PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2018 | 11 | nr 1 | 93--107
Tytuł artykułu

Economic Growth and Unemployment Issue: Panel Data Analysis in Eastern European Countries

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The concepts of economic growth and unemployment are at the beginning of the most important variables in the sense that all economies are choosing and implementing economic policies. The purpose of this study to investigate the relation between economic growth and unemployment in Eastern European Countries for the period of 1992-2014 within panel data framework. In this paper this relationship has been examined in the context of Okun's Law. Panel Unit Root, Pooled Panel OLS and Panel Johansen Co-integration tests are applied respectively. The results show that the economic growth and unemployment series are stationary at first level, unemployment affected positively by economic growth, in other words 1% rise in GDP will fall the unemployment rate by 0.08% because of Okun's coefficient for Eastern European Countries and there is a co-integration between these important macroeconomic variables. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
11
Numer
Strony
93--107
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Hacettepe University, Turkey
  • Hacettepe University, Turkey
autor
  • Hacettepe University, Turkey
Bibliografia
  • Aghion, P. ve Howitt,P. (1990). A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323-351.
  • Akram, M., Hussain, S., Raza, S. H., & Masood, S. (2014). An empirical estimation of Okun's Law in context of Pakistan. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2(5), 173-177. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270608121_An_Empirical_Estimation_of_Okun'S_Law_in_Context_of_Pakistan.
  • Al-Habees, M. A., & Rumman, M. A. (2012). The relationship between unemployment and economic growth in Jordan and some Arab countries. World Applied Sciences Journal, 18(5), 673-680.
  • Andrei, D. B., Vasile, D., & Adrian, E. (2009). The correlation between unemployment and real GDP growth. A study case on Romania. Analele Unıversıtăţıı Dın Oradea, 316.
  • Anton Muscatelli, V., & Tirelli, P. (2001). Unemployment and growth: some empirical evidence from structural time series models. Applied Economics, 33(8), 1083-1088. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00036840010003276.
  • Apergis, N., & Rezitis, A. (2003). An examination of Okun's law: evidence from regional areas in Greece. Applied Economics, 35(10), 1147-1151. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0003684032000066787.
  • Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609-626). Princeton University Press.
  • Asteriou, D., & Hall, S. G. (2007). Applied Econometrics: a modern approach, revised edition. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Asteriou, D., & Stephen, G. Hall 2007 Applied Econometrics: A Modern Approach Using Eviews and Microfit (Revised Edition).
  • Attfield, C. L., & Silverstone, B. (1998). Okun's law, cointegration and gap variables. Journal of Macroeconomics, 20(3), 625-637. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-0704(98)00076-7.
  • Barreto, H., & Howland, F. (1993). There are two Okun's law relationships between output and unemployment. Crawfordsville, Wabash College.
  • Ceylan, S., & Sahin, B. Y. (2010). Asymmetry in the Erlationship Between Unemployment and Economic Growth. Dogus University Journal, 11(2), 157-165. Retrieved from http://journal.dogus.edu.tr/index.php/duj/article/view/15.
  • Christopoulos, D. K. (2004). The relationship between output and unemployment: Evidence from Greek regions. Papers in Regional Science, 83(3), 611-620. doi.10.1111/j.1435-5597.2004.tb01928.66
  • Dritsaki, C., & Dritsakis, N. (2009). Okun's coefficient for four Mediterranean member countries of EU: an empirical study. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(5), 18. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v4n5p18.
  • Ercan, N. Y. (2000). İçsel Büyüme Teorisi: Genel Bir Bakış. Planlama Dergisi Özel Sayı-DPT'nin Kuruluşunun 42. Yılı.
  • Eser, B. Y. (2014). Ekonomik Büyüme ve İşsizlik İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. TISK Academy/TISK Akademi, 9(18). http://www.tisk.org.tr/akademi.asp.
  • Evans, G. W. (1989). Output and unemployment dynamics in the United States: 1950-1985. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 4(3), 213-237. DOI: 10.1002/jae.3950040302.
  • Fatai, B. O., & Bankole, A. (2013). Empirical test of Okun's Law in Nigeria. International Journal of Economic Practices and Theories, 3(3), 227-231. Retrieved from http://ijept.org/index.php/ijept/article/view/Empirical_Test_of_Okun_Law_in_Nigeria.
  • Fouquau, J. (2008). Threshold effects in Okun's law: a panel data analysis. Economics Bulletin, 5, 1. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00565477/document.
  • Freeman, D. G. (2001). Panel tests of Okun's law for ten industrial countries. Economic Inquiry, 39(4), 511-523. doi:10.1093/ei/39.4.511.
  • Garavito, C. (2002). La ley de Okun en el Perú: 1970-2000. Pontificia Universidad Católica Del Perú, Departamento De Economia. [PDF] 184.168.109.199.
  • Güvenek, B., & Alptekin, V. (2010). Energy Consumption And Economic Growth: A Panel Data Analyses for Oecd Countries. Enerji, Piyasa Ve Düzenleme, 1(2), 172-193.
  • Harris, R., & Silverstone, B. (2001). Testing for asymmetry in Okun's law: A cross-country comparison. Economics Bulletin, 5(2), 1-13. Retrieved from http://www.economicsbulletin.com/2001/volume5/EB-01E00001A.pdf.
  • Holmes, M. J., & Silverstone, B. (2006). Okun's law, asymmetries and jobless recoveries in the United States: A Markov-switching approach. Economics Letters, 92(2), 293-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.03.006.
  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of econometrics, 115(1), 53-74. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7.
  • Kitov, I. (2011). Okun's law revisited: Is there structural unemployment in developed countries?, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1883003.
  • Knotek II, E. S. (2007). How useful is Okun's law?. Economic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 92(4), 73.
  • Kreishan, F. M. (2011). Economic growth and unemployment: An empirical analysis. Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 228-231.
  • Lal, I., Muhammad, S. D., Jalil, M. A., & Hussain, A. (2010). Test of Okun's law in some Asian countries cointegration approach. Journal of Scientific Research, 40(1), 73-80. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1562602.
  • Lee, J. (2000). The robustness of Okun's law: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of macroeconomics, 22(2), 331-356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-0704(00)00135-X.
  • Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of econometrics, 108(1), 1-24. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7.
  • Lin, S. C. (2008). Smooth-time-varying Okun's coefficients. Economic Modelling, 25(2), 363-375. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2007.06.009.
  • Lozanoska, A., & Dzambaska, E. (2014). Economic Growth And Unemployment: An Empirical Analysis (A Case Study On The Republic Of Macedonia). Economic Development/Ekonomiski Razvoj, 16(3). Retrieved from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=59654.
  • Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of monetary economics, 22(1), 3-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7.
  • Makun, K., & Azu, N. P. (2015). Economic Growth And Unemployment In Fiji: A Cointegration Analysis. International Journal of Development and Economic Sustainability, 3(4), 49-60.
  • Marinkov, M., & Geldenhuys, J. P. (2007). Cyclical unemployment and cyclical output: An estimation of Okun's coefficient for South Africa. South African Journal of Economics, 75(3), 373-390. doi:10.1111/j.1813-6982.2007.00134.
  • Moosa, I. A. (1997). A cross-country comparison of Okun's coefficient. Journal of Comparative Economics, 24(3), 335-356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.1997.1433.
  • Moosa, I. A. (1999). Cyclical output, cyclical unemployment, and Okun's coefficient A structural time series approach. International Review of Economics & Finance, 8(3), 293-304. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1059-0560(99)00028-3.
  • Okun, A. M. (1963). Potential GNP: its measurement and significance (pp. 98-103). Yale University, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics.
  • Palley, T. I. (1993). Okun's Law and the asymmetric and changing cyclical behaviour of the USA economy. International Review of Applied Economics, 7(2), 144-162. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/758530144.
  • Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric theory, 20(3), 597-625. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073.
  • Phiri, A. (2014). Nonlinear co-integration between unemployment and economic growth in South Africa. Managing Global Transitions, 12(4), 303.
  • Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of political economy, 94(5), 1002-1037. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/261420.
  • Ruxandra, P. (2015). The Specifics Of Okun'S Law In The Romanian Economy Between 2007 And 2013. Annals-Economy Series, 1, 50-53.
  • Semmler, W., & Zhang, W. (2005). The impact of output growth, labor market institutions, and macro policies on unemployment. Working paper, SCEPA.
  • Shaw, G. K. (1992). Policy implications of endogenous growth theory. The Economic Journal, 102(412), 611-621. DOI: 10.2307/2234298.
  • Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70(1), 65-94.
  • Villaverde, J., & Maza, A. (2009). The robustness of Okun's law in Spain, 1980-2004: Regional evidence. Journal of Policy Modeling, 31(2), 289-297. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2008.09.003.
  • Virén, M. (2001). The Okun curve is non-linear. Economics letters, 70(2), 253-257. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165- 1765(00)00370-0.
  • Weber, C. E. (1995). Cyclical output, cyclical unemployment, and Okun's coefficient: A new approach. Journal of applied econometrics, 10(4), 433-445. doi:10.1002/jae.3950100407.
  • Yilmaz, Ö. G. (2005). Türkiye ekonomisinde büyüme ile işsizlik oranları arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi. Ekonometri ve İstatistik e-Dergisi, (2), 63-76.
  • Zagler, M. (2003). The Dynamics of Economic Growth and Unemployment in Major European Countries: Analysis of Okun´ s Law. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 3(3). Retrieved from http://www.usc.es/economet/reviews/aeid336.pdf.
  • Zonzilos, N. 2000. The Philips Curve Of Greek Economy And The Time Variant Nairu. Economic Bulletin in Greek, 15, 15-31.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171506897

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.