Comments Concerning the Position of Theories in the Behavioral Sciences

• Autorzy: Andrzej Malewski
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this article, I tried (1) to distinguish between various meanings given to the word "theory" in the contemporary social sciences; (2) to present examples of three types of theories conceived as systems of strictly general propositions; and (3) to point out some problems suggested by the analysis of existing theories which seem to be relevant to the codification of theoretical knowledge in the social sciences.
An attempt was made toward clarification of three main meanings of the term "theory."
In the first meaning the term "theory" designates speculations that have not been empirically tested and that often are not testable.
In the second meaning the term is used to refer to every kind of result of scientific nativity except description. In this way "theory" is used to include: (a) new concepts, (b) operational definitions of non-operational concepts, (c) heuristic directives which describe certain classes of variables as the most important determinants of behavior, (d) models conceived as mathematical functions, sentences, diagrams, or tables concerning relationships between variables which have no empirical interpretation, (e) single general hypotheses supported by systematic evidence, (f) systems of strictly general hypotheses; and many other results of scientific work, as for example, post facto interpretations, the characteristics of a given society, metatheoretical analysis, etc.
In the third meaning the term "theory" is synonymous with a system of empirical and strictly general propositions which are in some way mutually related.
Theories conceived in the third sense were the main subject of our interest. (fragment of text)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Social sciences; Social theories; Sociology

PL

Nauki społeczne; Teorie społeczne; Socjologia

• Czasopismo: Polish Sociological Review
• Rocznik: 2017
• Numer: nr 4 (200)
• Strony: 411--432

Twórcy

autor

Andrzej Malewski

Bibliografia

• R.K. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe: The Free Press, 1957, p. 9.
• S.A. Stouffer, "Discussion," ASR, February 1947, p. 12.
• E. Shilos, The Present State of American Sociology. Glencoe: The Free Press, 1948, pp. 54-59
• G.E. Homans, The Human Group. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1950.
• H.L. Zetterberg. On Theory and Verification in Sociology. Stockholm: Almquist & Wicksell; New York: The Tressler Press, 1954.
• N. Gross, W. S. Mason and A. W. McEachern, Explorations in Role Analysis. New York: J. Willey, 1950.
• H. Becker and A. Boskoff, Modern Sociological Theory. New York: The Dryden Press, 1957;
• T. Abel, "The Present Status of Sociological Theory," ASR, Vol. 17, No. 2 (April 1952);
• T. Parsons, Essays in Sociological Theory. Glancoe: The Free Press, 1949, p. 17;
• S. Hall and G. Lindzey, Theories of Personality. "A Guide to American Sociology, 1945-1955," in H. L. Zetterberg (ed.) Sociology in the United States. Paris: UNESCO, 1956.
• C. W. Mills, The Sociological Imagination, p. 149;
• Barrington Moore, Political Power and Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1958.
• L. Festinger, A Theory of Social Comparison Processes, L. Festinger, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson, 1957;
• W. E. Miller, "Theory and Experiment Relating Psychoanalytic Displacement to Stimulus-Response Generalization," J. Abn. Soc. Psych. 1948, Vol. 43, pp. 153-178;
• M. Deutsch,"A Theory of Cooperation and Competition," Hum. Rel., Vol. II, No. 2;
• D. Cartwright and F. Harary, "Structural Balance: A Generalization of Heider's Theory," Psych. Rev., Vol. 63, No. 5, 1956, pp. 277-296;
• J. R. French, "A Formal Theory of Social Power," Psych. Rev., Vol. 63, No. 3, 1956;
• A. R. Cohen, A General Theory of Subculture in Delinquent Boys. Glencoe: The Free Press, 1955.
• K. Lewin, Field Theory in Social Science;
• T. Sarbin, "Role Theory" in G. Lindzey (ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology. Cambrige: Addison-Wesley, 1954;
• S. F. Nadel, The Theory of Social Structure. Glencoe: The Free Press, 1957;
• T. Persons and E. Shils (eds.), Perspectives in Personality Theory. New York: Basic Books, 1957.
• S. M. Lipset, M. Trow and J. Coleman, Union Democracy. Glencoe: The Free Press, 1956;
• J. Coleman, Community Conflict. The Free Press, 1957;
• G. P. Murdock, Social Structure. New York; J. Wiley, 1959;
• T. Hopkins, The Exercise of Influence in Small Groups, Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University (Unpublished), 1959;
• S. Schachter, The Psychology of Affiliation. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1959.
• N. Stanford And M. Conover, Personality, A Contribution to Project A of the American Psychological Association, unpublished.
• B. Berelson and G. Steiner, Introduction to the Behavioral Sciences. To be published.
• A. Rappaport, "Uses and Limitations of Mathematical Models in Social Sciences," in L. Gross (ed.), Symposium of Sociological Theory.
• L. Postman, "Toward a General Theory of Cognition," in J.H. Rohrar and M. Sherif (eds.), Social Psychology at the Crossroads. New York: Harper, 1951.
• K. Lewin, T. Dembo, L. Festinger and P. Sears, "Levels of Aspiration," in J. McV. Hunt (ed.), Personality and Behavior Disorder. New York: The Ronald Press, 1944.
• J. R. French, "A Formal Theory of Social Power," Psych. Review, Vol. 63, No. 3, 1956.
• L. Festinger, "An Analysis of Compliant Behavior," in M. Sherif and M. O. Wilson (eds.), Group Relations at the Crossroads. New York: Harper, 1953.
• G. E. Lenski, "Status Crystallization: A Non-Vertical Dimension of Social Status," ASR, Vol. 19, No. 4, August 1954.
• G. E. Lenski, "Social Participation and Status Crystallization," ASR, Vol. 21, No. 4, August 1956, p. 459.
• D. Bramel, "Some Determinants of Defensive Projection," Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 1960, unpublished.
• L. Festinger, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston: Row, Peterson, 1957;
• L. Festinger, "The Motivating Effect of Cognitive Dissonance," in G. Lindzey (ed.), Assessment of Human Motives. New York: Grove Press, 1960;
• F. Heider, "Attitudes and Cognitive Organization," J. Psych., Vol. 21, 1946, pp. 107-112;
• F. Beider, Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: J. Willey, 1958
• K. Popper, Logik der Forschung, and K. Popper, Logic of Scientific Discovery.
• W. F. Kenkel, "The Relationship Between Status Consistency and Politico-Economic Attitudes," Am. Soc. Review, Vol. 21, June 1956, pp. 366-368;
• J. W. Goffman, Status Consistency and Preference for Change in Power Distribution.
• S. M. Lipset and J. Linz, The Social Bases of Political Diversity. Stanford, Calif.: Center for Advanced Behavioral Sciences, 1956, Ch. VIII, p. 16;
• S. M. Lipset and R. Sendix, Social Mobility, p. 68.
• L. Festinger, "A Theory of Social Comparison Processes," Human Relations, Vol. 7, 1954, pp. 117-140.
• Erich Formm, Escape from Freedom. New York: Rinehart, 1941, p. 19.
• D. Riesman, N. Glazer, R. Denney, The Lonely Crowd. New York: Doubleday, 1953.
• B. Berelson, P. Lazarsfeld and W. McPhee, Voting.
• L. Festinger, "The Motivating Effect of Cognitive Dissonance." in G. Lindzey (ed.), Assessment of Human Motives. New York: Grove Press, 1960.
• J. Dollard and N. Miller, Personality and Psychotherapy.
• T. Hopkins, "The Exercise of Influence in Small Groups." Ph.D. thesis Columbia University, 1959, unpublished.
• S. M. Lipset, M. A. Trow and J. S. Coleman, Union Democracy. Glencoe: The Free Press, 1956.
• J.C. March and H.S. Simon, Organizations. New York: J. Wiley, 1959.
• K. Lewin, Self-Hatred among Jews in Resolving Social Conflicts. New York: Harper, 1948.
• L. Festinger, "An Analysis of Compliant Behavior," in M. Sherif and M.O. Wilson (eds.), Group Relations at the Crossroads. New York: Harper, 1953.