Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | t. 18, z. 7, cz. 3 Studia z zarządzania międzykulturowego | 65--77
Tytuł artykułu

Post-neoliberal USA : the Entrepreneurial State

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
As the economic power shifts from the West to the East, U.S. corporations are lagging behind Asian competitors. Moreover, U.S. statecraft fails to address this decline. In a world dominated by interventionist and neoclassical states, having an ineffective non-activist government becomes a costly neoclassic delusion which weakens the USA. American conservative economists keep talking about the superiority of the free market system in generating new technologies. The reality is different. The U.S. is sliding further into an overregulated, over-taxed, anti-business state. This paper argues that in order to maintain its economic strength and technological leadership, the U.S. must reform federal institutions to increase support of artificial intelligence and other cutting edge technologies. The authors outline a number of institutional reforms, under one umbrella, which they calls the American Entrepreneurial State (AES). We strongly believe that AES could improve productivity and bring about coherent business strategies for the next 10-15 years. The design and inspiration for the AES comes from the experience of successful examples from Asia and other parts the global economy. (original abstract)
  • Villanova University
  • University of Lodz
  • Amdsen A.L. (1989), Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Blinder A. (2013), Five Years Later, Financial Lessons Not Learned, "WSJ", Vol. Sept 11, A19.
  • Blinder A. (2013), After the Music Stopped: The Financial Crisis, The Response and The Work Ahead, Penguin, New York.
  • Block F., Keller M. (2008), Where Do Innovations Come From? Transformations in the U.S. National Innovation System, 1970-2006, the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, [online], access: 19.12.2017.
  • Chang H. (1999), The Economic Theory of the Developmental State [in:] M. Woo-Cumings (ed.), The Developmental State, Cornell University Press, New York, pp. 182-199.
  • Cumings B. (1999), Webs with No Spiders, Spiders with No Webs: The Genealogy of the Developmental State [in:] M. Woo-Cumings (ed.), The Developmental State, Cornell University Press, New York, pp. 61-92.
  • Deyo F.C. (1987) (ed.), The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
  • Emmett R.B. (2009), Frank Knight and the Chicago School in American Economics, Routledge, London.
  • Ferguson N. (2012), The Great Degeneration: How Institutions Decay and Economies Die, The Penguin Press, New York.
  • Fukuyama F. (2012), The Origins of Political Order, From Prehuman Times to French Revolution, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, p. 471.
  • Galston W. (2013), Government is a Good Venture Capitalist, WSJ Opinion, August 28, 2013.
  • Jones Ch.I., Williams J.C. (1997), Measuring the Social Return to R&D, [online] SSRN:,, access: 19.12.2017.
  • Johnson C. (1982), MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  • Mazzucato M. (2013), The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths, Anthem Press, London-New York.
  • Polidano C. (2001), Don't Discard State Autonomy: Revisiting the East Asian Experience of Development, "Political Studies", Vol. 49, pp. 513-527.
  • Prestowitz C. (2010), The Betrayal of American Prosperity, Free Press, New York.
  • Sharma R. (2012), Breakout Nations: In Pursuit of the Next Economic Miracles, W.W. Norton, pp. 2-15.
  • Spence M. (2012), Hard Truth About Global Growth, "Project Syndicate", [online], access: 19.12.2017.
  • The Heritage Foundation (2013), Index of Economic Freedom, Washington D.C.
  • The PWC: World in 2050 (2013), [online], access: 19.12.2017.
  • Wong J. (2004), The Adaptive Developmental State in East Asia, "Journal of East Asian Studies", Vol. 4, pp. 345-362.
  • Wade R. (1990), Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of the Government in East Asian Industrialization, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Wade R. (1992), East Asia's economic success: conflicting perspectives, partial insights, shaky evidence, "World Politics", Vol. 44 (2), pp. 270-320.
  • Woo-Cumings M. (1999), Introduction: Chalmers Johnson and the Politics of Nationalism and Development [in:] M. Woo-Cumings (ed.), The Developmental State, Cornell University Press, New York, pp. 1-31.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.