PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2018 | 14 | nr 2 Social Entrepreneurship and Social Enterprise Phenomenon: Antecedents, Processes, Impact across Cultures and Contexts | 3--18
Tytuł artykułu

Social Entrepreneurship and Social Enterprise Phenomenon : Antecedents, Processes, Impact across Cultures and Contexts

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
In the following sections of this paper, we first provide a succinct overview of SE as a phenomenon and research field. We summarize the definitional debate and point to valuable theoretical frameworks for studying SE. Next, we introduce individual authors' contributions to the issue and, finally, we propose further suggestions for future research. (fragment of text)
Twórcy
  • Gdansk University of Technology, Poland
  • University of Warsaw, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Alvord, S., Brown, D., & Letts, S. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and social transformation: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Behaviour Science, 40(3), 260-281.
  • Bachnik, K., & Szumniak-Samolej, J. (2018). Social initiatives in food consumption and distribution as part of sustainable consumption and sharing economy. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 14(2), 101-123.
  • Banks, J.A. (1972). The Sociology of Social Movements. London: MacMillan.
  • Baron, D.P. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16(3), 683-717.
  • Bornstein, D. (2004). How to change the world: Social entrepreneurship and the power of new ideas. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Chell, E. (2007). Social enterprise and entrepreneurship: Towards a convergent theory of the entrepreneurial process. International Small Business Journal, 25(1), 3-19.
  • Ciepielewska-Kowalik, A., Pieliński, B., Starnawska, M., & Szymańska, A. (2015). Social enterprise in Poland: Institutional and historical context, ICSEM Working Papers, 11. Liege: The International Comparative Social Enterprise Models (ICSEM) Project.
  • Collavo, T. (2018). Unpacking social entrepreneurship: exploring the definition chaos and its consequences in England. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 14(2), 49-82.
  • Dacin, P.A., Dacin, M.T. & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why don't need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37-57.
  • Dacin, M.T., Dacin, P.A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203- 1213.
  • Dees, J.G., & Anderson, B.B. (2006). Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: Building on two schools of practice and thought. Research on social entrepreneurship. ARNOVA Occasional Paper Series, 1(3), 39-66.
  • Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2013). The EMES approach of social enterprise in a comparative perspective. Working Paper, 12/03, EMES European Research Network.
  • Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2016). Fundamentals for an international typology of social enterprise models. ICSEM Working Papers, 33, Liege: The International Comparative Social Enterprise Models (ICSEM) Project.
  • Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Derrida, J. (1988). Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • Dey, P. (2006). The rhetoric of social entrepreneurship: Paralogy and new language games in academic discourse. In C. Steyaert & D. Hjorth (Eds.), Entrepreneurship as Social Change (pp.121-142). Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Drucker, P. (1979). The Practice of Management. London: Pan Books.
  • Edmondson, A.C., & McManus, S.E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1155-1179.
  • Hockerts, K., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2010). Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids - Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 481-492.
  • Leadbeater, C. (1997). The Rise of the Social Entrepreneur. London, England: Demos.
  • Lee, M., Battilana, J., & Wang, T. (2014). Building an infrastructure for empirical research on social enterprise: Challenges and opportunities. In J. Short (Ed.), Social Entrepreneurship and Research Methods (pp. 241-264). UK: Emerald.
  • Liu, H.C., Ip C.Y., & Liang, C. (2018). A New runway for journalists: On the intentions of journalists to start social enterprises. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 14(2), 83- 100.
  • Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44.
  • Martin, R., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2), 28-39.
  • Moss, T.W., Lumpkin G.T., & Short J.C. (2010).Social entrepreneurship: A historical review and research agenda. In H. Landström & F. Lohrke (Eds.), Historical Foundations of Entrepreneurship Research (pp. 383-405). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Mueller, S., D'Intino, R.S., Walske, J., Ehrenhard, M.L., Newbert, S.L, Robinson, J.A., & Senjem, J.C. (2015). What's holding back social entrepreneurship? Removing the impediments to theoretical advancement. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 6(3), 245-256.
  • Nicholls, A. (2006). Social entrepreneurship. In S. Carter & D. Jones-Evans (Eds.), Enterprise and Small Business (2nd ed., pp. 220-242). Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
  • Nicholls, A. (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship Theory &Practice, 34(4), 611-633.
  • Nicolopolou, K. (2014). Social entrepreneurship between cross- currents: Toward a framework for theoretical restructuring of the field. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(4), 678- 702.
  • Nyborg, K. (2000). Homo economicus and homo politicus: Interpretation and aggregation of environmental values. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 42(3), 305-322.
  • O'Connor, E.S. (2010). Location and relocation, visions and revisions: Opportunities for social entrepreneurship. In C. Steyaert & D. Hjorth (Eds.), Entrepreneurship as social change (pp.79-96). Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Peredo, A.M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56-65.
  • Perrini, F., & Vurro, C. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: Innovation and social change across theory and practice. In J. Mair, J.Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship (pp. 57 -86). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Pettigrew, A. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267-92.
  • Ravensburg, N., Lang R., Poledrini, S., & Starnawska, M. (2017). Cooperative social enterprises in Western industrialized countries. Proceedings of the 6th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise - Social enterprise for sustainable societies. Leuven, Belgium.
  • Sharir, M., & Lerner, M. (2006). Gauging the success of social ventures initiated by individual social entrepreneurs. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 6-20.
  • Shaw, E., & Carter, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: Theoretical antecedents and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(3), 418-434.
  • Short, J., Moss, T., & Lumpkin, G. (2009). Research in social entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(2), 161-194.
  • Starnawska, M. (2016a). Social entrepreneurship avenues for the field development through research paradigm intersection: Discussion. Humanities and Social Sciences, 23(4), 241-251.
  • Starnawska, M. (2016b). Social entrepreneurship research - Challenges, explanations and suggestions for the field development. Problemy Zarządzania, 14(3), 13-31.
  • Starnawska, M. (2017). Przedsiębiorczość społeczna w świetle teorii instytucjonalnej - próba przyczynku teoretycznego. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, XVIII(12), 149-160.
  • Starnawska, M. (2018). 'Comprehending' as guiding direction in social entrepreneurship and innovation education: Experts' views. Horyzonty Wychowania. Guiding Directions in Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation Education: Experts' Insights.
  • Stephan, U., & Drencheva, A. (2017). The person in social entrepreneurship: A systematic review of research on the social entrepreneurial personality. In G. Ahmetoglu, T. Chamorro-Premuzic, B. Klinger & T. Karcisky (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Entrepreneurship (pp. 205-229). Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Steyaert, C., & Dey, P. (2010). Nine verbs to keep social entrepreneurship research agenda 'dangerous'. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 231-254.
  • Teasdale, S. (2012). What's in a name? Making sense of social enterprise discourses. Public Policy and Administration, 27(2), 99-119.
  • Tracey, P., & Jarvis, O. (2007). Toward a theory of social venture franchising. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice, 31(5), 667-685.
  • Tracey, P., Philips, N., & Haugh, H. (2005). Beyond philanthropy: Community enterprise as a basis for corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(4), 327- 344.
  • Weerawardena, J., & Mort, G.S. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 21-35.
  • Young, D.R., & Brewer C.V. (2016). Introduction. In D.R. Young, E.A.M. Searing & C.V. Brewer (Eds.), The Social enterprise ZOO (pp. 3-14). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton MS, USA: Edward Elgar.
  • Zollo, L., Rialti, R., Ciappei, C., & Boccardi, A. (2018). Bricolage and social entrepreneurship to address emergent social needs: A "deconstructionist" perspective. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 14(2), 19-47.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171512840

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.