Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2018 | 26 | nr 1 | 121--148
Tytuł artykułu

The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility : a Literature Overview and Integrative Framework

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Purpose: The goal of this paper is to develop a framework describing the mechanisms which explain how and when CSR engagement affects company's bottom line, based on a review of the business case for CSR literature.

Approach: This article is conceptual and based on literature review. By using a CSR stage development model, behavioral and stakeholder perspectives, it offers a descriptive multi-dimensional integrative framework of the business case for CSR.

Findings: The findings show that the relationship between engagement in CSR activities and corporate performance (CP) depends on a CSR development stage, managerial interpretation of CSR issues, stakeholder management model and moderating factors.

Originality: This article integrates disconnected models and conceptualizations in the subject literature and contributes to the theoretical discussion by arguing that type and scale of benefits from CSR activity progress along the stages of organizational CSR development. Moreover, it also shows that the CSR-CP relationship depends on internal and external factors (mediators and moderators). It therefore supports the contingency argument. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • Koźmiński University, Poland
  • Aerts, W. and Cormier, D. (2009). Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(1): 1-27,
  • Aguinis, H. and Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4): 932-968.
  • Akisik, O. and Gal, G. (2017). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility and Internal Controls on Stakeholders' View of the Firm and Financial Performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(3).
  • Aragón-Correa, J.A. and Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1): 71-88,
  • Bai, X. and Chang, J. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: The mediating role of marketing competence and the moderating role of market environment. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(2): 505-530.
  • Basu, K., and Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122-136,
  • Barnett, M.L. and Salomon, R.M. (2006). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11): 1101-1122,
  • Baron, R.M., and Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173-1182.
  • Berman, S.L., Wicks, A.C., Kotha, S., and Jones, T.M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 488-506,
  • Bhattacharya, C. and Sen, S. (2004). Doing Better at Doing Good: when, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1): 9-24,
  • Bode, C., Singh, J., and Rogan, M. (2015). Corporate social initiatives and employee retention. Organization Science, 26(6): 1702-1720,
  • Boesso, G., Favotto, F. and Michelon, G. (2015). Stakeholder prioritization, strategic corporate social responsibility and company performance: further evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6): 424-440.
  • Branco, M.C. and Rodrigues, L.L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2): 111-132,
  • Bridoux, F. and Stoelhorst, J.W. (2014). Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 107-125,
  • Brown, T.J. and Dacin, P.A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. The Journal of Marketing, 61(1): 68-84.
  • Burke, L. and Logsdon, J.M. (1996). How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning, 29(4): 495-502.
  • Carnahan, S., Kryscynski, D. and Olson, D. (2017). When does corporate social responsibility reduce employee turnover? Evidence from attorneys before and after 9/11. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5): 1932-1962.
  • Carnevale, C., Mazzuca, M. and Venturini, S. (2012). Corporate social reporting in European banks: the effects on a firm's market value. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(3): 159-177,
  • Carroll, A.B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4): 497-505.
  • Carroll, A.B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4): 39-48.
  • Carroll, A. and Shabana, K. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1): 85-105,
  • Cheng, B., Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 1-23.
  • Chin, M.K., Hambrick, D.C. and Treviño, L.K. (2013). Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives' values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2): 197-232,
  • Clarkson, M.E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 92-117.
  • Copeland, T., Koller, T. and Murrin, J. (2000). Valuation Measuring and Managing The Value of Companies. New York: John Wiley&Sons.
  • Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2(3): 70-76.
  • De Roeck, K., El Akremi, A. and Swaen, V. (2016). Consistency Matters! How and When Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Employees' Organizational Identification?. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7): 1141-1168.
  • Delmas, M., Hoffmann, V.H. and Kuss, M. (2011). Under the tip of the iceberg: Absorptive capacity, environmental strategy, and competitive advantage. Business & Society, 50(1): 116-154.
  • Delmas, M.A., Etzion, D., and Nairn-Birch, N. (2013). Triangulating environmental performance: What do corporate social responsibility ratings really capture?. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(3): 255-267.
  • Deng, X., Kang, J.K. and Low, B.S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(1): 87-109,
  • Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T.W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2): 252-284.
  • Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65-91.
  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C.B. and Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3): 224-241:
  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. and Sen, S. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage: Overcoming the trust barrier. Management Science, 57(9): 1528-1545,
  • Eccles, R.G., Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11): 2835-2857.
  • Evans, R.W. and Davis, W.D. (2011). An examination of perceived corporate citizenship, job applicant attraction, and CSR work role definition. Business & Society, 50(3): 456-480.
  • Farooq, O., Payaud, M., Merunka, D. and Valette-Florence, P. (2014). The impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment: Exploring multiple mediation mechanisms. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4): 563-580.
  • Flammer, C. and Luo, J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility as an employee governance tool: Evidence from a quasi-experiment. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2): 163-183, http://10.1002/smj.2492
  • Ferreira, A.I. and Ribeiro, I. (2017). Are you willing to pay the price? The impact of corporate social (ir)responsibility on consumer behavior towards national and foreign brands. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 16(1): 63-71.
  • Gao, J. and Bansal, P. (2013). Instrumental and integrative logics in business sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2): 241-255,
  • Goh, S.K. and Balaji, M.S. (2016). Linking green skepticism to green purchase behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131: 629-638.
  • Godfrey, P.C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4): 777-798,
  • Godfrey, P.C., Merrill, C.B. and Hansen, J.M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4): 425-445,
  • Gond, J.P., El Akremi, A., Swaen, V. and Babu, N. (2017). The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person-centric systematic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2): 225-246,
  • Greening, D.W. and Turban, D.B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39(3): 254-280.
  • Fernández Sánchez, J.L., Luna Sotorrío, L. and Baraibar Diez, E. (2015). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate reputation in a turbulent environment: Spanish evidence of the Ibex35 firms. Corporate Governance, 15(4): 563-575.
  • Hafenbrändl, S. and Waeger, D. (2017). Ideology and microfoundations of CSR: Why executives believe in the business case for CSR and how this affects their CSR engagements. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), 1582-1606,
  • Hahn, T. and Aragón-Correa, J.A. (2015). Toward cognitive plurality on corporate sustainability in organizations: The role of organizational factors. Organization and Environment, 28(3): 255-263,
  • Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J. and Figge, F. (2015). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4): 463-487,
  • Hambrick, D.C. and Mason, P.A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2): 193-206.
  • Hart, S. and Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5: 30-37.
  • Hart, S.L. and Dowell, G. (2011). Invited editorial: a natural-resource-based view of the firm: fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5): 1464-1479,
  • Hawn, O. and Ioannou, I. (2016). Mind the gap: The interplay between external and internal actions in the case of corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 37(13): 2569-2588.
  • Hillman, A.J. and Keim, G.D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?. Strategic Management Journal, 22(2): 125-139,
  • Hull, C.E. and Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7): 781-789.
  • Husted, B.W. and Allen, D.B. (2007). Strategic corporate social responsibility and value creation among large firms: lessons from the Spanish experience. Long Range Planning, 40(6): 594-610,
  • Isaksson, L.E. and Woodside, A.G. (2016). Modeling firm heterogeneity in corporate social performance and financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 69(9): 3285-3314,
  • Jensen, M. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. European Financial Management, 7(3): 297-317,
  • Jo, H. and Na, H. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4): 441-456.
  • Kahneman, D. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 278.
  • Karnani, A. (2011). Doing well by doing good: the grand illusion. California Management Review, 52(2): 69-86,
  • Korschun, D., Bhattacharya, C.B. and Swain, S.D. (2014). Corporate social responsibility, customer orientation, and the job performance of frontline employees. Journal of Marketing, 78(3): 20-37.
  • Krukowska, M. (2014). Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility in Japanese Companies. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 22(4): 39-57.
  • Kurucz, E.C., Colbert, B.A. and Wheeler, D. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility. In: The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lins, K.V., Servaes, H., and Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72(4): 1785-1824.
  • Lu, W.M., Wang, W.K., and Lee, H.L. (2013). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: evidence from the US semiconductor industry. International Journal of Production Research, 51(19): 5683-5695.
  • Lu, W., Chau, K. W., Wang, H. and Pan, W. (2014). A decade's debate on the nexus between corporate social and corporate financial performance: a critical review of empirical studies 2002-2011. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79: 195-206.
  • Mackey, A., Mackey, T.B., and Barney, J.B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 817-835.
  • Madueño, J.H., Jorge, M.L., Conesa, I.M. and Martínez-Martínez, D. (2016). Relationship between corporate social responsibility and competitive performance in Spanish SMEs: Empirical evidence from a stakeholders' perspective. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(1): 55-72.
  • Maon, F., Lindgreen, A. and Swaen, V. (2010). Organizational stages and cultural phases: A critical review and a consolidative model of corporate social responsibility development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1): 20-38.
  • Margolis, J.D. and Walsh, J.P. (2001). People and profits?: The search for a link between a company's social and financial performance. Psychology Press.
  • Margolis, J.D. and Walsh, J.P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2): 268-305,
  • Matten, D. and Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 166-179,
  • McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21: 603-609.
  • McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 117-127,
  • Michelon, G., Boesso, G. and Kumar, K. (2013). Examining the link between strategic corporate social responsibility and company performance: an analysis of the best corporate citizens. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(2): 81-94, http://10.1002/csr.1278
  • Mirońska, D. and Zaborek, P. (2014). Polacy wobec marketingu społecznie zaangażowanego. Marketing i Rynek, 1(21): 32-41.
  • Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., and Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853-886,
  • Mohr, L.A. and Webb, D.J. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1): 121-147.
  • Orlitzky, M. (2008). Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Research Synthesis. In: The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford University Press.
  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. and Rynes, S. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: a meta analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3): 403-411,
  • Park, S.Y. and Lee, S. (2009). Financial rewards for social responsibility: A mixed picture for restaurant companies. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 50(2): 168-179.
  • Park, E., Kim, K.J. and Kwon, S.J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility as a determinant of consumer loyalty: An examination of ethical standard, satisfaction, and trust. Journal of Business Research, 76: 8-13.
  • Porter, M. and Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy and Society. The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, December: 78-92.
  • Porter, M. and Kramer, M. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, November/December: 62-77.
  • Porter, M. and Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4): 97-118.
  • Przychodzeń, W. (2013). Greenwashing-Myth or Reality in the World of Business? Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 21(4): 132-138.
  • Russo, M.V., and Fouts, P.A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3): 534-559,
  • Prahalad, C.K. and Hart S.L. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy + Business, 26: 1-14.
  • Rowley, T., and Berman, S. (2000). A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business & Society, 39(4): 397-418.
  • Saeidi, S.P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S.P. and Saaeidi, S.A. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68(2): 341-350.
  • Sarkar, S. and Searcy, C. (2016). Zeitgeist or chameleon? A quantitative analysis of CSR definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135: 1423-1435,
  • Schons, L. and Steinmeier, M. (2016). Walk the talk? How symbolic and substantive CSR actions affect firm performance depending on stakeholder proximity. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 23(6): 358-372.
  • Schreck, P. (2011). Reviewing the business case for corporate social responsibility: New evidence and analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(2): 167-188, http://10.1007/s10551-011-0867-0
  • Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C.B. and Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2): 158-166,
  • Servaes, H. and Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59(5): 1045-1061,
  • Sharma, S. and Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities, Strategic Management Journal, 19(8): 729-753.
  • Skarmeas, D. and Leonidou, C.N. (2013). When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research, 66(10): 1831-1838,
  • Slack, R.E., Corlett, S. and Morris, R. (2015). Exploring employee engagement with (corporate) social responsibility: A social exchange perspective on organisational participation. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3): 537-548.
  • Smith, N.C. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: whether or how? California Management Review, 45(4): 52-76,
  • Sohn, M., Sohn, W., Klaas-Wissing, T. and Hirsch, B. (2015). The influence of corporate social performance on employer attractiveness in the transport and logistics industry: Insights from German junior talent. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 45(5): 486-505.
  • Stahl, G.K. and De Luque, M.S. (2014). Antecedents of responsible leader behavior: A research synthesis, conceptual framework, and agenda for future research. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3): 235-254, http://10.5465/amp.2013.0126
  • Story, J. and Neves, P. (2015). When corporate social responsibility (CSR) increases performance: exploring the role of intrinsic and extrinsic CSR attribution. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(2): 111-124.
  • Szekely, F. and Strebel, H. (2013). Incremental, radical and game-changing: strategic innovation for sustainability. Corporate Governance, 13(5): 467-481,
  • Tang, Z., Hull, C.E. and Rothenberg, S. (2012). How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR-financial performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7): 1274-1303, http://10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01068.x
  • Theodoulidis, B., Diaz, D., Crotto, F. and Rancati, E. (2017). Exploring corporate social responsibility and financial performance through stakeholder theory in the tourism industries. Tourism Management, 62: 173-188.
  • Uzunoğlu, E., Türkel, S. and Akyar, B.Y. (2017). Engaging consumers through corporate social responsibility messages on social media: An experimental study. Public Relations Review, 43(5): 989-997.
  • Varadarajan, P. and Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52: 58-74.
  • Vogel, D. (2005). Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47(4): 19-45,
  • Vlachos, P.A., Panagopoulos, N.G. and Rapp, A.A. (2013). Feeling good by doing good: Employee CSR-induced attributions, job satisfaction, and the role of charismatic leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(3): 577-588,
  • Vogel, D. (2010). The private regulation of global corporate conduct: Achievements and limitations. Business & Society, 49(1): 68-87,
  • Waddock, S. and Graves, S. (1997a). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Academy of Management Review, 10: 758-769.
  • Waddock, S. and Graves, S. (1997b). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4): 303-319.
  • Waddock, S., and Smith, N. (2000). Relationships: The real challenge of corporate global citizenship. Business and Society Review, 105(1): 47-62,
  • Wahba, H. (2008). Does the market value corporate environmental responsibility? An empirical examination. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(2): 89-99,
  • Wang, C.J. (2014). Do ethical and sustainable practices matter? Effects of corporate citizenship on business performance in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 26(6): 930-947.
  • Wang, K., Sewon, O. and Claiborne, M.C. (2008). Determinants and consequences of voluntary disclosure in an emerging market: Evidence from China. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 17(1): 14-30.
  • Wang, Q., Dou, J., Weaver, A. and Jia, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Business & Society, 55(8): 1083-1121,
  • Wasilewska, E. (2010). Raportowanie społeczne przedsiębiorstw: koncepcja i rola międzynarodowych standardów raportowania. Master of Business Administration, 18(4): 93-104.
  • Wierciński, S. (2011). CSR jako przedsięwzięcie biznesowe. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 19: 54-67.
  • Weaver, G.R., Reynolds, S.J. and Brown, M.E. (2014). Moral intuition: Connecting current knowledge to future organizational research and practice. Journal of Management, 40(1): 100-129,
  • Wood, D.J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4): 691-718.
  • Wood, D.J. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1): 50-84,
  • Wójcik, P. (2013). The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives and Price Premiums on Polish Consumers' Responses: An Experimental Study. International Journal of Management and Economics, 38(1): 84-101,
  • Wójcik, P. (2016). How Creating Shared Value Differs From Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 24(2): 32-55,
  • Yuen, K.F., Thai, V.V. and Wong, Y.D. (2016). Are customers willing to pay for corporate social responsibility? A study of individual-specific mediators. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(7-8): 912-926.
  • Zaborek, P. (2014). CSR and financial performance: The case of Polish small and medium manufacturers. International Journal of Management and Economics, 43(1): 53-73,
  • Zamanou, S., and R. Glaser, S. (1994). Moving toward participation and involvement: Managing and measuring organizational culture. Group & Organization Management, 19(4): 475-502.
  • Zhu, Q., Yin, H., Liu, J. and Lai, K.H. (2014). How is employee perception of organizational efforts in corporate social responsibility related to their satisfaction and loyalty towards developing harmonious society in Chinese enterprises? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(1): 28-40.
  • Zollo, M., Bettinazzi, E.L., Neumann, K. and Snoeren, P. (2016). Toward a comprehensive model of organizational evolution: Dynamic capabilities for innovation and adaptation of the enterprise model. Global Strategy Journal, 6(3): 225-244,
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.