PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2018 | vol. 14, iss. 2 | 243--255
Tytuł artykułu

A Study of Elderly Welfare by Comparing Private and Public Retirement Homes: a Case Study in Bangkok

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This study assessed the subjective well-being (SWB), or welfare, of the elderly in retirement homes in Bangkok, and examined related factors, particularly from the perspective of happiness economics, since the empirical evidence in this aspect is still limited. Primary data was collected by distributing questionnaires and carrying out in-depth interviews between August 2017 and November 2017. In total, 120 participants were included, of which 60 persons were from public retirement homes (44 women and 16 men) and 60 persons from private retirement homes (40 women and 20 men). The cross-sectional data were analyzed using standard descriptive statistics and estimations of logit regressions. The logit regression results reveal that the following were positively related with SWB/welfare in all regressions as hypothesized: a short distance between the retirement home and a temple/hospital, a retirement home located in the participant's hometown, and interest in obtaining free college courses. Meanwhile, the coefficients on the need for a higher number of care staff were negative. Among the control variables, being female, being older, completing secondary school, and having plenty of money to spend were strongly and positively associated with SWB/welfare. It was noteworthy that receiving a total Barthel ADL index scores of more than 10 and having family and friends visit regularly (once or a few times a week) played an important role in increasing participants' SWB/welfare in both public and private retirement homes. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Strony
243--255
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand
Bibliografia
  • Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9-10), 2009-2042.
  • Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2000). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA (NBER Working Paper No. 7487). Retrieved June 23, 2016, from: http://www.nber.org
  • Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Money, sex and happiness: an empirical study. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 393-415.
  • Collin C., Wade D. T., Davies S., & Horne V. (1988). The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. International Disability Studies, 10(2), 61-63.
  • Croll, E. J. (2006). The intergenerational contract in the changing Asian family. Oxford Development Studies. 34(4): 473-491. doi:10.1080/13600810601045833.
  • Diener, E. (2009). The science of well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (Vol.37): Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(1), 35-47.
  • Easterlin, R. A. (2006). Life cycle happiness and its sources: Intersections of psychology, economics, and demography. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(4), 463-482.
  • Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 997- 1019.
  • Frahm, K. (2009). Family support and mental health quality in nursing homes serving residents with mental health history. University of Central Florida. Orlando, Florida.
  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being: Princeton University Press.
  • Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic Econometric (4th ed). NewYork: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
  • Hauge, S., & Kirkevold, M. (2012). Variations in older persons' descriptions of the burden of loneliness. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 26(3), 553-560.
  • Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How's life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331-360.
  • Knodel, J. & Chayovan, N. (2012). Intergenerational family care for and by older people in Thailand. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32(11), 682 - 694.
  • Knodel, J., Kespichayawattana, J., Wiwatwanich, S., & Saengtienchai, C. (2010). How left behind are rural parents of migrant children: Evidence from Thailand. Ageing and Society, 30(5), 811-841.
  • Knodel, J., Kespichayawattana, J., Wiwatwanich, S., & Saengtienchai, C. (2013). The future of family support for Thai elderly: views of the populace. Journal of Population and Social Studies, 21(2), 110-132.
  • Knodel, J. & Saengtienchai, C. (2007). Rural parents with urban children: Social and economic implications of migration on the rural elderly in Thailand. Population, Space and Place, 13(3), 193-210.
  • Mahoney, F.I., & Barthel, D.W. (1965). Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61-65.
  • Mongkol, A., Vongpiromsan, Y., Tangseree, T., Huttapanom, W., Romsai, P., & Chutha, W. (2009). The development and testing of Thai mental health indicator version 2007. Journal of the Psychiatric Association of Thailand, 54(3), 299-316.
  • Sasat, S., Choowattanapakorn T., Pukdeeprom T., Lertrat P., & Aroonsang P. (2013). Long-term care institutions in Thailand. Journal of Health Research, 27(6), 413-418.
  • Powdthavee, N. (2007). Economics of happiness: a review of literature and applications. Chulalongkorn Journal of Economics, 19(1), 51-73.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-66.
  • Teerawichitchainan, B., Knodel, J., & Pothisiri, W. (2015). What does living alone really mean for older persons? A comparative study of Myanmar, Vietnam, and Thailand. Demographic Research, 32(48), 1329-1360.
  • Verakul T. (2005). The appraisal of provision of standardized services to older persons in residential home of the Department of Social Development and Welfare (Master's thesis). Bangkok: Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University.
  • Wade D. T., & Collin C. (1988). The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? International Disability Studies, 10(2), 64-67.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171514010

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.