Neighbouring the Different : Social Interaction in a Warsaw Subarea

• Autorzy: Ewa Korcelli-Olejniczak , Filip Piotrowski
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In the paper patterns of social interaction are examined, as shaped by an inflow of new residents to an inner-city subarea characterized by a low socio-economic status and featuring ethnic homogeneity. The empirical material is derived from a set of semi-structured interviews conducted by the authors with the area's inhabitants, and with representatives of local governance arrangement and initiatives. The analysis is based on the concepts of social hyper-diversity, social networks, the concept of place and the research on gentrification. Sub-categories of residents are distinguished by referring to both functional and emotional types of social relations they enter into. The findings point at the formation of networks of integrative nature, mostly such that are supported by the use of common urban space, across the social categories identified, but also to limits and obstacles to social integration, both general and those specific to the case study area. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Social interaction; Interpersonal relationship

PL

Interakcje społeczne; Stosunki międzyludzkie

• Czasopismo: Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series
• Rocznik: 2018
• Numer: No. 39
• Strony: 53--63

Twórcy

autor

Ewa Korcelli-Olejniczak

• Polish Academy of Sciences

autor

Filip Piotrowski

• Polish Academy of Sciences

Bibliografia

• Alesina, A. and Ferrara E.L. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 85, 207-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00084-6.
• Altman, I. and Low, S.M. (1992). Place attachment (Human Behaviour and Environment). New York, London: Plenum Press.
• Badyina, A. and Golubchikov, O. (2005). Gentrification in central Moscow: A market process or a deliberate policy? Money, power and people in housing regeneration in Ostozhenka. Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geography, 87, 113-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2005.00186.x.
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Malden: Polity Press.
• Blokland, T.V. and Nast, J. (2014). From public familiarity to comfort zone: The relevance of absent ties for belonging in mixed neighbourhoods. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, 1142-1159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12126.
• Blokland, T. and Van Eijk, G. (2010). Do People Who Like Diversity Practice Diversity in Neighbourhood Life? Neighbourhood Use and the Social Networks of 'Diversity-Seekers in a Mixed Neighbourhood in the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36, 313-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830903387436.
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.
• Brown, B., Perkins, D.D. and Brown, G. (2004). Incivilities, place attachment and crime: Block and individual effects. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 359-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.01.001.
• Bulter, T. (2003). Living in the Bubble: Gentrification and its 'Others' in North London. Urban Studies, 40, 2469-2486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000136165.
• Castells, M. (1983). The City and the grassroots: a cross-cultural theory of urban social movement. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Caulfield, J. (1994). City Form and Everyday Life: Toronto's Gentrification and Critical Social Practice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
• Corcoran, M. (2002). Place attachment and community sentiment: A European case study. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 11, 47-67.
• Crow, G. and Allan, G. (1994). Community Life: Introduction to Local Social Relationships. London: Routledge.
• Degiovanni, F.F. (1983). Patterns of Change in Housing Market Activity in Revitalizing Neighbourhoods. Journal of the American Planning Association, 49, 22-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368308976193.
• Dekker, K. (2007). Social Capital, neighbourhood attachment and participation in distressed urban areas: a case study in Utrecht and The Hague. Housing Studies, 22, 255-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030701254103.
• District Ranking. (2013). Ranking dzielnic Warszawy pod względem atrakcyjności warunków Życia (Warsaw District ranking according to the attractiveness of living conditions - in Polish). Urząd Statystyczny w Warszawie, Warsaw: Mazowiecki Ośrodek Badań Regionalnych.
• Elias, N. and Scotson J.L. (1994). The Established and the Outsiders, London: Sage.
• Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.
• Forrest, R. and Kearns, A. (1999). Joined-up Places? Social Cohesion and Neighbourhood Regeneration. York: York Publishing Services for Joseph Rowntree Trust.
• Friedmann, J. and Wolff, G. (1982). World City Formation: An Agenda for Research and Action. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 6, 309-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1982.tb00384.x.
• Gitell, R. and Vidal, A. (1998). Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy. London: Sage Publishing.
• Glass, R. (1964). London. Aspects of Change. Report No. 3, Centre for Urban Studies. London: MacGibbon & Kee.
• Goodhart, D. (2004). 'Too Diverse?' Prospect (Online). London: Prospect. Available at http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2004/02/toodiverse-david-goodhart-multiculturalism-britainimmigration-globalisation/ (DoA: 01.02.2011).
• Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
• Hay, R. (1998). Sense of place in a developmental context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 5-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1997.0060.
• Hickman, M., Crowley, H. and Mai, N. (2008). Immigration and Social Cohesion in the UK. The rythms and realities of everyday life. London: London Metropolitan University.
• Holcomb, H.B. and Beauregard, R.A. (1981). Revitalizing Cities. Washington: Association of American Geographers.
• Jackson, E. and Butler, T. (2014). Revisiting 'social tectonics': The middle classes and social mix in gentrifying neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 51, 1512-1528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014547370.
• Jakóbczyk-Gryszkiewicz, J. ed. (2015). Procesy Gentryfikacji w Obszarach Śródmiejskich Wielkich Miast. Na Przykładzie Warszawy, Łodzi i Gdańska (Gentrification in the Inner- city. The Lessons from Warsaw, Łódź and Gdańsk - in Polish). Studia KPZK PAN, CLXV, Warszawa: PAN.
• Jałowiecki, B. (2010). Społeczne wytwarzanie przestrzeni. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
• Korcelli-Olejniczak E. (2014). Partycypacja nauki i jej instytucji w kształtowaniu przestrzeni miasta (Participation of science and its institutions in the creation of city space - in Polish). Partnerstwo i odpowiedzialność w funkcjonowaniu miasta, Warszawa: KPZK PAN, 52-63.
• Korcelli-Olejniczak, E., Bierzyński, A. and Węcławowicz, G. (2014). Governanace arrangements and initiatives in Warsaw, Poland. Warsaw: IGSO PAS. Available online: http://www.urbandivercities.eu/wpcontent/uploads/2013/05/Poland_WP5_FinalReport.pdf (DoA: 29.12.2017).
• Korcelli-Olejniczak E., Bierzyński A., Dworzański P. Grochowski M., Piotrowski F. and Węcławowicz, G. (2017). DIVERCITIES: Dealing with Urban Diversity. The case of Warsaw. Warsaw: IGSO PASc.
• Korcelli-Olejniczak E. and Piotrowski F. (2017). Diverse and different: on the faces of social solidarity in Warsaw. Geographia Polonica, 90, 265-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0093.
• Kovacs, Z. (1998). Ghettoisation or Gentrification? Post-socialist scenarios for Budapest. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 12, 63-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496934.
• Kovacs, Z., Wiesner, R. and Zischner, R. (2013). Urban Renewal in the Inner-City of Budapest: Gentrification from a Post-socialist Perspective. Urban Studies, 50, 22-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012453856.
• Larsen, J., Urry, J. and Axhaussen, K. (2005). Social networks and future mobilities. Report to the UK Department of Transport. Zurich: (Lancaster and Zurich) Department of Sociology, University of Lancaster, IVT, ETH Zurich.
• Lees, L., Slater, T. and Wyly, E. (2008). Gentrification. New York, London: Routledge.
• Letki, N. (2008). Does Diversity Erode Social Cohesion? Social Capital and Race in British Neighbourhoods. Political Studies, 56(1), 99-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00692.x.
• Lewicka, M. (2008). Place attachment place identity and place memory: Restoring the forgotten city past. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 208-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.001.
• Ley, D. (1983). A Social Geography of the City. New York: Harper and Row.
• LPR. 2004: Lokalny Program Rewitalizacji Miasta Stołecznego Warszawy na lata 2005-2013 (Local Revitalization Program of the City of Warsaw for the period of 2005-2013)- in Polish). Warszawa: Urząd M. st. Warszawy.
• Middleton, A., Murie, A. and Growes, R. (2005). Social capital and neighbourhoods that work. Urban Studies, 42, 1711-1738. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500231589.
• Ouředníček, M., Pospíšilová, L., Špačková, P., Temelová, J. and Novák, J. (2012). Prostorová typologie a zonace Prahy (Spatial typology and zoning of Prague - in Czech). In: Ouředníček, M. and Temelová, J. editors, Sociální proměny pražských čtvrtí, Praha: Academia, 268-297.
• Pattillo, M. (2007). Black on the Block: The Politics of Race and Class in the City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Peters, K., Elands, B. and Buijs, A. (2010). Social Interactions in Urban Parks: Stimulating Social Cohesion? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9, 93-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.11.003.
• Pinkster, F.M., Permentier, M. and Wittebrood, K. (2014). Moving Considerations of middle-class residents in Dutch Disadvantaged Neighbourhoods: Exploring the Relationship between Disorder and Attachment. Environment and Planning, 46, 2898-2914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a130082p.
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
• Putnam, R. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 137-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x.
• Riger, S. and Lavrakas, P.J. (1981). Community ties: Patterns of attachment and interaction in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 55-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00896360.
• Rose, D. (1984). Rethinking gentrification: beyond the uneven development of Marxist urban theory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 1, 47-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d020047.
• Rothenberg, T. (1995). And she told two friends: lesbian creating urban social space. In mapping desire: geographies of sexualities, London: Routledge, 165-181.
• Sandercock, L. (2000). When Strangers Become Neighbours: Managing Cities of Difference. Journal of Planning Theory and Practice, 1(1), 13-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350050135176.
• Slater, T. (2011). Gentrification of the City. The New Blackwell Companion to the City, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 571-585.
• Smith, D. P. (2005). 'Studentification': the gentrification factory? Gentrification in a global context. The new urban colonialism, 72-89. Routledge, London.
• Smith, N. (1979). Toward a theory of Gentrification: a back to the city movement by capital not people. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45, 538-548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367908977002.
• Smith, N. (1987). Of Yuppies and Housing: Gentrification, Social Restructuring and the Urban Dream. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 5, 151-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d050151.
• Sykora, L. (2005). Gentrification in post-communist cities. Gentrification in a Global Context: The new urban colonialism, New York, London: Routledge, 90-105.
• Sykora L. and Bouzarovski S. (2011). Multiple transformations: Conceptualising the post-communist urban transition. Urban Studies, 49, 43-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010397402.
• Tasan-Kok, T., Van Kempen, R., Raco, M. and Bolt, G. (2014). Towards hyper-diversified European Cities. A critical literature Review. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
• Taylor, M. (2003). Harlem: between heaven and hell. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Tölle A. (2014). Transnationalisation of urban development strategies: Peculiarities of the East-Central European post-socialist city. Cities in a complex world: Problems, challenges and prospects, Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 105-118.
• Tönnies, F. (1887). Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft, Darmstadt.
• Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and space: the perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Van Kempen, R. and Van Weesep, J. (1994). Gentrification and the Urban Poor: Urban Restructuring and Housing Policy in Utrecht. Urban Studies, 31, 143-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989420080941.
• Van Weesep, J. (1994). Gentrification as a Research Frontier. Progress in Human Geography, 18, 74-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259401800107.
• Vorkin, M. and Riese, H. (2001). Environmental concern in a local context. The significance of place attachment. Environment and Behavior, 33, 249-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121972972.
• Węcławowicz, G. (2004). Where the Grass is Greener in Poland: Regional and Intra-Urban Inequalities. Geographies and Moralities. International Perspectives on Development, Justice and Place, London: Blackwell, 62-77.
• Wellman, B. and Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks. Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 558-588.
• Wood, L.J., Giles-Corti, B., Bulsara, M.K. and Bosch, D.A. (2007). More than a furry companion: the ripple effect of companion animals on neighbourhood interactions and sense of community. Society & Animals, 15, 43-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853007X169333.
• Woolcock, M. (2001). The place of social capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcomes. ISUMA Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2, 11-17.
• ZPR. (2015). Zintegrowany Program Rewitalizacji Miasta St. Warszawy na lata 2014-2022 (Integrated Revitalization Program of the City of Warsaw for the period of 2014-2022 - in Polish). Warszawa: Urząd M. st. Warszawy.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/bog-2018-0004