurki-Suonio K. (2011). Principles supporting the perceptional teaching of physics: A "practical teaching philosophy? Science & Education, 20(3-4), 211-243.
• Lee E.A., Seshia S.A., & Jensen J.C. (2013). Teaching Embedded Systems the Berkeley Way. Proceedings of the Workshop on Embedded and Cyber-Physical Systems Education, WESE '12 (pp. 1:1-1:8). Tampere, Finland: ACM. doi:10.1145/2530544.2530545
• Maekioe J., Maekioe-Marusik E., & Yablochnikov E. (2016). Task-centric holistic agile approach on teaching cyber physical systems engineering. Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 2016-42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE (pp. 6608-6614). IEEE.
• McDermott K.J., Nafalski A., & Gol O. (2007). Project-based teaching in engineering programs. 2007 37th Annual Frontiers In Education Conference-Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports (p. S1D-11). IEEE.
• McGowan H., (2011). Planning a Comparative Experiment in Educational Settings, Journal of Statistics Education, Volume 19, Number 2 (2011).
• Mills J.E., Treagust D.F., & others. (2003). Engineering education-Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer. Australasian journal of engineering education, 3(2), 2-16.
• Monasor M.J., Parkes J., Noll J., Vizcaino A., Piattini M., & Beecham S. (2014). Global Software Development Education: A commercial perspective from a case study. Global Software Engineering (ICGSE), 2014 IEEE 9th International Conference on (pp. 173-182). IEEE.
• Simkovic M., 2013. Risk-Based Student Loans. Washington and Lee Law Review, 70 (1): 527. SSRN 1941070.
• Strittmatter-Haubold V., & Ehlail F. (2012). Lernen im Aufwind. Methodenreader zur Gestaltung von Lernprozessen. 8th Edition, Institut für Weiterbildung, Pädagogische Hochschule Heidelberg.
• Taha W., Cartwright R., Philippsen R., & Zeng Y. (2015). Developing A First Course on Cyber-Physical Systems. Proceedings of the WESE'14: Workshop on Embedded and Cyber-Physical Systems Education, WESE'14 (pp. 6:1-6:8). New Delhi, India: ACM. doi:10.1145/2829957.2829964
• Törngren M., Bensalem S., McDermid J., Passerone R., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli A., & Schätz B. (2015). Education and Training Challenges in the Era of Cyber-Physical Systems: Beyond Traditional Engineering. Proceedings of the WESE'15: Workshop on Embedded and Cyber-Physical Systems Education, WESE'15 (pp. 8:1-8:5). Amsterdam, Netherlands: ACM. doi:10.1145/2832920.2832928
• Wade J. Ph.D., Cohen R. Ph.D., Blackburn M. Ph.D., Hole E., & Bowen N. Ph.D. (2015). Systems Engineering of Cyber-Physical Systems Education Program. Proceedings of the WESE'15: Workshop on Embedded and Cyber-Physical Systems Education, WESE'15 (pp. 7:1-7:8). Amsterdam, Netherlands: ACM. doi:10.1145/2832920.2832927
• Wood D., Wood H., & Middleton D. (1978). An experimental evaluation of four face-to-face teaching strategies. International journal of behavioral development, 1(2), 131-147.